Showing posts with label Amedeo Modigliani. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Amedeo Modigliani. Show all posts

Saturday, September 6, 2025

Art Eyewitness Essay: "Mirror of the Soul", Reflections on the Paris to Provence exhibit at the Barnes Foundation

 

"Mirror of the Soul"
     Reflections on the Barnes Foundation's Paris to Provence Exhibition


Text by Ed Voves
Original Photography by Anne Lloyd

In a December 1885 letter to his brother, Theo, Vincent van Gogh composed one of his most poignant statements on his aims as an artist:

"I'd rather paint people's eyes than cathedrals," Van Gogh stated, "for there's something in the eyes that isn't in the cathedral ... to my mind the soul of a person ... is more interesting."

While reading this heartfelt statement, one almost senses that the Dutch painter will continue his reflections with a paraphrase of the often-quoted proverb, "the eyes are the mirror of the soul."

Van Gogh did not pursue the eyes/soul theme or use the analogy of mirror in his 1885 letter to Theo. Earlier, in 1877, he did write in this vein to his brother - as we will discuss momentarily. But when I stood before Van Gogh's portrait of Joseph-Etienne Roulin, on view in a special exhibition at the Barnes Foundation in Philadelphia, these words soon came to mind and have been much in my thoughts since then.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025)
 Vincent van Gogh's The Postman (Joseph-Etienne Roulin),1889

Van Gogh's "Postman" was the anchor work of art in a spectacular four-painting ensemble in the just concluded From Paris to Provence exhibition at the Barnes Foundation in Philadelphia. In the Art Eyewitness review of this wonderful exhibit, I commented on the special insights afforded to this portrait by a change from its normal Barnes Method presentation. I won't belabor that point further.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025)
Gallery view of Paris to Provence, showing
 Van Gogh's Still Life (1888), The Smoker (1888), The Postman (1889) 
and Houses and Figure (1890).

Oddly enough, it was not the way that Joseph-Etienne Roulin was hung in the exhibition that occasioned my reflections on the eyes of this iconic portrait. Instead, it was a very unusual design feature in the layout of Paris to Provence in the Roberts Gallery of the Barnes which led to a train of thought which, to be honest, I had not been expecting.  



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025) 
Gallery view of Paris to Provence at the Barnes Foundation, showing
 an example of a "cut-out" or "window" exhibition feature

Known colloquially as "cut-outs" or "windows", these openings in gallery walls create lines of sight which can totally transform exhibit spaces. The Met used this technique to brilliant effect in its 2022 Winslow Homer exhibition.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022)
 Gallery view of the Winslow Homer: Crosscurrents exhibit at The Met

Instead of keeping us "imprisoned" within four walls and a ceiling, the special exhibition gallery now opens our eyes and minds to unusual sights, unorthodox angles of observation and unexpected impressions and thoughts. This process sounds more dramatic than it is in practice, which transpires at several degrees below our conscious awareness.

Yet, these "cut-outs" can powerfully affect our perception and help transform a visual encounter with works of art into a visionary experience.

For that to happen, we need to augment the influence of sophisticated design techniques like "cut-outs" with an appreciation of the work of art we are examining. This includes the social and spiritual realms which the artist and his subject inhabit, as well as the exterior setting around them.  

To help us comprehend this complex interplay of outer environment and inner character traits, another quote from Vincent van Gogh is in order. This reflection dates to 1877, when Van Gogh worked in an art dealership in London. In a letter to his brother, Theo, Van Gogh wrote,

 "The souls of places seem to enter the souls of men, so often from a barren, dreary region there emerges a lively, ardent and profound faith. As the place, so the man. The soul is a mirror first, and only then a seat of feeling."   

To test Van Gogh's theories on how the circumstances of the world around us enter into the "souls of men", let's compare the Barnes Foundation's portrait of Joseph-Etienne Roulin with two others which the Dutch artist painted of the French postal official (of a total of six).    

