Thursday, August 29, 2024

Art Eyewitness Essay: Thames & Hudson's Museum without Walls

 


Art Eyewitness Essay

Thames & Hudson's Museum without Walls

By Ed Voves

Original Photography & Display Presentation by Anne Lloyd

2024 is a big year for anniversaries in the art world. The National Gallery in London is celebrating two hundred years of showcasing classic works of art to the British public and throngs of foreign tourists. This year, there will be one hundred candles on each of the birthday cakes for the Morgan Library and Museum, the American Wing of the Metropolitan Museum of Art and the Museum of Fine Arts in Houston.

To these sanctuaries of culture and beauty, we at Art Eyewitness send well-deserved accolades and best wishes for the future. At present, though, we will be taking a look at another, slightly younger, venue for creative expression, now celebrating its diamond jubilee.

 Happy 75th anniversary to Thames and Hudson, the "Museum without Walls." 

As i mentioned in the tenth anniversary post of Art Eyewitness, we owe a special debt of gratitude to Thames and Hudson, through its New York office, for its incredible support of our endeavors.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2024)
 A selection of Thames and Hudson art books, past and present 

Thames and Hudson, known as T&H to just about everybody who loves art, was founded seventy-five years ago. In 1949, Walter Neurath and Eva Feuchtang,  joined forces to launch a publishing firm dedicated to integrating text and image in books aimed at scholars and culture-loving readers in the general public. Their plan was publish quality illustrated books and market them at affordable prices to a wide audience.

With a meager start-up fund of £7,000 (much of which was Neurath's life savings) founding T&H was a risky venture. Yet, the new partners, both refugees from Nazi persecution, had a limitless passion for culture. They aimed to publish books which would serve as a "museum without walls."

"Museum without Walls" sounds like a savvy advertising slogan. For Walter and Eva Neurath (they married shortly after T&H's first volumes came off the presses) the high-sounding words were deeply felt, becoming part of the mission statement of T&H.

Attention to practical matters, starting with the name of the firm, was a priority for the T&H founders. "Thames and Hudson" was selected because the new company's orientation was geared to an Anglo-American audience. "Thames" was chosen for the river which flows through London, with "Hudson" representing New York City.

For a company dedicated to coordinating word and image, an eye-catching logo is a must. The Neuraths' selection was a brilliant one, based on the traditions of early publishing, yet appealing to the modern eye.

Two dolphins, "symbolizing friendship and intelligence" swimming in opposite directions, west and east, suggested a "transatlantic connection."


 
The floor mosaic of Thames and Hudson at their corporate headquarters,
 showing the company's trademark dolphin logo

After T&H opened its offices on Bloomsbury Street, London, close to the British Museum, a floor mosaic was commissioned showing the "transatlantic" dolphins (above).

When the T&H dolphins first swam into view, Great Britain was still coping with post-war "austerity" measures. The first T&H book lists in the early 1950's stressed British-culture. With much of Britain, especially London, still in ruins from bomb damage, books like English Cathedrals (1951) were a good choice - and a major success. English Cathedrals remained in print for two decades.

The Neuraths had global ambitions, however. They aimed to reveal the world of art in all its glory and publishing books in  series format was their chosen technique.



An early and long-lasting T&H series dealt with ancient history and the latest findings from excavations the world over. A number of the volumes in "Ancient Peoples and Places" were written by the archaeologists who had led the "digs." Carl Blegen (1887-1971, the great American archaeologist whose discoveries at Homeric sites in Greece and Turkey have yet to be surpassed, authored the T&H book on Troy.

With the success of "Ancient Peoples and Places", Thames and Hudson never looked back. Today the number and variety of T&H book series is astonishing. All emphasize the seamless integration of word and image. 

It would be fruitless to try and encompass the extent and achievement of the many book series of Thames and Hudson. Instead, I will focus on one to do justice to the many: "World of Art."



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2024)
 A selection of "World of Art" books with cover art from the 1980's=90's

Thames and Hudson launched "World of Art" in 1958. For modestly priced books, the number of illustrations was remarkable, with a selection of color pictures in most (but not all) of the volumes. To keep costs down, the series was "co-produced" with Praeger Publishers handling the American editions during the early years of publication. But everything about these wonderful books was pure T&H.

