Showing posts with label Human portraits. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Human portraits. Show all posts

Monday, February 10, 2025

Art Eyewitness Review: The Mysterious Fayum Portraits and The World of Late Antiquity

 

The Mysterious Fayum Portraits: Faces from Ancient Egypt

By Euphrosyne Doxiadis

Thames & Hudson/248 pages/$50

Reviewed by Ed Voves

It is always a wonderful occasion to catch sight of a familiar, smiling face in the crowded, bustling galleries of the Metropolitan Museum of Art.

Whenever I visit The Met, I can always count on such a friendly reunion in the first floor, Ancient Egyptian wing. There to greet me is a beaming adolescent boy named Eutyches and a stylish, vivacious young woman whose luminous dark eyes outshine the gilded wreath which adorns her hair.



Fayum portraits, from left, The Boy Eutyches, c. 100-150, and Young Woman with a Gilded Wreath, c. 120-150 © Metropolitan Museum of Art

Alas, Eutyches and the unnamed young woman are no longer “in the flesh.”  They died during the era when the power of the Roman Empire was at its apogee, between the years 100-150. However, both are very much present, “in the spirit” by virtue of the extraordinary portraits which once were affixed to their caskets.

The amazing likenesses of Eutyches and the golden-wreathed woman are known to art history as Fayum portraits. Painted on thin wooden panels, these images were made to last for eternity, along with the souls of those they depict. A classic study, just republished by Thames & Hudson, is a moving testimonial to these bids for immortality.

The Mysterious Fayum Portraits: Faces from Ancient Egypt was originally published in 1995. The author, Euphrosyne Doxiades, is an accomplished artist, expert in the encaustic wax painting technique which was used to create many of the Fayum portraits.

The late 1990’s were marked by a revival of interest in Fayum funerary art, sparked by a major British Museum exhibition of these ancient paintings. During the winter of 2000, a major collaboration of the British Museum and The Met brought Ancient Faces: Mummy Portraits from Ancient Egypt to New York. 

                                                                                      


Gallery view of Ancient Faces: Mummy Portraits from Ancient Egypt
at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2000 

Doxiadis contributed a short chapter on encaustic painting to the catalog of this exhibition. Mysterious Faces is her own, independent study. It ranks as the most definitive book on the Fayum portraits yet published– and likely to remain so thanks to this impressive, lavishly illustrated volume.

Doxiadis analyzed mummies and mummy portraits from a wide range of museum collections in Egypt, Europe and the U.S. Drawing upon her own artistic expertise, Doxiadis  writes of the artists who created the Fayum portraits:

The methods used by the painters are of the greatest importance not only for the study of the portraits themselves but because they can tells us more about the technique of the Hellenistic tradition as a whole, of which so few works have survived. The mummy portraits provide a link between the painting of antiquity and that of Byzantium, and it is in the techniques used that this continuity can be seen most clearly.


Anne Lloyd, (Photo 2019)
Portrait of a Young Woman in Red (detail), c. 90-120 AD

The welcome arrival of the new edition of Mysterious Faces was graced by a stroke of incredible luck. In December 2022, a major archaeological discovery in the Faiyum region, located 62 miles southwest of Cairo, unearthed a mud-brick necropolis with intact mummies from the Roman-period and several Fayum portraits. 

These "new" portraits came to light, too late for inclusion in the second edition of Mysterious Faces. Their discovery, however, adds a note of timely relevance to this insightful account of Egyptian art during the final centuries of ancient times. 




The era of the late ancient world is the subject of another classic book, recently republished, The World of Late Antiquity by Peter Brown will also be reviewed in this Art Eyewitness post in order to probe the legacy of the Fayum portraits.

The process of deliberately preserving the bodies of deceased pharaohs and members of the Egyptian nobility through mummification began about 2,600 B.C. By the time that painted images of the dead - which we call Fayum portraits - became an accepted technique, the elaborate process of preparing Egyptians for eternal life had been going on for over two millennia!

The Faiyum (or Fayoum) Oasis is one of the most historic sites in the story of Ancient Egypt. It was originally known as Shedit or sea because of its vast expanse. By the time Greek rule of Egypt began with the arrival of Alexander the Great, the waters of the oasis had greatly diminished. With the construction of an elaborate system of irrigation channels, however, the area remained one of the most bountiful agricultural regions of Egypt.