Shortly after arriving in Arles during the winter of 1888, Van Gogh became acquainted with Joseph-Etienne Roulin (1841-1903) and established a close friendship. Early on, he painted an impressive, almost heroic-scale, portrait of Roulin in his dark blue postal uniform, which gave him the air of a rugged sea-captain. 



Vincent van Gogh, Postman Joseph Roulin, 1888

This portrait, one of the treasures of the Museum of Fine Arts Boston, presents  Roulin in an introspective mood. His eyes are not focused on Van Gogh, but looking inward. That is certainly not the case with a tightly-cropped portrait of Roulin, painted around the same time. It has the hard, almost defensive, stare of a passport photo.

It is this second work, from the collection of the Detroit Institute of Art, which best serves as a foil to the Barnes portrait of Roulin, which was painted in the spring of 1889. The two works, studied in contrast, exemplify Van Gogh's 1877 reflections on how the "soul is a mirror first, and only then a seat of feeling." 
  


Van Gogh's Portrait of the Postman Joseph Roulin, 1888,
 from the Detroit Institute of Art, (left) contrasted with the Barnes Foundation's The Postman (Joseph-Etienne Roulin), 1889. 

We know from Van Gogh's letters to Theo that it took him a while to get the measure of Roulin. Initially, he matter-of-factly described Roulin as a "man more interesting than most." 

By the time he painted Roulin in the spring of 1889. Van Gogh's tone had completely changed. Roulin had devotedly aided him during the terrible emotional breakdown triggered by the dispute with Gauguin. Even after he was transferred to duty in Marseilles, Roulin returned to Arles to visit Van Gogh, as he struggled to regain control of his life. Now, Roulin is described as having "the salient gravity and a tenderness for me such as an old soldier might have for a younger one." 
  



Gravity and tenderness, along with concern, sorrow and perhaps, a touch of fear. These emotions are visibly present in the "mirror" of Roulin's eyes. An intelligent man, with considerable life experience, Roulin likely suspected that Van Gogh's recovery would be a difficult process. 

There can be absolutely no doubt that the experience of his friendship with Roulin  had registered in Van Gogh's soul as "a seat of feeling." Van Gogh signed the Barnes Foundation portrait, "Vincent." It was the only one of his six portraits of Roulin to be signed. 

Van Gogh captured the essence of Roulin's character and inner spirit, making this work one of the greatest portraits in European art during the "long" 19th century. Having acknowledged Van Gogh's achievement, it also needs to be emphasized that From Paris to Provence gave plenty of scope to his contemporaries as portrait painters. Renoir, Cezanne, Gauguin and later Modigliani and Soutine, each in their unique way, devoted themselves to depicting their subjects - body and soul. 


    

The opening gallery of Paris to Provence presented a choice selection of portraits by Renoir, a portrait by Cézanne of his wife (which, like many a Cézanne, seems more of a work-in-progress than a finished painting) and an intriguing genre scene by Manet. All are works of enduring merit. 



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025)
 Gallery view of the Paris to Provence exhibition, showing Renoir's Portrait of 
Jeanne Durand-Ruel, 1876

Given our theme of the eyes as "mirror of the soul,"  Renoir's portraits of two young girls, each the daughter of a prominent art dealer, command our attention.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025)
 Details of Renoir's Portrait of Jeanne Durand-Ruel, 1876, &
Girl with a Jump Rope: Portrait of Delphine Legrand, 1876

The girl on the left, Jeanne Durand-Ruel (1870-1914), was the daughter of Paul Durand-Ruel, the principal dealer of Manet and the Impressionists, including Renoir. On the right is Delphine Legrand, whose father, Alphonse Legrand, helped organize the Second Impressionist Exposition. This occurred in 1876, the year Renoir painted both portraits.

