Wednesday, February 18, 2026

Salute to the Surrealists: Dreamworld at the Philadelphia Museum of Art


 Salute to the Surrealists: 

Dreamworld: Surealism at 100


The Philadelphia Museum of Art
November 8, 2025 - February 16, 2026

Reviewed by Ed Voves

Original photography by Anne Lloyd

"The only thing I know," Leonora Carrington declared, "is that I don't know." 

Coming at the end of a very long artistic career, these words might seem like an admission of doubt and incomprehension. Actually, Carrington's remark was anything but negative or filled with regret. 

Carrington was a Surrealist artist. Her inscrutable paintings were featured in the just-concluded exhibition, Dreamworld, at the Philadelphia Museum of Art. 



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025)
 Leonora Carrington's Ulu's Pants,1952

As can be seen in Carrington's Ulu's Pants, created in 1952, coherent subject statements and clearly depicted visual content have little place - in fact, no place - in Surrealism.

According to the foundational document of Surrealism, the essential attribute of Surrealist art was that it need be done “in the absence of any control exercised by reason, beyond any aesthetic or moral concern.”

Surrealism, by definition, was - and is - an art characterized by "not knowing."



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025)
 The entrance to the Dreamworld: Surrealism at 100
 exhibition at the Philadelphia Museum of Art

If you departed, feeling bemused or befuddled, from the Dreamworld exhibition at the Philadelphia Museum of Art, don't feel alarmed. Your response was entirely in keeping with Surrealism's approach to understanding and depicting life. Surrealist painters like Carrington seek after truth. But their art is not intended to be a deliberate, conscious exercise of their artistic powers.

To speak of Carrington in the present tense  - or of any of the other artists whose works appeared in the Dreamworld exhibit - may seem distinctly odd. 

Leonora Carrington died in 2011. Most of the leading figures of Surrealism died years, even decades, earlier. Max Ernst passed in 1976, Salvador Dali in 1989. Surrealism as a formal art movement began in 1924 and the years of its greatest influence were over by 1950. Yet, to assign begin/end dates to Surrealism and the artists who embrace it strikes me as a debatable premise, even a misleading one.

The world is a very surreal place - and always has been. Long before Andre Breton issued the Surrealist Manifesto in 1924, Francisco Goya created disturbing images, emerging from his troubled subconscious state. Goya's "caprichos" certainly qualify as Surrealist art. 



Francisco Goya, The Sleep of Reason Produces Monsters, 1797-99

So too, does the the first painting displayed in the Dreamworld exhibition. This was Giorgio de Chirico's The Soothsayer's Recompense, 1913. 



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025)
 Giorgio de Chirico's The Soothsayer's Recompense, 1913

No amount of explanation will ever solve the riddle of this enigmatic work of art, one of the treasures of the collection of the Philadelphia Museum of Art. I've studied it endless times and am still scratching my head, trying to reach a conclusion. But there can be no doubt that De Chirico, a year before the outbreak of World War I, set the stage for the Surrealist movement a decade later.

 


Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025)
Gallery view of Dreamworld: Surrealism at 100

Dreamworld at the Philadelphia Museum of Art was part of an international collaboration of six museums, led by the Centre Pompidou in Paris, which used the centennial of the 1924 Manifesto as a touchstone for examining the leading artists and themes of Surrealism. 



Ed Voves, Photo (2025)
 Matthew Affron at the press preview for Dreamtime. At left, is
Salvador Dali's Invisible Sleeping Woman, Horse, Lion (1930)

Dreamworld at the Philadelphia Museum of Art was curated by Matthew Affron, the brilliant scholar of modern art who organized the memorable Matisse in the 1930's exhibition back in 2022. The heyday of Surrealism, ranging across the 1930's-1940's, was the same as it was for the Matisse exhibit. But how different was the artistic vision of the Surrealists!



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2026)
 Gallery view of Dreamworld: Surrealism at 100

Many of the great paintings in view in Dreamworld, dating from nearly a century ago, seemed anything but dated. That's not true of the three dimensional works in the exhibit. Salvador Dali's Aphrodisiac Telephone (1938) is a period piece as much by its rotary phone dial as its lobster shell receiver!



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025)
 Salvador Dali's Aphrodisiac Telephone (1938)

In the case of Jacques Herold's The Great Transparent One (actually a replica of the original) which was displayed at the International Surrealist Exhibition of 1947) and Maria Martin's The Road; The Shadow; Too Long, Too Narrow, it is difficult to suppress a smile. These were, it needs to be remembered, serious pieces of sculpture of their time. 