The prosperity generated from the grain trade made for a wider distribution of wealth. This in turn enabled more people than kings and nobles to prepare their mortal remains and ka, their soul, for eternal life. 

Although Fayum portraits were made in other regions of Egypt, the Faiyum Oasis favored the creation and survival of this astonishing art form. The oasis was ringed with hilly terrain which remained dry during the annual inundation of the Nile Valley, which extended to low-lying areas of the oasis. On these secure uplands, the mummified remains of the deceased were interred. 

Two compelling Fayum portraits, both from the Getty Museum, provide a fascinating insights to the varied levels of artistic technique and resources devoted to Fayum portraiture - and the people immortalized by these paintings.


Mummy Portait of a Woman (Isidora), c. 100 AD

The first image is of an aristocratic lady named Isidora, who lived around the year 100. Isidora's portrait was obviously painted by an accomplished master, who lavished pricey encaustic pigments on this exquisite work. Four different shades of red were used to convey the coloration of her sensuous lips. Isidora's hair style is an exacting rendition of the tightly-braided, plaited bun favored by Roman ladies during the reign of the Emperor Trajan (98-117).


Mummy Shroud with Painted Portait of a Boy, c. 150-250 AD

By contrast, the almost-expressionless face of a boy with a falcon resting on his shoulder was created "on the cheap." Just tempora paint was used, applied directly on a linen shroud. (Isidora, and most other Fayum portraits, were painted on expensive limewood panels). But we should not judge this as a "primitive" work of art. 

As Doxiadis notes, in comparison with other Fayum portraits, this work has an appeal of its own, which modern art is helping us evaluate:

A hundred years after most of the portraits were discovered, now that we have seen Paul Klee, we are better able to appreciate the schematic and seemingly unsophisticated qualities of portraits such as this; stylistic differences do not necessarily mean differences in artistic merit.

Though Isidora and the falcon-bearing youth appear to be from separate schools of art, both are Greek in spirit. The painterly-style of the Fayum portraits resulted from the naturalism of Greek art, reaching back several centuries to Apelles, the renowned court painter for Alexander. Yet, this obvious fact is not all that easy to grasp. Fayum portraits, in many respects, seem more Egyptian than Greek.

Except for a very few exceptions, Greek painting from antiquity has been obliterated by the unforgiving hand of time. The arid conditions of Egypt have preserved over 1,000 Fayum portraits, making them the largest surviving body of paintings from ancient times.



Mummy with an Inserted Panel Portrait, c. 80-100, & Mummy of Artemidorus in a Cartonnage Body Caseearly 2nd century AD

The significance of the Fayum portraits is not only a matter of artistic interest. When we see Greek-style portraits applied to Egyptian mummy cases, we are witnessing a meeting of cultures on a deep spiritual level.

After Alexander's death in 323 B.C., Egyptians and Greeks resident in Egypt were ruled by the Greco-Macedonian Ptolemaic dynasty. During the generally-benign regime of the Ptolemies, both groups borrowed freely from each other. If Egyptians adopted this Greek artistic style, many Greeks were inspired by the profound concepts related to the afterlife of their new neighbors. 


l
Greek inscription on the cartonnage body case of Artemidorus,
reading "O Artemidorus, Farewell" (British Museum Collection)

From the evidence of the Fayum portraits, it is apparent that numerous Greeks buried their dead in the hope of immortality according to the rites and rituals of eternal Egypt.

Doxiadis calls the Fayum portraits "mysterious faces." One of the mysteries about them, or perhaps irony is a more accurate term, is that the heyday of Fayum funerary art occurred under the Pax Romana, established by Caesar Augustus in 31 BC. 

What interested the Romans about Egypt, particularly the Faiyum Oasis, were the abundant crops it produced. And yet, the reign of Tiberius, (AD14-37) marked the real beginning of the three century-long period when Greek artists created a human face for the Egyptian quest for immortality.



Anne Lloyd, (Photo 2019)
The Boy Eutyches (detail), c. 100-150 

There are a number of ways to approach the study of Fayum portraiture. But in a short review like this, it is important to focus on what is absolutely essential. In considering a Fayum portrait the most important feature, transcending all others, is the treatment of the eyes.

The eye figured prominently in Egyptian religious belief and practice for thousands of years. The "eye of Horus", inscribed on protective amulets, was an omnipresent feature of Egyptian life. 



