Showing posts with label Modernism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Modernism. Show all posts

Monday, November 7, 2022

Art Eyewitness Review: Matisse in the 1930's at the Philadelphia Museum of Art

 Matisse in the 1930's

Philadelphia Museum of Art

October 20, 2022 - January 29, 2023

Reviewed by Ed Voves

Original photography by Anne Lloyd

The "grizzle-chinned, wrinkle-browed" face of Henri Matisse appeared on the cover of Time Magazine on October 20, 1930. It was a notable honor in            what should have been a very good year for Matisse. He had vacationed in Tahiti and traveled to the United States where he served on a prestigious art award jury. His own paintings were selling well and his son, Pierre, was setting up a gallery in New York City.

All was not well for Matisse, however, in 1930.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022)
 Henri Matisse, Self-Portrait, 1937

Matisse's critical reputation was in marked decline. Many of his fellow artists from the pioneering days of modern art looked askance at his recent paintings. Hostile art critics and the radicals of the Surrealist Movement openly scorned and derided him.

The decade of the 1930's would turn the tables on Matisse's detractors and opponents. Beginning with a commission to paint a large mural, which he boldly accepted during his visit to the United States, Matisse reinvigorated his oeuvre - and his life. 



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022)
  Matisse in the 1930's at the Philadelphia Museum of Art.
Large Seated Nude (bronze) at center.

A magnificent exhibition has just opened at the Philadelphia Museum of Art, detailing this crucial decade during which Henri Matisse (1869-1954) created some of his greatest works of art. Two French museums are participating in this extraordinary effort, the Musée de l’Orangerie in Paris and the Musée Matisse Nice, where the exhibition will be displayed in 2023, following its initial presentation in Philadelphia. 



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022)
 Curators of Matisse in the 1930's: Mathew Affron, Philadelphia Museum of Art, and Claudine Grammont, Musée Matisse Nice

Approximately 140 works of art are on view in the special exhibit galleries of the Philadelphia Museum of Art, including major paintings and a selection of sculptures. Additional insight is provided by a wide-range of drawings, prints and deluxe art books for which Matisse prepared special illustrations.

 


Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022)
 Henri Matisse, Interior with an Etruscan Vase, 1940

The defining work of art created by Matisse during the "30's", however, could not be transported to the walls of the Philadelphia Museum of Art. But this work, a mighty mural, is close-at-hand, just a few blocks away at the Barnes Foundation. This stroke of good fortune - and savvy planning - makes for a unique opportunity to appreciate Matisse's art not likely to occur again for a long time to come.

The pivot of Matisse in the 1930's is the "back-story" of the Barnes mural, The Dance. Matisse created this sensational work of art for Dr. Albert Barnes, the most brilliant, opinionated and controversial art collector of the era. Few episodes in the history of modern art are more fascinating or influential than this improbable partnership.

Matisse in the 1930's then proceeds to examine Matisse's paintings - drenched with color and quiet passion - which followed in the wake of this celebrated masterpiece. Matisse's collaboration with the Ballet Russes de Monte Carlo rounds-off a decade of achievement which was little short of a resurrection.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022)
  Gallery view of Matisse in the 1930's 

Matisse during the 1930's can only be understood by first studying his works from the 1920's. Indeed, it is important to try and appreciate the cultural current of France during the years following the First World War. The dramatic "call to order" in 1918 by the French poet and filmmaker, Jean Cocteau, asserted the need for artists to reassert civilized values and traditional artistic themes after four years of insane slaughter.

Cocteau first sounded Le Rappel a l’ordre in 1918, but Matisse had already steared his own course in that direction in December 1917. Travelling to Nice, in the south of France, Matisse tried to shake-off the stress and strain of the war, both of his sons having been called to serve in the French Army. He focused his art on themes far from the unquiet Western Front.

The dominant motif in the opening gallery of Matisse in the 1930's is the odalisque. Dressed in the exotic garb of the women of Algeria and Morocco - often very scanty clothing - the odalisque was a figure of mystery and sensuality. Delacroix and Ingres had painted notable examples of this genre during the early 1800's, so when Matisse adopted the odalisque as his subject of choice, he was following in the footsteps of giants of classical French art.

Matisse loved the tactile texture of colorful fabric and the beauty of young women. Painting odalisques enabled him to indulge his enthusiasm for both. 