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025)
 From left, Jacques Herold's The Great Transparent One (1971) & Maria Martin's The Road; The Shadow; Too Long, Too Narrow (1946)

One generation's vision of the future or of inner psychic realms often appears naive or even absurd to their successors. Then, much later, a more favorable verdict is rendered. No doubt, the same cycle of bemusement and rediscovery will hold true for the art of our contemporary era.

With paintings, Dreamworld demonstrated how artistic insights can maintain their relevance across broad expanses of time. The simpler these enduring works of art are, the likelier they are to strike a chord with museum visitors years later.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025)
 Rene Magritte's The Secret Double (1927) 

Rene Magritte's The Secret Double (1927) is one of several doppelganger-themed works which he executed during his career. It depicts a bisected face which may be either male or female. The interior is exposed to reveal dangling bells. The symbolism of these is difficult to interpret. Yet, had Magritte used 1920's mechanical gears or electronic components, rather than these medieval-looking metal bells, Secret Double's universality would have been compromised. 

Max Ernst's Fireside Angle (1937) and Salvador Dali's Soft Construction with Boiled Beans (Premonition of Civil War) (1936) are powerful works which have a  resonance today much like the impact they made back in the 1930's. War and civil strife in the 21st century were dangers we thought and hoped were left behind in the past. And yet, these paintings speak to us of our present and, quite possibly, our future.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025)
 Fireside Angel (1937) painted by Max Ernst


Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025)
 Salvador Dali's Soft Construction with Boiled Beans
 (Premonition of Civil War), 1936

Fireside Angel evokes the rapacious militarism which most people by 1937 feared would lead to a second "war to end all wars." Dali's symbolic premonition of a nation - his own, Spain - hopelessly divided against itself was a prediction which swiftly came true. By the time Ernst painted Fireside Angel, Spain was being ravaged by civil war. Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union both sent "volunteers" to Spain in order to test their new modern weapons. The city of Guernica was one of the targets.


The leering, desiccated skull in Dali's Soft Construction with Boiled Beans (Premonition of Civil War) had become both surreal - and real.

I went to Dreamworld three times and was hugely impressed with the number of outstanding works on view and the brilliant organization and design which went into mounting the exhibit. Yet, each visit raised problems in posting a review. Writer's block was not the problem. There simply was too much to say, for almost every work on view.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025) 
Gallery view of the Dreamtime exhibit at the Philadelphia Museum of Art, showing Dorothea Tanning's Birthday, 1942 (at right)
 
Dorothea Tanning's Birthday (1942) was indicative of my reaction to Dreamworld. To sit before this self-portrait for more than the average 27.2 seconds, which art museum visitors are said to devote to each work of art, was so emotionally draining as to be, dare I say it again ...?

Surreal.


Dorothea Tanning's Birthday,1942

At first glance, the most remarkable feature of Birthday is the series of doors behind the the semi-clad woman, leading to further doors and more doors. Closer inspection, however, will draw your attention away from these portals - and her bare torso! What appears to be a net of seaweed over her skirt is a tangled-mass of small, putrid-green human bodies. It is not a sight to linger on.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025) 
Detail of Dorotheo Tanning's Birthday,1942

Beneath Tanning's feet is another, seemingly loathsome, visage, straight out-of-hell. But once again, appearances are deceiving. The winged, bat-faced animal, is to be pitied, not feared. Impossible to classify, this compelling creature is a kindred being for anyone who has ever felt alone, isolated, abandoned in an alien world... in short for us all.

My interpretation of Birthday, influenced in large measure by the wartime date of its creation, is somber. Others see it in a more positive perspective. The title was coined by Max Ernst, who regarded Tanning's self-portrait as announcing the "birth" of a major new talent in the world of art.

What was true for Dorothea Tanning (1910-2012) was equally valid for Leonora Carrington (1917-2011) and Remedios Varo (1908-1963). 

Dreamworld's final gallery was devoted to Carrington and Varo. The currents of mirth, magic and mysticism, so clearly present in each of these women's art, presented post-war Surrealism in a new, unexpected light. It was a surprising and upbeat conclusion to the exhibition.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2026)
 Remedios Varo's Celestial Pablum (detail),1958

The English-born Carrington and Varo, from Spain, were engaged in surrealist art when World War II broke out. They knew one another in Paris and when each escaped the German invasion of 1940, they emigrated to Mexico where they reunited. Their friendship and mutual exploration of Surrealist themes would endure until Varo died in 1963. Along with the famous photographer, Kati Horna, they were known as "the three witches."