As with "Ancient Peoples and Places", scholars with authoritative knowledge of their subject, like John Boardman, were commissioned by T&H. Several of these writers, as I was to discover, were major figures in the dramatic events of modern art. But the volumes they wrote were anything but "I remember when" memoirs.



Ed Voves, Photo (2019)
 Gallery View of the Museum of Modern Art, June 2019,
 showing Joan Miro's Birth of the World, 1925

One of the first "World of Art" books which I can remember buying was a second-hand copy of Miro by Roland Penrose. Thanks to visits to MOMA, I had finally overcome my resistance to modern art but was still mystified by Miro. I had no idea of who Roland Penrose was nor of his stature in the British art establishment. After reading Miro, the same was true. "World of Art" books deal with art, not the cult of personality.



An early edition cover of Camilla Gray's The Russian Experiment in Art

Thames and Hudson's policy was to hire  well-known "experts" to write "World of Art" volumes. They made an exception for Camilla Gray. 

The story of how Camilla Gray. an unknown, "amateur" historian, came to write The Russian Experiment in Art, 1863-1922, is indeed "exceptional". So is Thames and Hudson's decision to publish it. Yet, the "back story" of The Russian Experiment in Art is indicative of the humanity and global vision of Thames & Hudson and of its "World of Art" series.

Camilla Gray was born in 1936. Her father, a curator at the British Museum, did not believe in college education for young women, so she studied ballet. During the 1950's, Gray had an opportunity to visit the Soviet Union to study dance. She became fascinated with Russian art during the era of the Bolshevik Revolution.

 Not only was there a shortage of books in the West examining the achievements of Natalia Goncharova, Kasimir Malevich and other leading artists of that pivotal moment in modernism - there were NO books on the subject. So Camilla Gray decided to write one herself.



Camilla Gray, author of The Russian Experiment in Art
 with her husband, Oleg Prokofiev 

Without a university education or many contacts in the academic world, Camilla Gray set to work. She mastered the Russian language and searched libraries and museums for examples of Russian art and documents from the years bracketing 1917. Short of funds, Gray worked temp jobs, including a term as a library assistant at the New York Public Library while she researched the archives at MOMA. In 1960, she was able to return to Russia for a short time, interviewing some of the surviving members of the Revolutionary-era avant garde.

Gradually, Gray's narrative account of Russia's "great experiment" took shape. With important help from Alfred H. Barr, Kenneth Clark and others, Gray completed her manuscript in 1962, which T&H published as a large-format hardback.

Thames and Hudson was taking a chance on Gray's book, not only because she was an unknown writer. The Cold War was at its absolute nadir in 1962 with the Berlin Wall stand-off and the Cuban Missile Crisis threatening nuclear war. Few people in the West, especially in the U.S., could be expected to buy a book on Bolshevik-era artists. 

The Great Experiment: Russian Art, 1863-1922, as the book was initially called, was an immediate success. It was (and remains) compelling to read and authoritative in its assessment of the bold Russian artistic initiatives before Stalin's clampdown on culture in the 1920's. Gray's book was translated into a number of languages. Russian was not one of them. Soviet authorities were enraged at the book's honesty and candor.

Tragically, Camilla Gray did not live long to savor her triumph. Soviet authorities thwarted her attempts to marry the Russian poet and artist, Oleg Prokofiev, son of the famous composer. When, finally, Gray was able to travel to Russia and marry Prokofiev, she contracted hepatitis and died in December 1971.



 The cover of The Russian Experiment in Art, 1863-1922, 1986 edition

Thames and Hudson, to its great credit, endeavored to keep Camilla Gray "alive" by maintaining her book in print. The Russian Experiment in Art was reissued as a "World of Art" title and in 1986 was expanded with notes and an introduction by a prominent scholar, Marian Burleigh-Motley. Other histories of early 20th century Russian art, benefiting from access to archival material denied to Gray, have since been published. But Gray's classic work endures, secure in its long-term place in the ranks of "World of Art" titles.