Renoir is said to have left the choice of clothing to the subjects who sat for their portraits. In the case of these children, the selection would have been made by their parents. The decision to dress the six-year old Jeanne in a bare-shouldered ball dress seems out-of-character for a level-headed business man and staunch Catholic like Durand-Ruel. Whatever motivated the choice of this dress, the result was to make little Jeanne look "living-doll" cute but also vulnerable, rather than grown-up and beautiful.

The blue smock, worn by Delphine, was a more sensible choice. Even grasping a jump-rope, she projects a mature personna. Looking at Delphine Legrand, one senses that this little girl is quite capable of handling herself in her social milieu.




Close-study of the faces and eyes of Jeanne and Delphine confirm what marvelous portraits these are. Renoir succeeded in capturing the real character of each girl and evoking their individual souls as "a seat of feeling." Jeanne's eyes are compelling and appealing; Delphine's are alert, aware and self-assured.

Or so it seems - and this is an important point to consider.

If we continue to hearken-back to the proverb, "the eyes are the mirror of the soul," we need to reflect on what this means. Proverbs, like the Oracle of Delphi, are open to interpretation. 

Who is reflected in the mirror of Jeanne's and Delphine's eyes? The young girls themselves? Renoir, who painted them? We, the art lovers who study them?



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025)
 Cézanne's Madam Cézanne, 1888-1890, Barnes Foundation

Continuing in this train of thought, who is mirrored in the dull, dark eyes of Madam Cézanne? Displayed in the same gallery as the Renoir portraits just described, Cézanne's painting appears to come from a completely different artistic convention and an alien way of thinking.

Cézanne could paint endearing and character-affirming portraits - when he was moved to do so. He demonstrated his versatility with Madam Cezanne with Her Hair Down, from the collection of the Philadelphia Museum of Art. This was created shortly after the Barnes Foundation portrait with its grim, sullen expression, dating to 1890. 


                                                                                                                      
Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025) 
Cézanne's Madam Cézanne with Her Hair Down, 1890
 Philadelphia Museum of Art collection

Cézanne's rationale for depicting the human countenance according to the dictates of mood and feeling is memorably described  by his biographer, Alex Danchev:

A Cézanne portrait is more a thereness than a likeness. The mature Cézanne scorned mere likeness ... The portraits he preferred were the ones that showed temperament...

Inscrutable though the Barnes' portrait of Madame Cézanne may appear, we should resist concluding that personal factors or traces of marital discord influenced the way her husband depicted her. Cézanne had other motives. He was pushing art into uncharted regions, toward discovering a "thereness." 

Sentimentality had little place in Cézanne's artistic calculations. He adored his son, Paul. Yet the numerous portraits and sketches of Paul displayed in the National Gallery exhibit, Cézanne's Portraits (2018), and MOMA's Cézanne Drawing (2021) feature a circumscribed range of emotions much like those in  paintings of his mother. No beaming eyes or charming smiles that I can recall.

Instead of sentimentality in his portraits, Cézanne responded to sensations.

"I paint as I see, as I feel," Cézanne declared early in his career, "and I have very strong sensations."

It was these sensations and Cézanne's rigorous determination to depict them on his canvas which drew the attention of the succeeding generation of artists to follow his example, if not his techniques.

In the final gallery of From Paris to Provence, the legacy of Renoir, Van Gogh and - especially - Cézanne was seized-upon and radically re-envisioned by the School of Paris artists. 


Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025)
 View of the final gallery of From Paris to Provence, showing (from left) Modigliani's Girl with a Polka-Dot Blouse (1919), Soutine's Woman in Blue (1919) & Modigliani's Portrait of the Red-Headed Woman (1918)

Of this avant-garde group, Modigliani and Soutine worked with an almost reckless disregard for convention and their own health. They sought to integrate new influences into the art of portraiture - African masks, unsettling theories about human thought, emotion and sexuality, the impact of World War I - to promote the grand traditions of French art for a new century.