If the art of Carrington and Varo can be characterized by a single word, then "alchemy" is a good choice. Both women searched and sought for inner wisdom, to express the spiritual in their art and to promote harmony and healing in the world.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025)
 And Then We Saw the Daughter of the Minotaur,
    painted by Leonora Carrington in 1953

Carrington's And then We Saw the Daughter of the Minotaur, now in MOMA's collection, is a representative example of her work. Deeply engaged in myth (as befits a devotee of Carl Jung's writings), Carrington created esoteric scenes which require a lot of imaginative effort from her viewers. But the reward, entry into a parallel universe untainted by war and exploitation, makes it worth our while to do so.

By contrast, I find Varo's art filled with a quirky, wry humor which disarms our worldly pretensions and involves us in the search for holistic wisdom in a more relaxed state of mind. As surrealist art, it is less cerebral, perhaps, than Carrington's art. Yet, I find that Varo's paintings promote a more proactive and energizing sense of art appreciation.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025)
 Remedios Varo's Creation of the Birds, 1957

Varo's Creation of the Birds (1957) takes place in a sanctum of arcane experiment. A sorceress in an owl robe, who might be better described as a wisdom figure, sits alone absorbed in her otherworldly craft. She uses a hand-held light refracting device to direct beams of starlight onto figures of birds which spring to life and fly out the window.



Of course, there is more to Creation of the Birds than this literal description. More than blue jays are taking wing and soaring upward and outward to freedom. The soul of humanity, liberated by the nurturing forces of mystical alchemy, has been awakened to new life.

Creation of the Birds is a fitting, final image for our tribute to the Surrealists. However much we have learned or "don't know" from this brilliant exhibition, its singular message is clear. 

Deep within ourselves are special, spiritual gifts that can enable us to "fly."

***

Text: Copyright of Ed Voves, all rights reserved                                               

Original photography, copyright of Anne Lloyd

Introductory image: Anne Lloyd, (Photo 2025) Max Ernst’s Gala Eluard, 1924. Oil on canvas: 32 x 25 3/4 inches (81.3 x 65.4 cm.) Metropolitan Museum of Art. #2006.32.15

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025) Leonora Carrington's Ulu's Pants, 1952. Oil and tempera on Masonitel: 21 ½ x 36 in. (54.5 x 91.5 cm.) Private collection.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025) The entrance to the Dreamworld: Surrealism at 100 exhibition at the Philadelphia Museum of Art

Francisco Goya, The Sleep of Reason Produces Monsters, 1797-99. Etching and Aquatint. Plate: 8 3/8 x 5 7/8 inches (21.3 x 14.9 cm.) Philadelphia Museum of Art Collection #1949-97-9

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025) Giorgio de Chirico's The Soothsayer's Recompense, 1913. Oil on canvas: 53 3/8 x 70 7/8 inches (135.6 x 180 cm.) Philadelphia Museum of Art. #1950-134-38.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025) Gallery view of Dreamworld: Surrealism at 100.

Ed Voves, Photo (2025) Matthew Affron at the press preview for Dreamtime. At left, is Salvador Dali's Invisible Sleeping Woman, Horse, Lion (1930).

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2026) Gallery view of Dreamworld: Surrealism at 100.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025) Salvador Dali's Aphrodisiac Telephone (1938). Plastic and metal: 8 ¼ x 12 ¼ x 6 ½ in. (20.96 x 31.12 x 16.51 cm) Minneapolis Institute of Art # 96.2

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025) Surrealist Sculptures. From left, Jacques Herold's The Great Transparent One (1971), Collection of Jean-Jacques Plaisance, Paris, & Maria Martin's The Road; The Shadow; Too Long, Too Narrow (1946) Collection of the Museum of Modern Art, NYC.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025) Rene Magritte's The Secret Double (1927). Oil on canvas: 114 x 165 cm. Centre Pompidou, Paris. #AM 1980-2 

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025) Max Ernst’s Fireside Angel (1937). Oil on canvas: 114 x 146 cm. Collection Hersaint.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025) Salvador Dali's Soft Construction with Boiled Beans (Premonition of Civil War), 1936. Oil on canvas: 39 5/16 x 39 3/8 inches (99.9 x 100 cm). Philadelphia Museum of Art, # 195-134-41.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025) Gallery view of the Dreamtime exhibit at the Philadelphia Museum of Art, showing Dorothea Tanning's Birthday, 1942 (at right).