Wedjat Eye Amulet,
 Third Intermediate Period, c. 1070-664 BC

Egyptian artists, in order to show the eye in its fullest and most perfect form, almost always featured it on a face in profile. Their Greek counterparts, by contrast, depicted the eye with absolute scientific fidelity. On the Fayum portraits,however, the eyes are often presented much larger in proportion to the rest of the face, than would normally be so.



Fayum portraits from the era of Hadrian & Antoninus Pius (2nd Century AD). The woman at left wears a torc from the city of Antinoopolis. 

One theory for the large, luminous eyes of the Fayum portraits contends that Greek artists were attempting to heighten a sense of soulful vitality in the face of the deceased. If so, this raises the question of the identity of the "eye of the beholder."

Since Fayum portraits were not created for display in the land of the living, the "big eyes" clearly were intended for the life to come. But were those eyes meant to be seen or to do the seeing?

When one looks at Fayum portraits in a museum gallery, you often have the peculiar sensation that Eutyches, Isidora and Artemidorus are intently peering at us. Normally, this sensation can be pleasurable, in a curious sort of way. However, when I visited the Ancient Faces exhibition at The Met in 2000, the experience was unnerving.



Gallery view of Ancient Faces: Mummy Portraits from Ancient Egypt, 
showing Portrait of a Woman in Tempora & Encaustic, AD 70-100 

To put it bluntly, I was unnerved, rattled by all of those faces of dead people. Dead people who are somehow still alive and aware - on some level - of us.



Fayum portrait of a Roman soldier, identifiable by his
 shoulder-sword belt. The portrait dates to the Antonine era, 138-192

After reading The Mysterious Fayum Portraits, I discovered that I was not alone in my reaction to an uncanny presence in these ancient works of art.

in the introduction to her book, Euphrosyne Doxiades writes:

Looking at the most beautifully painted among the Fayum portraits is a unique and enriching experience. They transgress formal, cultural and physical barriers. The depicted person lives on in spite of mortality, decay and the span of millenia... An experience I had in Berlin convinced me of the power inherent in the best of the Fayum faces: I was left in a storage room on my own with about twenty portraits, and when the door closed behind me I felt a strange sensation - that I was not alone...

The author's reaction to her Berlin storage room experience is revelatory. Doxiadis is anything but an impressionable savant. She felt the inherent power of religious works. 

For that is what the Fayum portraits were intended to be and remain so, even when displayed in museum gallery cases.

The real mystery in these "mysterious faces" is why, after a thriving three century span, the creation of Fayum portraits began to decline and eventually ceased. This "fade-out" is part of a vast shift in consciousness which - among many other significant developments - saw realistic portraiture lose its appeal over much of the world during the Middle Ages. This was especially true in regions ruled or influenced by the Byzantine (East Roman) Empire.

These complex and compelling changes of life and thought were brilliantly analyzed by Peter Brown in his 1971 book, The World of Late Antiquity. Thames & Hudson recently republished this impressive work in a fully illustrated new edition (World of Art series/239 pages/$24.95). Brown's book is essential reading for anyone interested in ancient history. What follows are some reflections, inspired by The World of Late Antiquity, on the factors which led to the eventual disappearance of Fayum portrait painting.

Symbolical imagery began to edge-aside works of naturalism during the third century. This was the Roman Empire's first great time of troubles. Ceaseless military coups and assassinations, Germanic invasions across the Rhine and Danube and the menace of a revived Persian Empire nearly brought Rome to its knees.


The Brescia Medallion
 Gold glass portrait of a family from Alexandria, c. fourth century 

Rome's political power survived, battered but resilient. So too did the traditional forms of Greco-Roman culture, including naturalistic painting. At least outwardly, that is, as testified by the Brescia Medallion (above). This miniature masterpiece, only 2.4 inches in diameter, of gold glass engraving is clearly related to Fayum portraiture.

The reassertion of Roman military power in the final years of the third century concealed hidden currents of fundamental change. An undertow of social, cultural and religious transformations included an unprecedented new conception of the nature of morality. 

This innovation in humanity's outlook was, in the words of Peter Brown, "that most fateful legacy of Zoroastrian Persia to the western world - a belief in the absolute division of the spiritual world between good and evil powers, between angels and demons."

Brown comments further:

The sharp smell of an invisible battle hung over the religious life of Late Antique man. To sin was no longer to err: it was to allow oneself to be overcome by unseen forces. To err was not to be mistaken: it was to be unconsciously manipulated by some invisible malign power. 