By the time that the expanded version of The Russian Experiment in Art appeared, T&H's "World of Art" was undergoing a major transformation. The entire series was now appearing in glossy-covered paperbacks with more color illustrations and new introductory chapters to keep the text abreast of scholarship and recent discoveries in archaeology. The cover art of these 1980's-90's "World of Art" editions often had a bold, cinematic tone which I thought was consistently superb. Never was this more true than with History of Film, published in 1995.



On should not judge a book by its cover. But I am going to go "out on a limb" and state that the cover of T&H's History of Film is the most visually engaging of any book cover design that I have ever seen. And David Parkinson's masterfully succinct text, surveying the evolution of film, is a perfect match to this image.

A bit of an exaggeration? 

Consider that creating motion pictures, In terms of an artistic genre and as an entertainment industry, is a two-fold endeavor. Shadows flash on a wall at 24 frames per second, somehow, mysteriously, telling us a story. 



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2024)
       The cover (and detail) of History of Film in the "World of Art" series                     

In fact there is no "somehow" in film making. Cinematography is an exacting, technological process, as we can see in this sensational photo of an RKO film crew at work. Yet, the "mystery" of cinema remains and will always do so. 

That is what we see on this T&H cover and why I find it so compelling.

One generation's defining style in painting or sculpture quickly becomes "old hat" or "Victorian" to the next. So with graphic design. 

Around the turn of the millennium, T&H shifted to a new format for "World of Art." Sharply-cropped images, displayed in a rectangular setting, appeared on the covers of new titles like Five Centuries of British Painting by Andrew Wilton, the curator of the J.M.W. Turner collection at the Tate Gallery in London.



For a person who grew-up watching wide-screen sagas by such directors as David Lean and Stanley Kubrick, the 1980's-90's book covers imparted an epic tone to "World of Art" titles. For younger art lovers, attuned to the small screen of television and the smaller computer screen, the "Y2K" covers were a perfect fit.

The wheel of time is ever-turning. 

With the approach of the company's seventy-fifth anniversary, Thames and Hudson commissioned the Dutch design firm, Kummer & Herman, to help them create a new visual identity for "World of Art".  The cover designs were to reflect the legacy of the Neurath's guiding principles back in 1949. Strikingly modern in appearance, "World of Art" covers would reflect the series' openness to a changing world, as well as the deep roots of human creativity.


The Kummer & Herman designers achieved this complex goal by basing the new cover lay-outs on a grid, "inspired by the the Golden Ratio; the system of mathematical proportion believed for millennia to be the secret of aesthetic harmony in nature, art, and design."



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2024)
  "World of Art" books for sale at the Philadelphia Museum of Art shop

The Golden Ratio grid format would enable "World of Art" designers to "create endless variations, while at the same time unifying all individual books within the continuing series."

Since, 1958, three hundred "World of Art" titles have been published. Despite Thames and Hudson's loyalty and commitment to the authors of its books, many of these vintage "World of Art" titles have gone out of print. One of the most recent to do so is a long-term classic in the series, A Concise History of Modern Painting, written by Sir Herbert Read.

Originally published in 1959, A Concise History of Modern Painting was a brilliant book which helped to establish the reputation of the entire series. Revised, enlarged and updated over the years, Read's book was a favorite with readers and the T&H editorial board. Finally, the decision had to be made, retiring this classic "World of Art" title and commissioning a new account which would evaluate the global spread of modern art since Read died in 1968.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2024)
 Herbert Read's A Concise History of Modern Painting, published in 1959, with its "replacement", Simon Morley's Modern Painting, 2024

The latest addition to "World of Art" is an exceptional a book, as worthy in its way as Read's time-honored volume. Simon Morley dates the birth of Modernism to the 1820's, decades before Cezanne. He widens the coverage of recent years to include artists like Julie Mehretu and Albert Oehlen, whose work addresses the dissonances of modern life, of which there are certainly many!

I had thought to finish this tribute to Thames and Hudson with a comparative look at these two appraisals of modern art, Read's and Morley's. On further reflection, to do justice to both, I have chosen to leave that task to a future post. 

To comprehend the achievements of Thames and Hudson is more than a matter of analyzing and critiquing this or that book. Of course, T&H is in the business of selling books. But this company, still owned and managed by the Neurath family, really is dedicated to the concept of creating a "museum without walls."