To  a remarkable degree, the School of Paris painters, with hardly a Frenchman in their ranks, made a lasting impact on the world of art.                                            



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025)
Details of portraits by Amadeo Modigliani and Chaim Soutine: Modigliani's Portrait of the Red-Headed Woman (1918)& Girl with a Polka-Dot Blouse (1919); Soutine's Woman in Blue (1919)

By the time this essay is posted, all of the works of art displayed in From Paris to Provence will have been rehung in their accustomed places on the gallery walls of the Barnes. Most had not been moved from their prescribed configuration since the 1993 international exhibition of Barnes Foundation works of art.  

Van Gogh's "Postman" will return to its cramped position behind an 18th century Windsor chair and Delphine Legrand will hop and skip with her jumping rope over a painted wooden chest, made by Pennsylvania Dutch craftsmen in 1792.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025)
 Visitors to the Barnes Foundation, viewing works of art in the Main Room, north wall, of the museum

However, don't expect the situation at the Barnes to be exactly as it was before From Paris to Provence. This is especially true, if you had the good fortune to visit this superb exhibition. 

Once you look in the mirror of a person's eyes and catch a glimpse of their soul - or a reflection of your own - things are never quite the same again.

***

Text: Copyright of Ed Voves, all rights reserved                                  

Original photography, copyright of Anne Lloyd

All works of art, unless otherwise noted are from the Barnes Foundation collection


Introductory Image:
Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025) Detail of Pierre-August Renoir's Portrait of Jeanne Durand-Ruel, 1876.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025) Vincent van Gogh's The Postman (Joseph-Etienne Roulin), 1889. Oil on canvas: 25 7/8 x 21 3/4 in. (65.7 x 55.2 cm).

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025) Gallery view of Paris to Provence at the Barnes Foundation, showing four paintings by Vincent van Gogh: Still Life (1888), The Smoker (1888), The Postman (1889) and Houses and Figure (1890).

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025) Gallery view of Paris to Provence at the Barnes Foundation, showing an example of a "cut-out" or "window" exhibition feature.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Gallery view of the Winslow Homer: Crosscurrents exhibition at the Metropolitan Museum of Art

Vincent van Gogh (Dutch, 1853-1890) Postman Joseph Roulin, 1888. Oil on canvas: 32 x 25 3/4 in. (81.3 x 65.4 cm). Museum of Fine Arts Boston. 

Vincent van Gogh (Dutch, 1853-1890) Portrait of the Postman Joseph Roulin, 1888. Oil on canvas: 25 9/16 x 19 7/8 in. (65 x 50.5cm). Detroit Institute of Art. 

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025) Gallery view of the Paris to Provence exhibition, showing exhibition  entrance and Pierre-Auguste Renoir's Woman with a Fan.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025) Gallery view of the Paris to Provence exhibition, showing Pierre-Auguste Renoir's Portrait of Jeanne Durand-Ruel, 1876.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025) Details of Renoir's Portrait of Jeanne Durand-Ruel, 1876. 44 7/8 x 29 1/8 in. (114 x 74 cm)  and Girl with a Jump Rope: Portrait of Delphine Legrand, 1876. Oil on canvas: 42 1/4 x 27 15/16 in. (107.3 x 71 cm) 

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025) Cézanne's Madam Cézanne, 1888-1890. Oil on canvas: 36 1/2 × 28 3/4 in. (92.7 × 73 cm) 

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025) Cézanne's Madam Cézanne with Her Hair Down, 1890. the collection of the Philadelphia Museum of Art. Oil on canvas: 24 3/8 × 20 1/8 in. (61.9 × 51.1 cm) 

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025) Installation view of the final gallery of From Paris to Provence, showing (from left) Modigliani's Girl with a Polka-Dot Blouse (1919), Soutine's Woman in Blue (1919) and Modigliani's Portrait of the Red-Headed Woman (1918).