In this highly-charged moral atmosphere, it was no longer sufficient for an individual seeking salvation to simply sacrifice to the gods or make careful preparations to insure the transit of one's soul to the afterlife. Each person must seek the aid of a divine savior or prophet and then join in the struggle against the forces of evil, visible and invisible.



  A panel painting from Bawit, Egypt, showing Christ embracing
 St. Menas. The painting, dates to the sixth - seventh century.

Gradually, the two-thousand year traditions and rituals of Egyptian religion lost their appeal. Artists turned their skills from painting realistic portraits of the dead to imagined likenesses of Jesus and holy men like St. Menas. 

The wheels of time turned. Antiquity faded, the medieval age of monotheistic faiths took its place. The wheels of time revolved again and again. Brief years of enlightenment were followed by dark ages of war.



Art Eyewitness Image
A collage of Fayum portraits. The two right-hand panel paintings 
come from the collection of the British Museum

Interred beneath the sands surrounding the Faiyum Oasis, Eutyches, Isidora and the unnamed others slept the sleep of eternity. And then, they were awakened to grace the gallery walls of our museums. 

There they greet us with a smile or a faint look of reproach, reminding us of the kinship of all human beings, ancient and modern, living and dead.

***

Text: Copyright of Ed Voves, all rights reserved reserved                                     

Original photography, copyright of Anne Lloyd.

 Introductory Image: Cover art of The Mysterious Fayum Portraits by Euphrosyne Doxiadis. Courtesy of Thames & Hudson.

Fayum portraits:  Portrait of the Boy Eutyches, 100–150 AD. Encaustic on wood: h. 38 cm (14 15/16 in); w. 19 cm (7 1/2 in) Metropolitan Museum of Art 18.9.2. Portrait of a Young Woman with a Gilded Wreath. 120–140 AD. Encaustic on wood with gold leaf: H. 36.5 x W. 17.8 cm (14 3/8 x 7 in.) # 09.181.7 © Metropolitan Museum of Art

Gallery view of Ancient Faces: Mummy Portraits from Ancient Egypt at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2000.  © Metropolitan Museum of Art

Anne Lloyd, (Photo 2019) Portrait of a Young Woman in Red (detail), c. 90-120 AD. A.D. 90–120. Encaustic on limewood with gold leaf: H. 38.1 x W. 18.4 cm (15 x 7 1/4 in.) Metropolitan Museum of Art. # 09.181.6

Cover art of The World of Late Antiquity by Peter Brown. Courtesy of Thames & Hudson.

Mummy Portait of a Woman (Isidora), c. 100 AD.   Encaustic on linden wood, gilt, ( Entire Assemblage): 48 × 36 × 12.8 cm (18 7/8 × 14 3/16 × 5 1/16 in.) Portrait : 33.6 × 17.2 cm (13 1/4 × 6 3/4 in.) Getty Museum #81.AP.42

 Mummy Shroud with Painted Portait of a Boy, c. 150-250 AD. Tempera on linen:  62 × 52.5 cm (24 7/16 × 20 11/16 in.) Getty Museum. #75 AP 87

Mummy with an Inserted Panel Portrait, c. 80-100, AD. Mummy with an Inserted Panel Portrait of a Youth. Panel portrait: encaustic on limewood. Mummy: L. 169 cm (66 9/16 in.); W. 45 cm (17 11/16 in.); Panel as exposed: H. 38.1 cm (15 in.); W. 18 cm (7 1/16 in.) Metropolitan Museum of Art # 11.139.  Mummy of Artemidorus in a Cartonnage Body Case, early 2nd century AD. Panel Portrait: Encaustic on wood with gold leaf: British Museum #EA21810 © British Museum.

Greek inscription on the cartonnage body case of Artemidorus, reading "O Artemidorus, Farewell" (British Museum Collection) For details, see above entry.

Anne Lloyd, (Photo 2019) The Boy Eutyches (detail), c. 100-150. For full citation see above.)