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022)
 Henri Matisse, The Moorish Screen, 1921

The Moorish Screen, painted in 1921, presents an enclosed world of ease and beauty. The intricate screen, with its pattern of arabesque designs, shields the two women from even a hint of unpleasantness, noise and squalor from the outside world. 

Here, in this elegantly furnished room, order has been restored. But such a relaxed atmosphere, especially given the sultry climate of North Africa, allowed repressed Europeans to engage in fantasies with overtones of sexual indulgence and exploitation.  



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022)
 Henri Matisse, Large Odalisque in Striped Pantaloons, 1925

Large Odalisque in Striped Pantaloons is a striking example of Matisse's skill in drawing and printmaking. This lithograph, created in 1925, is very much in the tradition of Ingres, one of the greatest masters of drawing in European art. On its own, individual, merits, Large Odalisque is a very impressive work, devoid of any hint of exploitation. Matisse here presents an image of a sensitive, intelligent woman at peace with her body and her personal identity.        

                                                                                                                   


Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022)
 Detail of Large Odalisque in Striped Pantaloons, 1925

When Large Odalisque in Striped Pantaloons is viewed along with the other depictions of nude or semi-clad women in the exhibition's opening gallery, there is a definite shift in feeling. The effect is unsettling, to say the least, putting the viewer in the role of a voyeur. 



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022)
 Henri Matisse, Odalisque with Grey Trousers, 1926-1927

Was this true of Matisse, as well? Had the revolutionary leader of the Fauves become an artistic hedonist, content to boost his profits with sales of socially-acceptable erotica?

A very different perspective of this great French artist emerges in the pages of Hilary Spurling's brilliant biography. Matisse's painting sessions were marked by intense, often "unbearable" concentration, as the exacting painter wrestled with problems of color, design and theme. 

For Matisse - and his models - there was remarkably little of Luxe, calme et volupté (Luxury, peace, and pleasure), the title of his famous 1904 painting, in the daily ordeals in his studio. 

"I have always thought," Matisse wrote "that a large part of a painting's beauty derives from the artist's combat with his own limited means of expression."

Painting odalisques for Matisse was a form of expression - rigorous, challenging and artistically rewarding. Yet, it is difficult to escape the conclusion that Matisse's critics were correct to question his emphasis on painting odalisques over the course of the 1920's. 

Moreover, Matisse had to be aware of the dangers of devoting himself to "classical" art. 

"A young painter who cannot liberate himself from the influence of past generations," Matisse had famously declared, "is digging his own grave."

Now, the middle-aged Matisse needed a new challenge to keep from "digging his own grave." 

Matisse got exactly that in the autumn of 1930. He took a day-off from his duties as an art jury member for the Carnegie Commission to visit the Barnes Foundation, located in Merion, PA, a suburb of Philadelphia.

The visit to the Barnes Foundation went well. Matisse was able to see many of his own early masterpieces. No less than twenty-five works by Matisse were part of the Barnes' collection when it opened in 1925 to a select audience.

Astutely noting the wide-range of Barnes' collecting interests, Matisse declared approvingly that "the old masters are put beside the modern ones, Rousseau next to a Primitive, and this juxtaposition helps students to understand a lot of things that the academies don't teach."



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2020)
  Gallery view of Room 15 at the Barnes Foundation.   
Matisse's Red Madras Headress, 1907, appears at right

Dr. Barnes could not have expressed that better himself. He was impressed with Matisse and offered him a commission to paint a sprawling three-piece mural spanning the central hall of his private museum. Matisse agreed, the choice of topic being reserved to him rather than Barnes. This was a major concession from Barnes, but his side of the bargain was reflected in the modest $30,000 commission to be paid in three installments. 

For the theme of the Barnes mural, Matisse reached back to an earlier commission. This was the creation in 1910 of two decorative panels, Dance and Music, for Sergei Shchukin (1854-1936), a Moscow industrialist with a visionary interest in modern art. 

Matisse's paintings for Shchukin were huge wall-sized works. The Dance for Dr. Barnes would be vaster still, the three panels measuring fifteen feet high by forty-five feet. The central panel (slightly bigger than its companions) dwarfed the entire Russian Dance painting in size.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) 
Henri Matisse's The Dance Mural, 1932-33, at the Barnes Foundation

The epic campaign to create The Dance for the Barnes Foundation extended from the summer of 1932 to April 1933. The prolonged effort is brilliantly chronicled in the exhibition - even if the "star" of the show is off-stage at the Barnes. 