Dorothea Tanning's Birthday, 1942. Oil on canvas: 40 1/4 x 25 1/2 inches (102.2 x 64.8 cm.) Philadelphia Museum of Art. #1900-50-1

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025) Detail of Dorotheo Tanning's Birthday,1942.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2026) Remedios Varo's Celestial Pablum (detail),1958. Oil on Masonite: 36 x 24 inches (91 x 61 cm) Colleccion FEMSA, Mexico.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025) Leonora Carrington’s And Then We Saw the Daughter of the Minotaur, 1953. Oil on canvas: 23 5/8 x 27 9/16 in. (60 x 70 cm) Museum of Modern Art, NYC. #146.2019

 Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025) Remedios Varo's Creation of the Birds, 1957. Masonite: (52.5 x 62.5 cm) Museo de Arte Moderno, Mexico City

 

Thursday, January 29, 2026

Art Eyewitness Review: Renoir Drawings at the Morgan Library & Museum

 

  Renoir Drawings


The Morgan Library & Museum, New York City

October 12, 2025- February 8, 2026  

Musee d'Orsay, Paris / March 17-July 5, 2026 


Reviewed by Ed Voves

December 31, 1917, the old year passed, marking the end of one of the worst years in modern history. 1918 would be even more terrible. The final year of World War I and the outbreak of the Influenza Pandemic would sweep away the decaying European empires and consume millions of lives.

In the seaside town of Cagnes-sur-Mer in the south of France, a semblance of civility remained. There Pierre-Auguste Renoir (1841-1919) crippled by rheumatoid arthritis, lived and worked. That day, Renoir welcomed a younger artist to his home, a revolutionary whose paintings had little in common with Renoir's: Henri Matisse.

Renoir and Matisse quickly warmed to each other. Despite the radical difference in their painting styles, they did have one great, shared passion: a devotion to drawing.

Matisse, of course, is one of the supreme draftsmen in art history. But Renoir?

          


Ed Voves, Photo (2025) 
Gallery view of the Renoir Drawings exhibition
 at the Morgan Library & Museum

A masterful exhibition at the Morgan Library and Museum, now in its final weeks before traveling to the Musee d’Orsay, has launched a major reappraisal of Renoir. An artist famous for his Impressionist paintings and notorious for his late-life nudes, the Renoir of the Morgan exhibit is a master of pencil and pen, chalk and pastel.

Amazingly, the Morgan exhibition is the first major survey of Renoir drawings since 1921. That bygone exhibit, mounted by the Durand Ruel Gallery, occurred a mere three years after Renoir's death. Since then, when critical attention focused on Renoir's works on paper, these were chiefly studied as preliminary steps in the creation of his oil paintings.


Renoir Drawings consists of much more than preparatory sketches for major paintings - although the keystone of the exhibition is indeed such a work. Over one hundred drawings, pastels, watercolors and colored lithographs are displayed. Several oil paintings are also on view, as is a 1915 film clip of the aged, crippled Renoir at work. 


A film/video clip of Renoir at work in 1915, shown in the lobby of
 the Renoir Drawings exhibition at the Morgan Library & Museum

To grasp the importance of drawing for Renoir, a good place to start is the portrait of Julie Manet (1878-1966). She was the daughter of Renoir's close friend and fellow Impressionist, Berthe Morisot, who commissioned the work.



Pierre-Auguste Renoir, Child with a Cat or Julie Manet, 1887

Painted in 1887, the portrait of Julie Manet has many - but not all - of the hallmarks of Impressionist technique. Background details are applied to represent the setting without distracting the eye with a roomful of precisely rendered furnishings. Fluid brushstrokes evoke the girl's dress, giving a sense of the flowing gown which clothes her body.

Fundamental attention is devoted to Julie's face, composed with the soulful, almost pleading, look of a child trying not to squirm like the cat she holds. This facial composition marks a departure from earlier Renoir portraits. Here, as the Morgan curators note, "The strong, sharply defined contours of her face in both the sketch and the painting exemplify Renoir’s new emphasis on line and clarity in his work."