 Wedjat Eye Amulet, Third Intermediate Period, c. 1070-664 BC. Faience, aragonite: L. 6.5 cm (2 9/16 in.) Metropolitan Museum of Art. # 26.7.1032

Fayum portraits from the era of Hadrian & Antoninus Pius (2nd Century AD).   Head of a Woman, c. 130 and 160 AD. Encaustic with gilded stucco on wood panel: 17 5/8 × 9 3/4 inches (44.8 × 24.8 cm) Detroit Institute of Art # 25.2. Portrait of a Woman c. 117-138 AD. Encaustic on wood: 35.3 × 22.5 × 2 cm (13 7/8 × 8 7/8 × 13/16 in.) Harvard Art Museums/ Sackler Museum # 1923.60

Gallery view of Ancient Faces: Mummy Portraits from Ancient Egypt, showing showing Portrait of a Woman in Tempora & Encaustic, AD 70-100. 

Portrait of a Roman Soldier, Antonine era, 138-192. Encaustic painting on wood: 40 x 20 cm. Myers Collection, Eton College.

The Brescia Medallion. Gold glass engraved portrait, 4th century AD. Gold leaf, enamel and glass: Diameter - 6 cm. (2.4 inches) Collection: Santa Giulia Museum in Brescia. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Galla_Placidia_(rechts)_und_ihre_Kinder.jpg

Icon of Christ embracing St. Menas, from Apollo Monestary, Bawit, Egypt, sixth- seventh century. Encaustic on panel: 57 by 57 centimetres (22.4 by 22.4 inches). Louvre Museum..

 Art Eyewitness Image  A collage of Fayum portraits, from the collections of the Metropolitan Museum of Art, the J. Paul Getty Museum and the British Museum.

 


Wednesday, December 19, 2018

Art Eyewitness Book Review: The Face and Bestiary from the British Museum



       The Face: Our Human Story by Debra Mancoff         
 Thames & Hudson/303 pages/$24.95

Bestiary: Animals in Art from the Ice Age to Our Age by Christopher Matthews
Thames & Hudson/256 pages/$24.95


Reviewed by Ed Voves

"Sir, when a man is tired of London, he is tired of life," Dr. Samuel Johnson proclaimed  to his boon companion James Boswell, "for there is in London all that life can afford."

The date was September 20, 1777. Eighteen years before Boswell recorded this famous remark, one of the prime attractions of London had opened its doors, offering examples of "all that life can afford" to Londoners and visitors alike. The world's first public museum, it was located in the Bloomsbury section of London and was called the British Museum. The name was something of a misnomer in Johnson's day and for many years afterward since there was very little on display that pertained to the British Isles.

Today, the British Museum exhibits art and artifacts from every period of history and from every continent and almost every nation of the world. This mighty institution has joined with the publishing firm, Thames and Hudson, to produce two books highlighting its vast holdings. These handsome, insightful volumes are each based upon a key theme, the human portrait and the relationship of people with animals. 

The Face: Our Human Story by Debra Mancoff and Bestiary: Animals in Art from the Ice Age to Our Age by Christopher Matthews complement each other splendidly. To an amazing degree, human beings have masked or garbed  themselves in animal-themed motifs. Furthermore, the experience of our fellow creatures in the animal kingdom has inspired and elevated the mind - and - especially - the emotions of  men and women since time immemorial.



    Marble bust of a sleeping child, possibly placed on the child's tomb,
 1st-2nd century AD

These two books are beautifully illustrated and have engaging, provocative texts. Mancoff's prose is almost poetic as she evokes the many moods of human life and the masks we wear to try and conceal our true selves:

Our faces function as a window to our thoughts and feelings and as a mirror of social attitudes and expectations; they connect our inner life to our outward experience... All these factors - meanings, identity, emotion and connection - have made the human face the most potent and persistent subject in the history of art.

Perhaps the human face is a little too potent. For that reason, humans have created masks or disguises to cover the "shocking" truth of our lives. 

     Unknown artist. Roman military parade mask, c. 2nd century AD

During the later Roman Empire, soldiers wore elaborate masks with the features of the gods of the Pantheon or Amazons (as in the above example). These masks were a feature of dress parades or dazzling displays of horsemanship rather than providing protection from enemy arrows. For the whole point was to maintain the fiction that the Celts, Germans or other "barbarians" serving in the legions were  real-live Romans, when in fact actual Romans were in ever-shorter supply.

One of the opening images of The Face is this striking, almost nightmarish, face from ancient Mexico, likely Xiuhtecuhtli of the Aztec culture, around 1500.   



    Unknown artist, The Turquoise Mosaics, c. 1400-1521


The "Turquoise Lord," Xiuhtecuhtli, is a somewhat shadowy figure in Mesoamerican myth. This frightening mask would have been worn by a temple priest in one of the many ceremonies invoking the help of the gods to nurture Aztec crops in the extremely weather-sensitive environment of Mexico.