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022)
 Gallery view showing preparatory studies for The Dance Mural

                                                     
Henri Matisse, Gray Harmony, Oil Study for The Dance Mural, 1930–31

An impressive array of the preparatory sketches and studies are on view, which deserve detailed study. The temptation to hurry past these "prep" works to view the huge "sketch at scale" of the central dancer's legs is hard to resist.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) 
Matisse's Drawing at the Scale of the Central Figure
 of the Barnes Mural, "The Dance", 1931-32 

Equally addictive is the wonderful documentary film of Matisse at work on the mural. We see him wielding his long bamboo stick, tipped with a piece of charcoal, then carefully positioning the wheeled step-ladder, ably assisted by his faithful dog, Raudi. The film was shot by Mrs. Robert Sattler and later transferred to video.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) 
Scene from the 1932 film by Mrs. Robert Sattler,
 Matisse Working on "The Dance" in the rue Desire Niel Studio

To paint this massive work in France, rather than on site in America, invited difficulties. Matisse made a "huge mistake" in the initial measurements, according to the tactless Dr. Barnes. But he rallied quickly and carried the project through to a successful conclusion. Travelling with the completed mural to the United States in May 1932, Matisse installed The Dance in the central hall of the Barnes Foundation.

It was a moment of triumph, disappointment and the discovery of a "silver lining." Matisse's jubilation was dashed when Dr. Barnes closed the doors of his museum, soon after the mural was installed. Except for selected students and a few honored guests, hardly anyone was permitted to see The Dance. This woeful state of affairs continued for decades. Matisse fumed at Barnes, calling him "a monster of egotism."

The "silver lining" was soon discovered. Creating The Dance inspired Matisse to an extraordinary degree. The experience of painting a figurative work of this type, where the dancers represented pure movement unencumbered by any cultural or social attributes, unleashed the talents of Matisse, which had been held in check during the odalisque years of the 1920's.

The Dance was a catalyst for a sustained burst of creative genius, lasting from 1933 to 1940. For Matisse, these years were a second-lease on artistic life, a return to the vigorous use of color of the pre-World War I era, tempered and enhanced by a celebration of the human body. 

The galleries devoted to Matisse's easel paintings, post-The Dance, exude a life-affirming spirit which is simply astonishing. 



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022)
  Gallery view of Matisse in the 1930's, showing two versions of 
 Henri Matisse's Window at Tahiti, 1935

I sensed a real excitement and pleasure among my fellow art lovers as we beheld one "mid-Matisse" masterpiece after another: Dancer Resting,1940, from the Toledo Museum of Art and Large Reclining Nude (1935) from the Cone Collection of the Baltimore Art Museum. 



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) 
Henri Matisse, Dancer Resting, 1940

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) 
Henri Matisse, Large Reclining Nude, 1935

And from the Philadelphia Museum of Art there was the "home team's" own Matisse icon, Women in  Blue (1937).




Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022)
 Henri Matisse, Woman in Blue, 1937

There is a naturalness and modern-day sophistication to these 1930's paintings strikingly at odds with the 1920's odalisques. And when Matisse did hearken back to the odalisque theme, as with his 1937 Yellow Odalisque, the chic modernity of its protagonist makes the title seem like an ironic play on words.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) 
Henri Matisse, Yellow Odalisque, 1937

As the decade of the 1930's progressed, Matisse continued working with unremitting energy and audacity. He collaborated on projects for ballet props and costumes, which the exhibition illustrates with a 1939 film of a dance troupe performing on a set influenced by the design of the Barnes mural. 



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) 
A video at Matisse in the 1930's, showing the Ballets Russes de Monte-Carlo performing Red and Black in Chicago in 1939.

Perhaps most significantly, Matisse returned to creating book illustrations which he had done earlier in his career. Towards the end of the 1930's, he began to focus on drawings for special edition books of a type known as livre d'artiste.  

What was a sideline to his productivity during the 1930's became a vital facet of his career, following his near-death in 1941 from abdominal cancer. Matisse painted only sporadically thereafter. 

Unable to stand before his easel, Matisse drew simple, yet elegant, pictures and "painted with scissors", making cut-outs. Both were used to illustrate exquisite volumes of the poems of Stéphane Mallarmé, Charles Baudelaire and the medieval poet, Charles d’Orleans. 

The Matisse in the 1930's exhibit ends with an examination of the 1943 book of illustrations, Drawings:Themes and Variations. This volume contains seventeen sets of drawings, each representing a letter of the the alphabet, with a total of 158 drawings. Two sets are on view in the exhibition. 