Ed Voves, Photo (2019)
 Gallery View of the Museum of Modern Art, June 2019,
 showing Claude Monet's Water Lilies, 1914-26

During the spring of 2020 and for months thereafter, the Covid-19 pandemic shut the doors of museums - the "brick and marble" ones. We could not visit Monet's water lilies at MOMA as these folks did in June 2019. The "invisible museum" of Thames and Hudson, however, remained open. 

The role of T&H books, as subjects for reviews and source material for essays, was crucial for keeping Art Eyewitness a going concern during the challenging months of 2020. A selection of T&H books reviewed in Art Eyewitness during 2020, appears below.





2020 T&H books reviewed In Art Eyewitness: El Greco by Fernando Marias, Street Art Africa by Cale Waddacor, John Nash by Andy Friend

Art is an organic process, the most human of activities. It is a matter of externalizing what is inside of ourselves  - ideas, insights, convictions, perceptions, memories and visions. For seventy-five years, T&H has been publishing books overflowing with all of the above, drawn from the experience of artists and authors, creative masters and people like us.



In the seven and a half decades since the founding of,Thames and Hudson, T&H books have become an essential resource for art making and art appreciation - and civilized living. That is certainly the case here at Art Eyewitness.

To all at Thames and Hudson, congratulations for seventy-five wonderful years! And thanks in advance for the years ahead!

***

Text and original photos: Copyright of Ed Voves, all rights reserved         

 Original photography, Copyright of Anne Lloyd

Images courtesy of Thames and Hudson: Thames and Hudson book covers and photo of the dolphin floor mosaic from Thames and Hudson headquarters.

 The concluding image of Thames and Hudson logos, one from the 1950's, the other from recent years, comes from zuma.creative.com/thameshudson.html

The photo of Camilla Gray and Oleg Prokofiev comes from the archives of the Tretyakov Gallery, Moscow

Wednesday, August 7, 2024

Art Eyewitness Essay: Lydia Cassatt, Model and Muse

 

Art Eyewitness Essay

Lydia Cassatt: Model and Muse

By Ed Voves

Original Photography by Anne Lloyd

It is a mark of a great exhibition when our expectations have been met (or exceeded), some of our preconceptions have been confounded and our vision of art and awareness of life have been expanded.

Mary Cassatt at Work, on view at the Philadelphia Museum of Art until September 8, 2024, succeeds on all three counts. 

In the case of expanding vision and awareness, the Cassatt exhibition focused my reflections on Cassatt's life in a way which was a considerable departure from the theme of the exhibition. I certainly had not begun to think along such a different, if not divergent, train of thought when I first visited the exhibition galleries back in May.

 


Anne Lloyd, Photo (2024)
  Entrance to the Mary Cassatt at Work exhibition

Mary Cassatt at Work is an ambitious endeavor, brilliantly analyzing the career goals, technical skills and working methodologies of Cassatt as a mature artist. Yet, at some point during several visits to the exhibition, Mary Cassatt's sister, Lydia, emerged as a major protagonist in the course of Cassatt's rise to greatness.

I had expected Lydia Cassatt to make her presence felt in the exhibition. She was the model for one of the premiere paintings in the collection of the Philadelphia Museum of Art (PMA) dating to the late 1870's. Now entitled Woman in a Loge, this painting, set in one of the exclusive, mirror-backed compartments at the Paris Opera, used to be called LydIa in a Loge.


   Anne Lloyd, Photo (2024)
  Mary Cassatt's Woman in a Loge,1879

A brilliant and complex work, Woman in a Loge was Cassatt's breakout painting at the 1879 Impressionist salon, the first in which she participated. Normally, Woman in a Loge is displayed in the main gallery devoted to Impressionism at the Philadelphia Museum of Art. Other works by Cassatt are hung in the museum's American art wing, an issue which we will consider later in this essay. 