Masks are not always intended to conceal or to overawe.  Sometimes a "change of face" denotes a major cultural or religious transition.



Unknown artist, The Satala Aphrodite (Anahita), c. 1st century BC. 

One of the most fascinating images in The Face is the seemingly conventional countenance of a Greek goddess. Its museum name is The Satala AphroditeBut this is not Aphrodite or Artemis, either. Rather it is the Persian goddess Anahita, whose lineage can be traced back to the even more ancient divinity, Ishtar, of Babylon. 

The features of Anahita were reworked with recognizably European features, making her more acceptable to new devotees as her cult moved westward, as so many "mystery" religions did under the Roman Empire. This remarkable work was  discovered in 1873 in modern-day Turkey in the cultural transfer zone (and often battle zone) on the border of the Roman and Persian empires. 
  
However fascinating masks and "guises" are, the unconcealed human face always takes the prize. The many illustrations in The Face convey the incredible range of expressions, intentions and obsessions which are displayed on our face. Try as we might, we cannot wipe away our inner self from registering on our outward countenance.

Ironically, we are never so hard to "read" as when we throw pretense to the winds and just "be" ourselves.

Look at the remarkable portrait drawing of Isabella Brant by her husband, Peter Paul Rubens. Isabella Brant (1591-1626) was no conventional beauty by the standards of her age or ours. Her face in Ruben's sketch, however, is filled with vivacity, charm and self-awareness. What was she thinking about while her husband sketched away?


Peter Paul Rubens, Portrait of Isabella Brant, c. 1621/1622

Perhaps this enigmatic woman was aware of how precious was the moment she and her artist-husband shared together. We will never know what interior dialog was playing out in her mind -and on her face. That is one of the charms of this magnificent rendering of the mystery of human  feeling. 

What we do know about Isabella Brant is that she died four years after this sketch was completed. She was cut-down by bubonic plague, still a fearsome killer three hundred years after the Black Death. We can only hope that Rubens' love for his wife helped her find peace in her tragic final hour.

Human empathy is based on a sense of shared experience and the ties of kinship. We can better relate to other people because we a aware that they strive, struggle, suffer as we do. That is true of relationship of humans with animals. 

Human beings identify with the inhabitants of the Animal Kingdom and have done so since time before time - before the cave art of Chauvet.  



In Bestiary, we see one of the most compelling works in the collection of the British Museum.  A piece of Mammoth tusk has been inscribed with the depiction of two reindeer swimming across a river. It was created about 13,000 years ago and was discovered in France, the source of much of the surviving Ice Age art.

As the caption text surmises, this incredible art work was likely created to record an incident of a hunt, the memory of which could be invoked to help promote a sense of "mastery over the creature through its representation."



Unknown artist, Magdalenian era,The Swimming Reindeer, 11,000 BC

Yet, if you look closely at the features of the reindeer you cannot but feel the artist's appreciation of the life force, the animating "animal" power, of these beasts as they struggle against the current of the river and of the forces of existence. 

After all, the daily experience of Ice Age tribesmen, wandering the bleak earth in search of food, was little different from that of the animals they hunted.

Closer in time and to the spirit of modern society is the golden panel screen painted by Maruyama ÅŒkyo (1733-1795). One of the greatest painters of traditional Japan, ÅŒkyo was well aware of Western techniques and incorporated them into time-honored genres like Kano painting. His Tigers Swimming a River, painted around 1781, reveals a modern sensibility as these fearsome predators show the characteristics of house cats.

ÅŒkyo, unlike the unknown carver of the swimming reindeer, never saw a living tiger. Japanese samurai, however, had hunted tigers during the bloody war in Korea during the 1590's and the big cats continued to fascinate the Japanese long after the war.



             Maruyama ÅŒkyo, Tigers Crossing a River, c. 1781

Tiger skins remained a much sought-after item in Japan. But a preserved tiger pelt has a flattened head and this is how ÅŒkyo painted his swimming felines as they ford the golden river. Given the mystical setting of the tigers' journey, this hardly seems a defect.

As the emotional distance increases between animals in the wild and people living in cities, the greater is the compulsion to project human attributes upon animals. The Victorian artist, Alfred Crowquill (in real life Alfred Henry Forester), was a master of caricature, using animals, "dressed to the nines," to poke fun at people with their lengthy list of social distinctions. 