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) 
Title page of Henri Matisse's Drawings: Themes and Variations,1943

Given the spectacular nature of the art works in the earlier galleries, this might appear to be a quiet "fade-out" to conclude Matisse in the 1930's. 

In reality, this final gallery is a summation of Matisse's 1930's work and a forecast of what was to come. Working under the shadow of Nazi tyranny and the specter of his own mortality, Matisse devoted himself to a series of drawing projects which culminated in his designs for the Roman Catholic Chapel of Vence, consecrated in June 1951.

Henri Matisse died on November 3, 1954. His heart finally gave out. The stream of creative energy, rejuvenated by his acceptance of a mural commission from Dr. Albert Barnes in the autumn of 1930, was still flowing.

***


Original photos, Anne Lloyd, all rights reserved

Introductory Image: Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Detail of Henri Matisse's The Conversation, 1938. Oil on canvas: San Francisco Museum of Modern Art: Bequest of Mr. James D. Zellerbach, # 93.149

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Henri Matisse's Self-Portrait, 1937. Charcoal with stumping on laid paper: 13 3/8 x 11 1/4 inches (34 x 28.5 cm.) National Gallery of Art, Washington D.C. #1985.64.104

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Gallery view of the Matisse in the 1930's exhibition at the Philadelphia Museum of Art. Large Seated Nude (bronze) at center.
 
Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Curators of the Matisse in the 1930's exhibition. From left: Mathew Affron, Philadelphia Museum of Art, and Claudine Grammont of the Musée Matisse Nice

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Henri Matisse's Interior with an Etruscan Vase, 1940. Oil on canvas: 29  x 42 1/4 inches. Cleveland Museum of Art. Gift of the Hanna Fund. 1952.153

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Henri Matisse's The Moorish Screen, 1921. Oil on canvas: 36 3/16 x 29 1/4 inches. Philadelphia Museum of Art

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Henri Matisse's Large Odalisque in Striped Pantaloons, 1925. Lithograph (sheet): 26 1/8  x 22 5/8 inches Philadelphia Museum of Art. 1950-129-118.
 
Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Henri Matisse's Odalisque with Grey Trousers, 1926-1927. 21 1/4 × 25 9/16 inches, Oil on canvas. Musée de l'Orangerie 

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Henri Matisse's The Dance Mural, 1932-33, at the Barnes Foundation, Philadelphia PA. Oil on canvas; three panels: (left): 133 3/4 x 173 3/4 in. (339.7 x 441.3 cm) (center): 140.2 x 198.2 in. (355.9 x 503.2 cm)  (right): 133 3/8 x 173 in. (338.8 x 439.4 cm) Barnes Foundation. # 2001.25.50 a,b,c

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Gallery view of Matisse in the 1930's, showing Matisse's preparatory studies for The Dance mural at the Barnes Foundation. The studies in pencil, gouache, and oil are from the Musée Matisse Nice.

Henri Matisse (French, 1869-1954) Gray Harmony, Oil Study for Barnes Mural, 1930–31. Oil on canvas: 13 inches × 34 9/16 inches. Musée Matisse Nice, France. © 2022 Succession H. Matisse/Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022), Henri Matisse's Drawing at the Scale of the Central Figure of Barnes Mural, "The Dance". First Version, 1930–31. 

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Scene from the 1932 film by Mrs. Robert Sattler, Matisse Working on "The Dance" in the rue Desire Niel Studio.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Gallery view of the Matisse in the 1930's exhibition showing two versions of Matisse's Window in Tahiti, 1935.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Henri Matisse's Dancer Resting, 1940. Oil on canvas: 32 × 25 1/2 in. (81.3 × 64.8 cm). Toledo Museum of Art. Gift of Mrs. C. Lockhart McKelvy 1947.54

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Henri Matisse's Large Reclining Nude 1935. Oil on canvas: 26 1/8 × 36 3/4 inches (66.4 × 93.3 cm). Baltimore Museum of Art: The Cone Collection, formed by Dr. Claribel Cone and Miss Etta Cone of Baltimore, Maryland, 1950.258. 