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025) Detail of portraits by Amadeo Modigliani and Chaim Soutine: Modigliani's Portrait of the Red-Headed Woman (1918). Oil on canvas: overall: 45 11/16 x 28 3/4 in. (116 x 73 cm); Modigliani's Girl with a Polka-Dot Blouse (1919). Oil on canvas: 45 1/2 x 28 3/4 in. (c 115.6 x 73 cm); Soutine's Woman in Blue (1919). Oil on canvas: 39 1/2 x 23 3/4 in. (100.3 x 60.3 cm)

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025) Visitors to the Barnes Foundation, viewing works of art in the Main Room, north wall, of the museum.

Sunday, January 8, 2023

Art Eyewitness Looks at the Art Scene in 2022


Reflections on the Art Scene during 2022

Text by Ed Voves

Original Photography by Anne Lloyd

If it is possible to savor the events of a year like a fine wine, then 2022 was truly a vintage experience for Art Eyewitness. Indeed, the number of outstanding exhibitions was so great, especially during the final quarter of the year, that several reviews are still waiting to be posted.

During 2022, Art Eyewitness covered outstanding exhibitions of the work of Sean Scully, Winslow Homer, John Singer Sargent, Edward Hopper, Winold Reiss, Hans Holbein, Maxfield Parrish, Henri Matisse and Amedeo Modigliani. Just to name a few.


Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Gallery view of the Edward Hopper's New York exhibit at the Whitney Museum, New York City

2022 was also a year to celebrate great institutions. December 2022 marked the 100th anniversary of the Barnes Foundation; November was the 20th year since the Neue Galerie opened its welcoming doors to art lovers eager to see beloved works of German and Austrian art like Gustav Klimt's The Woman in Gold. 


                                  Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022)                                      Gallery view of the Barnes Foundation, showing Henri Matisse's The Dance mural, 1932-33.

The Barnes Foundation and the Neue Galerie have provided many memorable "art moments" and Art Eyewitness essays celebrating them will be forthcoming in the new year.

Ironically, the most significant Art Eyewitness encounter with great art during 2022 took place in a train station rather than a museum gallery.

This "learning experience" occurred on November 19th, the Saturday of the Philadelphia Marathon weekend. Oblivious of the scheduled race, my wife, Anne, and I ventured to downtown Philadelphia for an early morning photo shoot. 

To our surprise, all of our return bus connections were cancelled or redirected because of the Marathon. To get home, we had to travel via train from 30th Street Station.

 


Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) 
The Pennsylvania Railroad World War II Memorial,
30th Street R.R. Station, Philadelphia, PA

Living in Philadelphia, Anne and I are no strangers to 30th Street Station. In the main concourse of 30th Street is an imposing monument to the employees of the Pennsylvania Railroad company who were killed during World War II. Incredibly, the names of 1,307 men from the "Pennsy" are listed on the bronze plaques at the base of the statue. Think of it, 1,307 human lives lost to war, all workers from just one company!

From atop the base of the Pennsylvania Railroad World War II Memorial, rises The Angel of the Resurrection. This 28-foot bronze sculpture depicts St. Michael the Archangel embracing the soul of a dead soldier or seaman, one of the casualties of the second "War to end all Wars." 

This deeply moving work of art was sculpted by Walker Hancock (1901–1998), long-time instructor at the Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts. Hancock, one of the "Monuments Men" who helped save works of art stolen by the Nazis, created a masterpiece which literally halts one in their tracks - if you take the time to stop and look. 

That's the problem with Hancock's Angel of the Resurrection. The angel looms-up over the vast concourse, its wings folded behind, cradling the soul of the dead G.I. And we - whose freedom was safeguarded by this sacrifice - rush by the statue to hail a taxi or run for a bus.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) 
Side view of Walker Hancock's Angel of the Resurrection

I have stopped, from time-to-time, to admire The Angel of the Resurrection. Mostly, though, I pass the winged guardian in a late afternoon hurry. What was different on that November Saturday was the time of day when we were at 30th Street - a little before noon - and the light conditions. Sunlight was pouring through the South-facing, four-story widows.