In the setting of the Impressionist gallery, Woman in a Loge, reigns like a queen on her throne.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2023)
View of Gallery 252 at the Philadelphia Museum of Art, showing
 the usual placement of Mary Cassatt's Woman in a Loge  

 As can be seen in the photo above, Woman in a Loge, is normally displayed in an ornate, golden frame. But that is not how the curators of Mary Cassatt at Work present the painting. Instead, we see it in an austere frame, painted in a light olive hue. Surprisingly, since the the late 1870's were the height of the "gilded age," this modest frame was the type and color which Cassatt chose for the painting back in 1879.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2024)
   Mary Cassatt's Woman in a Loge, displayed as it was in 1879

it was difficult to adjust to Woman in a Loge in her new/old frame. The modern-looking lines and olive green color of the frame were not the only issue. The walls of the opening galleries of Mary Cassatt at Work are painted a very dark shade of gray. The overhead lights are kept low, with Cassatt's paintings and prints illuminated from strategically-placed lighting fixtures.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2024)
  Gallery view of the Mary Cassatt at Work exhibition

The effect is very dramatic and, initially, disorienting. i was not the only person at the press preview to comment on this unexpected treatment of one of the "star" paintings of the PMA's collection. But it was not long before considerations about the frame and lighting seemed beside the point. It was the woman in Woman in a Loge who mattered.

Lydia Cassatt was the elder sister of Mary. She was born in 1837, the year that Queen Victoria's reign began. While Mary, nicknamed "Mame", boldly launched her career in the arts, Lydia remained at home. Unmarried and untrained for any vocation outside of the family circle, Lydia seemed fated for the women's role much praised in a popular poem of the time, "the angel in the house."

In 1874, Mary made the audacious decision to settle and work in France - without financial support from her family. In a quiet act of rebellion, Lydia decided to follow in her younger sister's footsteps. In what was most likely posed as the role of chaperone, Lydia joined Mary in Paris in 1875.

The Cassatt sister's independence lasted two years. Lydia's health became a concern and their parents decided to join them.



Edgar Degas, 
Mary Cassatt at the Louvre: the Etruscan Gallery, 1879–80

Before her health declined, Lydia joined Mary in sampling the cultural delights of France. Edgar Degas recorded the sisters' visit to the Louvre.

When not sightseeing in Paris, Lydia managed their modest household, while Mary painted. Lydia also posed for "Mame" whose oeuvre remained oriented to portraits and genre studies rather than landscapes. Models cost money and the Cassatt sisters had precious little to spend with Mary's professional reputation yet to be made.

If, as seems very likely, Lydia posed for Woman in a Loge, the fidelity of the facial features of the beautiful and vivacious young woman in the painting to those of Lydia in real life needs to be addressed.

It's not an easy matter to resolve, as no portrait photos of Lydia have apparently survived.



In 1878-79, when Mary was working on Woman in a Loge, Lydia was aged 41. She was no longer a young woman by Victorian standards. Moreover, Lydia had recently been diagnosed as suffering from a serious kidney disorder known as Bright's Disease. 

Is Lydia the Woman in a Loge? If so - and I believe it is her -then Woman in a Loge is an idealized portrait. It is also an "in-denial" portrait of a seriously-ill woman.

Another, very different, portrait of Lydia, dating to 1880, reveals a shocking physical decline from Woman in a Loge. 



Mary Cassatt, Autumn, 1880

Entitled Autumn, this powerful and poignant work is in the collection of the Musee de Petit Palais, Paris. Given the personal/family relevance of Autumn, it is surprising that Mary Cassatt selected Autumn to feature among her contributions to the 1881 Impressionist salon. Yet, she did.

Autumn is not on view in Mary Cassatt at Work. But the exhibition does display numerous works depicting Lydia between 1878 and the year of her death, 1882. From these, it is clear that Mary Cassatt was grappling with a subject seldom addressed by the Impressionists in their paintings - human mortality.




Anne Lloyd, Photo (2024)
  
Gallery view of Mary Cassatt at Work, showing paintings
 of Lydia Cassatt, dating to 1878-1880

These paintings of Lydia had an unsettling effect on me. Were these merely depictions of an upper class woman keeping busy with needle work and embroidery? My wife, Anne, picked-up the tenor of these paintings.

"It looks like Mary Cassatt was painting her sister's passing," Anne said, and she is undoubtedly correct.