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Henri Matisse's Woman in Blue, 1937. Oil on canvas.: 36 1/2 x 29 inches (92.7 x 73.7 cm).  Philadelphia Museum of Art: Gift of Mrs. John Wintersteen, 1956-23-1

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Henri Matisse's Yellow Odalisque, 1937. Oil on canvas: 21 3/4 x 18 1/8 inches. Philadelphia Museum of Art, Samuel and Vera White collection. #1967-30-57

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Gallery view of Matisse in the 1930's, showing a video of a film the Ballets Russe de Monte-Carlo, performing Red and Black (Strange Farandole) in Chicago in 1939. Original film was shot by Anna Barzel.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) The title page of Henri Matisse's Drawings: Themes and Variations, 1943.  









Wednesday, October 26, 2022

Art Eyewitness Review: Modigliani Up Close at the Barnes Foundation

 


Modigliani Up Close

Barnes Foundation, Philadelphia
October 16, 2022 - January 29, 2023

Reviewed by Ed Voves

Original Photography by Anne Lloyd 

Modigliani Up Close, the title of the new exhibit at the Barnes Foundation, was aptly chosen. The very fiber of Modigliani's art, the chisel marks of his sculpting tools on limestone blocks, the brush strokes of his controversial paintings - these comprise the subject matter of this fascinating Barnes exhibition. 

As a result of such intimate study, our perception of Amedeo Modigliani (1884-1920) shifts from regarding him as a doomed, self-destructive victim of his own excesses to a more balanced appraisal. Modigliani was one of the greatest figurative artists, in stone and paint, of the twentieth century. In a decade and a half of prodigious effort, he joined in shifting the trajectory of modern art while maintaining its human face.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) 
Gallery view of Modigliani Up Close, showing The Little Peasant, c. 1918

Art lovers who relish the harrowing details of the lives of "tragic" artists may - at first - be disappointed with the theme of the Barnes exhibition.  Examining the art of Modigliani with few digressions about his personal life is seemingly to ignore a compelling part of his story. Modigliani certainly was one of art history's great "hell-raisers" - though hardly in the same league with Caravaggio or Jackson Pollock. 

The great "tragedy" of Modigliani is the mystery of how he so quickly adapted his classical art training to the radical innovations of Modernism. There is so much we don't know about the young Modigliani. Many of his early works have not survived. Short of cash, Modigliani frequently abandoned art works when he slipped out of his studio/living quarters because he could not pay the rent.

When Modigliani arrived in Paris in 1906, he identified himself as a sculptor. It was a surprising declaration. He had no systematic training in sculpting as a student in Italy. Indeed, there is little evidence of Modigliani investigating and copying any of the great masters of art, except for Cezanne.

Yet, Modigliani quickly demonstrated his ability as a portrait painter after arriving in Paris. Even more dramatically, in October 1912, at the Salon d' Automne, seven of his carved stone heads were prominently displayed. Where did Modigliani find the creative spark for these sensational works of art?  How had this stunning transformation occurred? 

Modigliani was fortunate in finding an enthusiastic supporter, Dr. Paul Alexandre, during his early years in Paris. Alexandre, at Modigliani's request, supplied an introduction to the Romanian sculptor, Constantin Brancusi. This evolved into a key relationship from the standpoint of artistic development. Brancusi taught Modigliani the basics of carving and his example as an independent sculptor was huge.

Modigliani's sculptures and paintings are so unique, however, that no single source can have supplied the impetus for the creative revolution which led him to create these incomparable works of art. Scholars of Modigliani's work rightly note the influence of African art, so important for many of the artists of his era. But there is so much more to consider.

One of the intriguing theories about Modigliani's sculptures is that he created these enigmatic stone heads with a group presentation in mind. There are stories of him placing candles on top of some of these heads. The Barnes exhibit catalog entry for the Head of a Woman (1912) notes that "waxy surface accretions extend in long drips from the oblong area at the crown of the head down the proper-left side."

The effect of the flickering candles in Modigliani's darkened studio, according to Jacob Epstein, "was that of a primitive temple."

Such an unearthly scene is unlikely to ever take place in a museum. However, by some unintended trick of overhead lighting in the Barnes exhibit gallery, my wife Anne took a photo of Head of a Women which provides a sense of the numinous atmosphere in Modigliani's candle-lit studio. 



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022)
 Amedeo Modigliani's Head of a Woman, 1912

It was just a coincidence of course, but it did cause my eyebrows to rise a bit when I realized that this wax-dripped Head of a Woman was likely one that Epstein had seen!

If the Barnes curators refrained from lighting any candles, they did replicate the Salon d' Automne display with eight of Modigliani's sculpted heads. It is an extraordinary sight to behold.