Ed Voves, Photo (2025) 
Renoir‘s Study for "Child with a Cat" or Julie Manet, ca. 1887

The preparatory drawing, one of five executed by Renoir, presents Julie in a more frontally-aligned pose than the finished portrait. Most of the details of dress, hand and cat are roughly sketched. But the new "sharply defined" features of Julie's face (of which Morisot highly approved) are very much present.

When closely examined, Renoir's drawings confirm that they were foundational to his art. 



Ed Voves, Photo (2025) 
Gallery view of the Renoir Drawings exhibition,
 showing student work by Renoir, dating to the 1860's.

Like most aspiring artists in 19th century France, the young Renoir honed his skill by copying plaster casts of classical statues. The Morgan exhibition displays a number of these student efforts. Rather unremarkable in themselves, these academic drawings show that Renoir was well-grounded in the basics.

Renoir had little need to resort to his academic training during from the crucial Impressionist years of the 1870's and early 80's. Painting landscapes en plein air was the primary focus of Renoir's work during those years and did not call for preliminary drawings. 

When sales of his Impressionist landscapes lagged, Renoir resorted to portrait painting. Drawing, in consequence, assumed greater importance in his oeuvre.

Renoir's return to drawing, however, was much more than a matter of cash flow. According to Colin Bailey, the director of the Morgan and lead curator of this splendid exhibition, Renoir confronted a "moment of truth" in his artistic career. Bailey writes:

It was Renoir’s so-called “crisis of Impressionism” of the mid-1880s and his paintings of "Motherhood and "The Great Bathers" that led him to reevaluate the role of drawing and its various functions and formats. From then on, drawings in all techniques—as well as reproductive media, from etching and drypoint to color lithography — would remain an integral part of Renoir’s output. 

Among the "various functions and formats"  in Renoir's drawing repertoire was one which, ironically, he found disagreeable to use. Yet, he became one of the great modern masters of this medium: pastel.



Pierre-Auguste Renoir, Boating Couple, 1880–1881

Pastel art had been highly-regarded during the 18th century. As a young boy, Renoir had been trained as an apprentice painter of the celebrated Limoges porcelain ware. He became especially proficient decorating cups with images of Marie Antoinette. It was the beginning of Renoir's life-long love affair of the 18th century which likely influenced his use of pastels.

In a practical sense, as well, pastels had much to offer Renoir. These drawings (some called them paintings) shared in the immediacy and appeal of Impressionist paintings. And they could be executed quickly. This was no small matter, as many of Renoir's commissions were for portraits of young children and adolescents.



Ed Voves, Photo (2025) 
Gallery view of the Renoir Drawings exhibition,
 showing a selection of pastel portraits by Renoir


Ed Voves, Photo (2025) 
Renoir's portrait of Madeleine Adam at Fourteen, 1887

If using pastels facilitated capturing the features of restive children and moody teenagers, the same was true for reclusive, temperamental painters from Aix-en-Provence! 



Ed Voves, Photo (2025) 
 Renoir's Paul Cezanne, 1880

The pastel portrait of Paul Cezanne, dating to 1880, is one of the standout works of Renoir Drawings.This perceptive and empathetic likeness of Cezanne also calls to mind the 2021 MOMA survey of Cezanne's drawings. The Morgan and MOMA exhibitions complement each other brilliantly in the way that they underscore the importance of drawing for two Impressionist masters more famous for their paintings.

The drawings by Renoir and Cezanne share two salient features. 



Pierre-Auguste Renoir, Seated Nude Seen from the Back, 1885–87

Firstly, there is not one sketch or study in the Renoir exhibit which can be labeled as hasty or "slapdash." The same was true for the 2021 MOMA display of Cezanne's drawings. 

Whether intended as preparation for a painting-in-progress or a unique, highly-finished work like Renoir's beautiful nude, executed with red chalk (above), a drawing by either of these artists is a "masterclass" in creative expression.

The attention and skill which Renoir devoted to his works on paper is apparent by contrasting a pastel and a drawing in red chalk, on view in the Morgan exhibition, with an oil painting from the collection of the Philadelphia Art Museum. 



                                  
Portrait of Mademoiselle Legrand, which Renoir painted in 1875, does not appear in the Morgan exhibition. Yet, it is so close in subject and spirit to the pastel portrait of Elizabeth Maitre (1879) and Head of a Young Girl (ca. 1900) that it makes for perfect comparison with Renoir's drawings. Viewing these three works by Renoir, it is clear that each is a masterpiece in its own, unique artistic medium.