Alfred Crowquill, A Monkey Dressed as a Man,1844

"Fashion is but One Creature Apeing Another" Crowquill affirmed in this hilarious send-up of the nineteenth century British gentleman. However, animals are different from humans. They do not smoke pipes or play board games. Christopher Matthews, in the text of Bestiary, wisely notes that animals "in the flesh would bite, scratch or simply bolt."

With animals proving so illusive, so impossible to ever fully-understand, humans have created whole categories of hybrid beasts. These weird, wonderful creatures represent the "wild side" of nature, but with a human attribute that we can focus upon in order to tell "our" story in myth and legend. The final chapter of Bestiary brilliantly surveys this  "zoology of the imagination," from  the Sphinx of Egypt to the dragons of China to the Sea-Spirit figure from the Solomon Islands of the South Pacific.



Unknown artist, Solomon Islands, Sea spirit wooden figure, pre-1893

Perhaps the greatest insight of these two wonderful British Museum books relates to the extraordinary explosion of fantasy literature in modern society. The human genome is being decoded and the Hubble Space Telescope is sending back images of Deep Space  - but we keep looking.  As fast as science provides answers, human beings discover new, uncharted realms in themselves and in the world around them.

The more we "know", the more there is to explore. And that is a very good thing.

***
Text: Copyright of Ed Voves, all rights reserved
Images courtesy of the British Museum and Thames & Hudson publishers.


Introductory image:                                                                                                          Cover of The Face: Our Human Story by Debra Mancoff (Thames & Hudson, 2018)

Unknown artist, Marble bust of a sleeping child wearing crepundia (amulets and charms) on a cord across his chest. Possibly placed on child’s tomb.,1st-2nd Century ADPurchased from the estate of Charles Townley, 1805. Marble: 26 cm. (Height)  British Museum Reg. # 1805,0703.110

Unknown artist, Roman Imperial era. Bronze parade mask with a woman’s (Amazon’s) face, c.  2nd century AD. Excavated at Nola, Southern Italy during the 18th century. Bronze: 25.5 cm (height) British Museum Reg. # 1824,0407.10


Unknown artist, Mixtec or Aztec. The Turquoise Mosaics. Mask, possibly of Xiuhtecuhtli, 1400-1521.Found in Mexico. Carved from cedro wood and covered in turquoise mosaic with scattered turquoise cabochons, mother-of-pearl eyes and teeth made of conch shell: 16.8 cm. (height) x 15.2 cm. (width) x 13.5 cm (depth) British Museum Reg. # Am,St.400


Unknown artist, Hellenistic Greek. The Satala Aphrodite, c. 1st century BC. Found in Turkey, 1872. Bronze head from a cult statue of Anahita in the guise of Aphrodite or Artemis: 38.1 cm. (height) British Museum Reg. # 1873,0820.1



Peter Paul Rubens (Flemish,1577-1640), Portrait of Isabella Brant, c. 1621/1622. Drawing with black and red chalk, with brown wash, on paper: 381 mm. (height) x 294 mm. (width) British Museum Reg. # 1893,0731.21

Cover of Bestiary: Animals in Art from the Ice Age to Our Age by Christopher Matthews (Thames & Hudson, 2018)

Unknown artist, Late Magdalenian period, The Swimming Reindeer, 11,000 BC. Excavated at Montastruc, France. Incised on Mammoth ivory: 207 mm. (length) x 30 mm. (height) x 27 mm. (width) British Museum Reg. # Palart. 550


Maruyama ÅŒkyo, Tigers Crossing a River, c. 1781. Painting, six-panel folding screen. Ink, colour and gold-leaf on paper. Signed and sealed. 153.5 cm. (height) x 352.8 cm. (width) British Museum Reg. # 2006,0424,0.1

Alfred Crowquill (Alfred Henry Forrester) (British, 1804-1872) Printed by Samuel Bentley. Satirical print of a Monkey dressed as a Man, 1844. Glyphography: 120 cm. (height) x 105 cm. (width) British Museum Reg. # 1866,0407.146


Unknown artist, Solomon Islands, Pacific Ocean. Found at Makira. Sea spirit wooden figure with fish attributes and with collar of white feathers, pre-1893. Carved wood, with feathers: 72 cm. (height) British Museum Reg. # Oc1904,0621.14