Anne Lloyd, Photo, (2022)
Sculpture gallery at Modigliani Up Close at the Barnes Foundation

Between 1909 and 1915, Modigliani carved twenty-three stone heads and two standing/crouching figures. Accurately dating these sculptures has bedeviled art scholars for decades. The earliest-presumed one is in the collection of Harvard's Fogg Museum. It is believed to have been created in 1911 and shows little influence of African art. 



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022)
 View of Modigliani Up Close at the Barnes Foundation,
 with Amedeo Modigliani's Head, c. 1911, in the foreground

A 1910 painting, now in a private collection, likely served as a model for this stone head (also known as Head Vlll). The major difference between the painting and the sculpted head is that the latter is graced by an enigmatic smile.

 


Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022)
  Amedeo Modigliani's Head, c. 1911, from the Fogg Museum

This unearthly smile recalls the facial expression appearing on the kouros and kore statues of archaic-era Greece. With his training in classical art in Florence and Venice, Modigliani would have been familiar with these early Greek statues.

African and Oceanic art was all the rage in the avant-garde communities of  Montmartre and Montparnasse. Modigliani enthusiastically joined in the celebration of "primitive" art. 



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) 
MOMA's Head, c. 1915, on display at Modigliani Up Close

All 22 of the remaining stone heads Modigliani created have elongated, mask-like faces. There are slight, but telling, differences among the various heads. The unfinished one now in the Hirshhorn Museum has a concave face unlike all the others. It is a fascinating piece to study, leading us to ponder its likely shape and expression had it been completed.



 Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022)
Amedeo Modigliani's Head (unfinished), 1911-12

The most finished areas of some of the heads, at the rear of the blocks, were the result of being polished by industrial tools - not by Modigliani's hand.

 


Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022)
 Profile view of Amedeo Modigliani's Head, c. 1915, from MOMA 

Modigliani secured these limestone blocks from Parisian construction workers, sometimes after sharing a bottle of brandy with them. On other occasions, he slipped into building sites under the cover of darkness and made-off with a block of stone. It was a fairly common practice.

As noted, the Barnes exhibition and the related catalog do not cover Modigliani's "bohemian" life style in any detail. Instead, very detailed analysis is devoted to his artistic techniques and the materials he used. If not a "page-turning" read, the catalog leaves no doubt about the dedication and zeal of Modigliani as he labored in carving limestone blocks into a body of sculpture that is both monumental and deeply moving.

Here is a sample of the catalog text, dealing with Head of a Woman (1911-12) in the Chester Dale Collection of the National Gallery of Art in Washington, D.C.

Known for his direct-carving method and impatience with clay modeling, Modigliani took advantage of limestone's excellent carving properties and employed a standard array of stone-carving tools... He likely began by roughing out the shape from the large mass of stone using a hammer and point chisel before switching to a flat chisel to delineate two shallow arcs - one for the top of the forehead,  the other to define the extent of the top layer of hair.

Even with the intensity of his work ethic and increasing facility in carving, Modigliani could not sustain his vocation as a sculptor. By 1915, his already weakened lungs (from childhood ailments) were endangered by daily exposure to a barrage of limestone chips and dust particles. He switched back to painting and, in the four years of frenzied life remaining to him, produced the striking portraits and nudes which fill the galleries of the Barnes exhibition space.

As a portrait painter, Modigliani was daring and uncompromising. 



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022)
 Amedeo Modigliani's The Amazon, 1909

In 1909, Dr. Alexandre secured a commission for "Modi" to paint an aristocratic woman, Baroness Marguerite de Hasse de Villiars, in her riding apparel. Modigliani refused his sitter's demand to depict her in a red English hunting jacket. Modigliani insisted that it be a golden-orange hue, which worked brilliantly against the dark, Velazquez-style background. Baroness de Hasse refused to pay for her portrait and the indulgent Alexandre bought it, now titled The Amazon.

As Modigliani's interest in African and Oceanic art deepened, he began to incorporate the insights he derived from these new and - for many - alarming sources into his portraits. We can readily see this transition in his 1915 portrait of the English writer, Beatrice Hastings. 



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022)
 Amedeo Modigliani's Madam Pompadour, 1915

Ironically bearing the title Madam Pompadour (an indication of their tempestuous relationship), the painting blends African mask-like treatment with Hastings' actual features.