The light bathing the two figures set the left side of the statue aglow. The bronze wing, facial features, the robed figure of the angel and the nude torso of the slain warrior were caressed by the southern light, contrasting with the veil of shadows on the opposite side. This incredible contrast, almost conflict, between light and dark, calls to mind a state of war and the ultimate sacrifice of the citizen soldiers whose names appear below.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) 
Detail of Walker Hancock's Angel of the Resurrection

The shock-effect of viewing Walker Hancock's Angel of the Resurrection was made even more profound when we looked at the photos Anne took. Being "in the right place, at the right time" assumed a deeper significance with later reflection. This effect keeps on increasing in the vein of thought and feeling, the more we think and feel about it.

In short, the attention-grabbing sight of The Angel of the Resurrection on a Saturday morning in November 2022 perfectly illustrates the "Art Moment." From the retina of our eye to our brain to our soul, Art becomes part of our lives. 

The year 2022 brought quite a few of these moments, along with the joy of returning to art museums and galleries, enjoying the company of fellow art lovers and observing their evident pleasure.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Gallery view of the Philadelphia Museum of Art, showing patrons viewing Claude Monet's Japanese Footbridge and the Water Lily Pool, Giverny, 1899

Over and over again, Anne and I encountered large, enthusiastic crowds in the galleries. The long lines of visitors waiting to see the Matisse in the 1930's exhibit at the Philadelphia Museum of Art, during the Christmas-New Year holiday week, was truly a sight to behold.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022)
 Interior view of the Philadelphia Museum of Art, Dec. 28, 2022, showing patrons waiting to see the Matisse in the 1930's exhibit

We especially noted large numbers of children and young people in the galleries during 2022. I was particularly touched to see a dad explaining a  painting to a very-young art lover at the Whitney Museum's Edward Hopper’s New York exhibition (October 19, 2022–March 5, 2023). 



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Gallery view of Edward Hopper's New York, showing Hopper's House at Dusk, 1935

Crowded galleries were also a feature of the Met's long-awaited exhibit, The Tudors: Art and Majesty. But the sight of a young woman, deep in thought before a portrait of the much maligned monarch, Queen Mary, is one of the most vivid memories I have of this memorable exhibition.


                                     Ed Voves, Photo (2022)                                    Gallery view of The Tudors: Art and Majesty

In many ways, the Metropolitan Museum of Art set the tone for 2022 with a major exhibition, earlier in the year, Winslow Homer: Crosscurrents. The exhibit later traveled to the National Gallery in London.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022)
Gallery view of Winslow Homer: Crosscurrents
at the Metropolitan Museum of Art

Born in Boston, Winslow Homer (1836-1910) first made his mark as an artist for popular magazines like Harper's Weekly shortly before the outbreak of the Civil War. From being a talented recorder of current events, Homer immortalized America's "new birth of freedom."



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022)
 Winslow Homer's A Sharp-Shooter on Picket Duty (detail), 1863

The drawings Homer made at the battle front and the paintings he produced on his return are some of the most important visual records of the Civil War. The 1861-65 conflict marked Homer for life - even his lyrical paintings of children produced in the years afterward were a reaction to the horror of the war.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022)
 Winslow Homer's The Gale, 1883-1893

The aftershock of the Civil War and the difficult realities of life during the Gilded Age infused Homer's oeuvre. His seascapes were beset by storms and shipwrecks, culminating in The Gulf Stream (1899). 



Ed Voves, Photo (2022)
 Winslow Homer's The Gulf Stream, 1899

This painting of the stoical courage of an African-American sailor in the face of calamity anchored the Met's exhibit. There seldom was a time during my two visits to Winslow Homer: Crosscurrents when there was not a throng of fascinated visitors grouped before it.