Ed Voves, Photo (2025) 
 Renoir's Head of a Young Girl, ca. 1900
 
At the bottom of the red chalk portrait, two small-scale preliminary sketches can be seen. Renoir frequently included multiple images in a drawing. Some times these were subsidiary to the main subject being depicted; on other occasions, a number of unrelated subjects were depicted on a single sheet of paper. In doing so, Renoir followed in the artistic footsteps of Rembrandt and Watteau, a practice which Cezanne did as well.

I find such sketch sheets with their multiple images to be immensely appealing. These are akin to photo "snapshots" which document the creative process and provide insight into the artist's mind as vision is translated into imagery. As an added bonus, drawings like Study for "Dance in the Country" are a joy to behold, as compelling - or almost so - as the finished painting.
.


Pierre-Auguste Renoir, Study for "Dance in the Country", 1883

The free-wheeling spontaneity which characterizes Study for "Dance in the Country" was notably absent from Renoir's arduous and exacting effort to paint a masterpiece in the grand tradition of classic French art: The Great Bathers. 

Between 1885 to 1887, Renoir methodically executed twenty drawings in preparation for a major painting which he stated "shall knock Raphael off his pedestal." This boast was characteristic of Renoir's  risk-taking approach to art. But he almost had to eat his words. A first attempt at painting The Great Bathers failed and had to be abandoned.

Renoir put down his brushes, grasped sticks of red and black chalk and started drawing. 

Drawing and redrawing and drawing again ... until The Bathers, the frolicking young women whom art critic Louis Vauxcelles called Renoir's Venuses, came to life and were ready to be painted.



Ed Voves, Photo (2025) 
Gallery view of the Renoir Drawings exhibit, showing
  draft compositions for The Great Bathers, ca. 1885-1886

In 2018, a generous benefactor gave one of these impressive drawings to the Morgan Library's collection. On display with six (out of twenty) of Renoir's other "prep" drawings, the Morgan's Study for The Great Bathers is the foundational work of the entire exhibition.



Ed Voves, Photo (2025) 
 Renoir's oil-on-canvas, The Great Bathers, ca. 1886–87

Such high praise might seem excessive, given that The Great Bathers, on loan from the Philadelphia Art Museum, is also on view. But the more that you compare the preparatory drawing with the finished painting, one realizes that the genius of Renoir was realized as much by the creative process of The Great Bathers as in the completed oil-on-canvas.




Renoir did not, in fact, dethrone Raphael from his pedestal with The Great Bathers. But he did create a body of drawings which could favorably stand comparison with the work of Jean Auguste Ingres. For a French artist of the 19th century, there could be no greater praise.


Pierre-Auguste Renoir, Study for "The Great Bathers", ca. 1886-1887

It must be acknowledged that the drawings of nude women for The Great Bathers set Renoir on the course of painting the many nudes of his late career. Speaking on the subject, while working on The Great Bathers, Renoir explained to Berthe Morisot that the nude was "one of the essential forms of art."

What now may seem obsessive was certainly not viewed as such during Renoir's lifetime. Leading cultural figures like the poet Stéphane Mallarmé praised Renoir's nudes as expressions of the vitality of life. Artists of the succeeding generation, Bonnard, Picasso and Matisse were convinced believers in Renoir's genius. Picasso later purchased a Renoir nude, Bather Seated in a Landscape, now in the collection of the Picasso Museum in Paris.

It is important to emphasize that the aged Renoir, wracked with pain, was fixated on the beauty of life. 



Ed Voves, Photo (2025) 
Gallery view of Renoir Drawings, showing a sketch in black chalk of Gabrielle and Jean, ca. 1895, and the finished painting, 1895-96

In his later years, Renoir drew and painted his family as they experienced the joys of life, as well as plump, handsome young women, exuding beauty. 

"The pain passes", Renoir exclaimed to Matisse, during one of their moments of comradeship in the dark days of the Great War, "but the beauty remains."



Detail of Renoir's Gabrielle and Jean, 1895-1896.

At the Morgan Library exhibition, soon to head to the Musee d’Orsay, Renoir's vision of beauty still lives.