Modigliani was often so hard-up for funds that he reused a canvas for a new portrait or painted on the back of one, as we see in Maud Abrantes (1908), painted on the verso of his unsettling Nude with a Hat.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022)
 Amedeo Modigliani's Maud Abrantes (1908)

The curatorial team of Modigliani Up Close scrutinizes Modigliani's paintings with the same exactitude  as they did for the carved heads. Important consideration is given to Modigliani's switch to using a blue-gray base coat for his later paintings. The curators even count the average number of threads per .cm on the canvases of some of Modigliani's paintings (albeit in the footnotes).

For visitors to Modigliani Up Close, the results of the close-examination of Modigliani's works are displayed in numerous large format photos of the X-radiograph scans of his paintings. These are placed side-by-side with the originals. This allows for fascinating, comparative study of how  Modigliani worked and revised his paintings.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) 
 Patron compares Modigliani's Jeanne Hébuterne, 1919,
 with an X-radiograph of the painting.

Modigliani's reuse of canvases allowed him to scrap-off paint or leave it, depending on the kind of surface texture he wanted on the new painting. This can be seen by comparing the finished version of Portrait of a Girl (c. 1916-17), now in the Tate's collection, with the X-radiograph.




Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022)
 Amedeo Modigliani's Portrait of a Girl (c. 1916-17) and X-radiograph

Along with the working revisions of Portrait of a Girl, the X-radiograph shows that an earlier portrait, almost certainly of Beatrice Hastings, which was painted over. Modigliani was certainly not a sentimentalist.

Nor was Modigliani coy about acknowledging his sexuality. The Barnes exhibition displays an impressive array of his nudes. These are among the most erotically-charged nudes in the canon of Western art. 



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022)
 Gallery view of Modigliani Up Close, showing Reclining Nude, 1917

Modigliani painted unclothed women in ways which definitely straddle the "nude/naked" categorization. But they are not pornographic by any standard, even in 1917. There was little to see that Manet or Courbet had not depicted decades earlier. The infamous closure of Modigliani's one exhibition on charges of public indecency was due mostly to the location of the Berthe Weil Gallery, where some of these nudes were on prominent display in the window. It was directly across the street from a police station!

As the Barnes exhibition text reveals, the age of sexual consent in France during the World War I years was thirteen. Modigliani, red-blooded male that he was, showed that he was aware of that stipulation. His sensitive portrait of a young-teen girl named Elvira is a tribute to her physical beauty and also to her legal status and her emotional well-being.

 


Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) 
 Amedeo Modigliani's Standing Nude (Elvira), c. 1918

Moreover, Modigliani never painted any of the women in his life in the nude. He was respectful to Beatrice Hastings, despite public displays of anger, and the same was true of the last - and most tragic - love of his life, Jeanne Hébuterne.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022)
A patron examines Modigliani's Portrait of Jeanne Hébuterne, 1918

The row of three-quarter length portraits of Jeanne Hébuterne is one of the highlights of the exhibition. In a demonstration of the true alchemy of art, Modigliani translated his love for Jeanne into incomparable, profoundly beautiful portraits. Part-Botticelli Madonna, part-tribal goddess, entirely a unique person in her own right! This was how Modigliani depicted the young woman who could not live without him.



Amedeo Modigliani,
 Blue Eyes (Portrait of Madame Jeanne Hébuterne), 1917

After the disaster of the Bethe Weil Gallery exhibition, Modigliani went to the south of France to try and regain his health. The life force was draining from him, as his lungs gave way to the tuberculosis he had contracted as a boy. 



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022)
 Detail of Amedeo Modigliani's Self-Portrait, 1919

This was a difficult period, in many ways, marked by the last bloody months of fighting of World War I, the pandemic of the Spanish influenza and the tense uncertainty that the November 11, 1918 Armistice would hold.

Modigliani responded to his dwindling health and the global tragedy by painting a moving series of portraits of anonymous young people. 



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Amedeo Modigliani's The Boy, c.1919

I was particularly struck by the image of a young boy wearing a horizon-blue military tunic such as the troops of the French Army wore. As France scrapped the "bottom of the barrel" to find recruits to fill the depleted ranks of its army, was this pensive youth wondering if he would be called upon to fight the last battle of the War to End All Wars?

We will never know, but the important lesson of these final paintings of Modigliani's brief life was what he chose for his subject matter -  hope rather than despair, not death but life.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022)
 Amedeo Modigliani's Head, 1911-12, from the Guggenheim Museum 

Years before, in 1912, Modigliani joined with Jacob Epstein in a visionary plan to create a "temple of beauty" filled with their sculptures. It was, as we know to our sorrow, never built.