Adversity is a feature of all great artists' lives, usually at the beginning of their careers, with a "dry" period after some hard-earned success. That was certainly true of Henri Matisse during the late 1920's. While his paintings were earning him a comfortable income, Matisse was increasingly condemned by his fellow Modernists for producing "play safe" works recalling Old Masters like Ingres.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) 
Gallery view of Matisse in the 1930's at the Philadelphia Museum of Art, showing The Chant Fireplace mural (1938)

Matisse in the 1930's at the Philadelphia Museum of Art (October 20, 2022–January 29, 2023) details the great French master's decade-long campaign of reinvention. The curators of the Philadelphia Museum of Art and the two French museums where the exhibition will travel later in 2023 collected a huge array of signature Matisse "Thirties" paintings but also works of sculpture, drawings for limited edition books and set designs for the ballet. 

 Art lovers able to come to Philly for Matisse in the 1930's have the opportunity to see the key work of Matisse's "decisive" decade, which will not be travelling to France. This is the mural, The Dance, created for Dr. Albert Barnes. It's on view - permanently - at the Barnes Foundation, a couple blocks from the Philadelphia Museum of Art.  



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) 
Gallery view of the Modigliani Up Close exhibition at the Barnes Foundation, showing Amadeo Modigliani's Head, 1911-12

Also on view at the Barnes is the exhibit, Modigliani Up Close. This examination of Modigliani's brief career did not stress his personal difficulties and private demons - of which he had many. Instead, the curators analyzed Modigliani's technique and his use of blocks of limestone, secured from Parisian building sites, and second-hand canvases to create a new "temple of beauty."

Although Modigliani's brief, tortured life was not used as a morality tale by the Barnes curators, there is one lesson which it is appropriate to mention here. Artists must work with a finite supply of time as well as paint, canvas, clay and stone. "Modi" had very little time to make his mark. The same is often true for art scholars and museum curators. 

Alan Solomon (1920-1970) had less than three years at the Jewish Museum of New York to propel the rather staid museum into the vanguard of 1960's-style Modernism. The board of directors of the Jewish Museum were often perplexed by the dynamic Solomon's support for up-and-coming artists like Richard Rauschenberg, Roy Lichtenstein and Marjorie Strider. But as shown in the sensational 2022 exhibit, New York, 1962-1964, the effect of Solomon's controversial tenure was transformative. 



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) 
Gallery view of New York:1962-1964, showing Roy Lichtenstein's Thinking of Him,1963, & Marjorie Strider's Girl with Radish,1963

New York, 1962-1964 shared a feature with all of the exhibitions mentioned here. At least in part, these phenomenal displays of art were planned and organized during the Covid-19 pandemic years. In the case of New York, 1962-1964, preparing the exhibition was made vastly more difficult by the death of the great Italian scholar leading the project. Germano Celent died from Covid-19 before seeing the project to completion. The 2022 exhibition at the Jewish Museum was a worthy testimonial.

2022 is already in the rear-view mirror and there is much to look forward to as we prepare for 2023. I don't have a crystal ball to predict the future events. But, as the sun comes up on a new year and the hard-working staff of the museum PR departments begin to post notices of coming exhibitions, I can share a few tips on what's in store for the coming year.


Anne Lloyd, Photo (2023)
 Winter Dawn and Prism, January 2023

A host of exhibits are being prepared to honor Picasso, fifty years after his death in 1973. The Guggenheim has one planned, Young Picasso in Paris, May 12, 2023 - August 7, 2023. Georgia O’Keeffe: To See Takes Time will debut at MOMA, April 09, 2023 – August 12, 2023. An exhibition of ancient art, which I am particularly looking forward to, entitled Tree and Serpent, Buddhist Art in Early India, is scheduled to open July 17, 2023 - December 3, 2023 at the Met. 

I have all three of these exhibits marked on my calendar, but I am finding it hard to let go of the fabulous 2022 exhibitions, especially since some still have a few weeks to go and I have reviews to post!