***

Text and original photos: Copyright of Ed Voves, all rights reserved 

Introductory Image: Ed Voves, Photo (2025) Pierre-Auguste Renoir’s Market Women with a Basket, ca.1888. Red and black chalk on paper:Sheet: 16 5/8 × 12 3/8 in. (42.3 × 31.5 cm) Fitzwilliam Museum, Cambridge University.

Ed Voves, Photo (2025) Gallery view of Renoir Drawing at the Morgan Library and Museum.

Ed Voves, Photo (2025) Gallery view of Renoir Drawing at the Morgan Library and Museum, showing a film/video of Renoir in 1915.

Pierre-Auguste Renoir (1841-1919) Child with a Cat or Julie Manet, 1887. Oil on canvas: 25 13/16 × 21 1/16 in. (65.5 × 53.5 cm) Musée d'Orsay

Ed Voves, Photo (2025) Renoir‘s Study for "Child with a Cat" or Julie Manet, ca. 1887. Charcoal and pencil on blue paper:Sheet: 24 7/16 × 18 1/2 in. (62 × 47 cm). Private collection.

Ed Voves, Photo (2025) Gallery view of Renoir's drawings at the Morgan Library and Museum, showing student work by Renoi, dating to the 1860's.

Pierre-Auguste Renoir (1841-1919) Boating Couple, 1880–1881. Pastel on paper.Sheet: 17 3/4 × 23 in. (45.1 × 58.4 cm) Museum of Fine Arts, Boston.

Ed Voves, Photo (2025) Gallery view of Renoir Drawing at the Morgan Library and Museum, showing pastels by Renoir.

Ed Voves, Photo (2025) Renoir's portrait of Madeleine Adam at Fourteen, 1887. Pastel and graphite on paper: Sheet: 23 5/8 × 18 7/8 in. (60 × 48 cm) Collection of Diane B. Wilsey

Ed Voves, Photo (2025) Renoir's Paul Cezanne, 1880. Pastel on paper: Sheet: 20 3/4 × 16 3/4 in. (52.7 × 42.5 cm) Private collection.

Pierre-Auguste Renoir (1841-1919) Seated Nude Seen from the Back, ca. 1885–87. Red and white chalk on paper mounted to board: 15 1/4 × 11 7/8 in. (38.7 × 30.2 cm) Collection of George Condo. 

Ed Voves, Photo (2025) Three Renoir portraits, from left, Portrait of a Young Girl (Elisabeth Maître), 1879, pastel on paper, The Albertina Museum, Vienna; Head of a Young Girl, ca. 1900, Red chalk on paper: Sheet: 18 5/16 × 12 5/16 in. (46.5 × 31.3 cm), Philadelphia Museum of Art; Portrait of Mademoiselle Legrand, 1875, Oil on canvas, 32 x 23 1/2 inches (81.3 x 59.7 cm.) Philadelphia Art Museum.

Ed Voves, Photo (2025) Renoir's Head of a Young Girl, ca. 1900. (See citation above).

Pierre-Auguste Renoir (1841-1919) Study for "Dance in the Country",1883. Brush and brown, blue, and black wash over black chalk or graphite on paper: sheet: 19 1/2 × 12 in. (49.5 × 30.5 cm) Yale University Art Gallery.

 Ed Voves, Photo (2025) Gallery view of Renoir Drawings at the Morgan Library and Museum, showing draft compositions for The Great Bathers,ca. 1885-1886.

Ed Voves, Photo (2025) Renoir's The Great Bathers, ca. 1886 – 87. Oil on canvas: 46 3/8 × 67 1/4 in. (117.8 × 170.8 cm) Philadelphia Museum of Art.

Pierre-Auguste Renoir (1841-1919) Study for "The Great Bathers", ca. 1886-1887 and 1908. Red and white chalk, with smudging and blending on wove paper, lined to canvas. Sheet: 43 1/2 × 57 in. (110.49 × 144.78 cm) Bequest of Drue Heinz, Morgan Library and Museum.

 Ed Voves, Photo (2025) Gallery view of Renoir Drawing at the Morgan Library showing (from left) Renoir's Gabrielle and Jean, ca. 1895. Black chalk on paper: sheet: 24 7/16 × 18 9/16 in. (62 × 47.2 cm) National Gallery of Canada and Renoir's Gabrielle and Jean, 1895-96. Oil on canvas: 25 9/16 × 21 1/4 in. (65 × 54 cm) Musée de l'Orangerie, Paris.

Ed Voves, Photo (2025) detail of Renoir's painting, Gabrielle and Jean (see above).