Some dreams, however, do not die. Modigliani Up Close, at the Barnes Foundation, has summoned Modigliani's dream back to life and made it real.

For the next few months, in Philadelphia, Amedeo Modigliani's Temple of Beauty will be on view for all to see.

***

Text: Copyright of Ed Voves. Original Photos: Anne Lloyd, All rights reserved

Introductory image: Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Amedeo Modigliani's Head, 1911-12. Limestone: 25 x 6 x 8 1/4 in, (63.5 x 15.2 x 21 cm.) Guggenheim Museum, 55.1421

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022)  Gallery view of Modigliani Up Close, showing Amedeo Modigliani's The Little Peasant, c. 1918, from the Tate Collection, London.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Amedeo Modigliani's Head of a Woman, 1912. Limestone: 28 1/2 x 6 5/16 x 9 1/2 in., (71.4 x 16 x 24.1 cm.) Philadelphia Museum of Art. Gift of Mrs. Maurice J. Speiser. # 1950-2-1

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Modigliani Up Close at the Barnes Foundationshowing the sculpture gallery display of 8 carved heads by Amedeo Modigliani.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Gallery view of Modigliani Up Close at the Barnes Foundation, with Amedeo Modigliani's Head, c. 1911 in the foreground.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022)  Amedeo Modigliani's Head, c. 1911. 15 1/2 x 12 1/4 x 7 3/8 in., (39.4 x 31.1 x 18.7 cm.) Fogg Museum – Harvard. #1992.254

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Gallery view of the Modigliani Up Close exhibition. In the foreground is the Museum of Modern Art’s Head, c. 1915, by Amedeo Modigliani. Limestone: 22 1/4 x 5 x 14 3/4" (56.5 x 12.7 x 37.4 cm) Gift of Abby Aldrich Rockefeller in memory of Mrs. Cornelius J. Sullivan. #593.1939

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Amedeo Modigliani's Head, 1911-12. Stone: 19 5/8 x 7 1/4 x 9 in. (49.5 x 18.4 x 22.8 cm) Hirshhorn Museum #66.3582

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Profile view of Amedeo Modigliani's Head, c. 1915, from the MOMA collection.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Amedeo Modigliani's The Amazon, 1909. Oil on canvas: 36 1/4 x 25 9/16 inches (92 x 65 cm)  Private collection.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Amedeo Modigliani's Madam Pompadour, 1915Oil on canvas: 24 1/16 x 19 3/4 inches (61.1 x 50.2 cm) Art Institute of Chicago, Winterbotham Collection.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Amedeo Modigliani's Maud Abrantes (1908)

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Gallery view of the Modigliani Up Close exhibition. Patron is comparing Modigliani's Jeanne Hébuterne, 1919, with an X-radiograph of the painting.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Amedeo Modigliani's Portrait of a Girl (c. 1916-17) Oil on canvas: 31 3/4 x 23 1/2 inches (80.6 x 59.7 cm) Tate Collection, London.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) X-radiograph of Portrait of a Girl. 

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Gallery view of the Modigliani Up Close exhibition, showing Amedeo Modigliani's Reclining Nude, 1917, from the collection of the Metropolitan Museum of Art.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022)  Amedeo Modigliani's Standing Nude (Elvira), c. 1918. Oil on Canvas: 36 1/4 x 23 5/8 in. (92 x 60 cm.) Kunstmuseum – Bern, Switzerland.   

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Gallery view of the Modigliani Up Close exhibition. Patron is examining Modigliani's Portrait of Jeanne Hébuterne, 1918

Amedeo Modigliani Italian (1884-1920) Blue Eyes (Portrait of Madame Jeanne Hébuterne), 1917. Oil on canvas:  21 1/2 x 16 7/8 inches (54.6 x 42.9 cm) Philadelphia Museum of Art, The Samuel S. White 3rd and Vera White Collection, 1967. #1967-30-59

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Detail of Amedeo Modigliani's Self-Portrait, 1919. Oil on canvas:  39 3/8 x 25 37/8 inches (100 x 64.5 cm)  Museu of Art Contemporanea, Universidade de Sao Paulo.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Amedeo Modigliani's The Boy, c.1919. Oil on canvas: 36 1/4 x 23 3/4 inches (92.1 x 60.3 cm) Indianopolis Museum of Art, Gift of Mrs. Julian Bobbs in memory of Wiliam Ray Adams, 46.22

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Amedeo Modigliani's Head, 1911-12, from the Guggenheim Museum collection.