So, let's take a few more moments to reflect on 2022. Let's summon up our memories of great art and great people. Let's not rush by, ignoring The Angel of the Resurrection and other memorials and testimonials to those who have sacrificed so much for our welfare.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) 
 Gallery view of Matisse in the 1930's, showing two versions of Henri Matisse's Window at Tahiti, 1935

I am going to pause and meditate on the miracle of human creativity. I am going to sit down and meditate, like the fellow in the jaunty jacket at the Matisse in the 1930's exhibit (above). 

 "Let Freedom Ring!" That is what the letters spell-out on his colorful jacket. I am going to take some time to think on those words, to remember and to be grateful for the gifts of art and life and liberty. 

***

Text: Copyright of Ed Voves, all rights reserved                                      Images copyright of Anne Lloyd, all rights reserved.

Introductory Image: Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Walker Hancock's The Angel of the Resurrection (detail) from the Pennsylvania Railroad World War II Memorial, 30th Street Station, Philadelphia, PA., August 10, 1952. 

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Gallery view of Edward Hopper's New York at the Whitney Museum, showing Edward Hopper's Self-Portrait,1925–30. Oil on canvas: 25 3/8 × 20 3/8 in. (64.5 × 51.8 cm). 

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022)  Gallery view of the Barnes Foundation, Philadelphia, PA., showing Henri Matisse's The Dance mural, 1932-33.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) The Pennsylvania Railroad World War II Memorial. Walker Hancock's Angel of the Resurrection, sculpted, 1950, and dedicated, August 10, 1952 at 30th Street Station, Philadelphia, PA. Bronze statue: 28 ft (8.53 m.) on 11 ft. (3.35) black granite base. The base has two inscribed dedications and four bronze plaques listing the  1,307 Pennsylvania Railroad employees who were killed in World War II.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Gallery view of the Philadelphia Museum of Art, showing patrons viewing Claude Monet's Japanese Footbridge and the Water Lily Pool, Giverny, 1899.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Interior view of the Philadelphia Museum of Art, December 28, 2022, showing patrons waiting to see the Matisse in the 1930's exhibition

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Gallery view of Edward Hopper's New York, showing Hopper's House at Dusk, 1935.

Ed Voves, Photo (2022)  Gallery view of The Tudors: Art and Majesty, showing Patron viewing Hans Eworth's Mary I, 1554. Collection of the Society of Antiquaries, London

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Gallery view of Winslow Homer: Crosscurrents at the Metropolitan Museum of Art

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Winslow Homer's A Sharp-Shooter on Picket Duty (detail), 1863. Oil on canvas: 12 1/4 x 16 1/2 in. Portland (Maine) Museum of Art #1992.41

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Winslow Homer's The Gale, 1883-1893. Oil on canvas: 30 1/4 x 48 5/16 in. (76.8 x 122.7 cm)  Worcester Museum of Art, Museum Purchase. #1916.48

Ed Voves, Photo (2022) Winslow Homer's The Gulf Stream, 1899. Oil on canvas: 28 1/8 x 49 1/8 in. (71.4 x 124.8 cm). The Metropolitan Museum of Art

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022)  Gallery view of the Matisse in the 1930's exhibition at the Philadelphia Museum of Art, showing The Chant Fireplace mural (1938) painted by Matisse for Nelson Rockefeller.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Gallery view of the Modigliani Up Close exhibition at the Barnes Foundation, showing Amadeo Modigliani's Head, 1911-12. Limestone: 25 x 6 x 8 1/4 in. ( 63.5 x 15.2 x21 cm.) Guggenheim Museum. #55.1421

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Gallery view of New York:1962-1964, showing Roy Lichtenstein's Thinking of Him, 1963. Collection of Yale University Art Gallery, New Haven, and Marjorie Strider's Girl with Radish,1963. Ruth and Theodore Baum Collection.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2023) Winter Dawn and Prism, January 2023. 

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022)  Gallery view of the Matisse in the 1930's exhibition at the Philadelphia Museum of Art, showing two versions of Henri Matisse's Window at Tahiti, 1935.