In terms of chronology, the series of depictions of Lydia begins with a small work from a private collection, Lydia Seated in the Garden with a Dog on her Lap. Painted with a bold Impressionist verve that rivals Monet, it dates to around the same time as Cassatt was working on Woman in a Loge. It is hard to conceive of two pictures of the same person being so different.



Mary Cassatt, Lydia Seated in the Garden with a Dog on Her Lap, 1878–79

The colorful and historic setting of this painting was Marly-le-Roi, the site of a grand chateau of Louis XIV destroyed during the French Revolution. Despite the verdant background and the engaging dog on Lydia's lap, there is an ominous note to this work. Significantly, Lydia is portrayed from the back. In coming upon her from behind, we are not being shut-off from this paradise-like locale, but rather excluded from her thoughts.

In the paintings which enable us to study Lydia's face, it is once again apparent that Mary Cassatt was well aware of what was happening to her sister, physically and emotionally.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2024)
  Mary Cassatt's
Lydia at a Tapestry Frame, 1880-81


Anne Lloyd, Photo (2024)
  Mary Cassatt's Lydia Crocheting in the Garden at Marley, 1880

If you look closely at Lydia's face in these paintings, there is battle of emotions taking place in her countenance.  A deep note of sadness, as her life force drains way, is countered  by a stoic courage to keep-up the appearances of normalcy, to keep working no matter how mundane or trivial the task may seem.  Lydia is dying and, yet, bravely struggling to live.




Another of Mary Cassatt's paintings of Lydia is on view in the exhibition. It is a very familiar and much loved work from the PMA's collection. Driving (sometimes referred to as A Woman and a Child Driving) dates to 1881. It shows a healthy, confident Lydia holding the reigns of a carriage. Edgar Degas' young niece is beside her and a groom sitting behind, ready to manage the horse and carriage when they have reached their destination.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2024)
  Mary Cassatt's Driving, 1881

This is customarily viewed as a "Youth and Experience" painting. As its regular placement is in the American art galleries at the PMA, a contrast with Woman in a Loge is not the easiest. Driving is presented in a different gallery in the exhibition, but it was still fresh in my mind when I gazed at Lydia Crocheting in the Garden at Marly (1880).




Lydia Crocheting looks ill. A year later, Lydia in A Woman and Child Driving appears to have recovered her health. Sadly, this painting, like Woman in a Loge, is an idealized portrait.

Lydia Cassatt died on November 7, 1882, at the age of 45. Her passing was an excruciating ordeal, described by her father as "many years of ill-health and 84 days of deathbed agony." 

Mary Cassatt was devastated by Lydia's death. She was unable to resume painting and printmaking for several months after losing her sister.

Lydia's illness and death may be interpreted in a number of ways. Death is the common lot of all humankind. Yet, Lydia's "deathbed agony" was a true example of the religious concept of redemptive suffering.

During the course of my research for this essay, I chanced upon a superb scholarly article entitled "Mary Cassatt's portraits of her sister, Lydia: Tracing signifers of disease and impending death."

The 2022 article, written by Lini Radhakrishnan of Rutgers University, closely studies Cassatt's paintings of Lydia. This article is available by open access on the Internet at the following link. It is a "must-read" for anyone interested in Mary Cassatt's life and art.

Radhakrishnan's analysis brilliantly details the close correspondence of Cassatt's depiction of the facial features, skin tone and other physical attributes of Lydia's tormented body with the actual "signifers" or manifestations of kidney disease.

Rather than try and paraphrase the clinical analysis of all the paintings Radhakrishnan surveys, I will quote a brief passage from the treatment devoted to Lydia at a Tapestry Frame.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2024)
  Detail of Mary Cassatt's
 Lydia at a Tapestry Frame, 1880-81

Radhakrishnan writes:

As the title indicates Lydia is depicted at a tapestry frame, but this time the hands at work are neither gloved nor elegant. The left hand seen under the frame has become misshapen and the bluish gray tinge seen on the contorted digits denote poor oxygenation, a distinct sign of diminishing kidney function. There is a similar discoloration on her facial skin and signs of edema or swelling around the eyes and under the chin. Edema was a condition linked to Bright’s disease and referred to the puffiness caused by excess fluid trapped in the body’s tissues.

Lydia's travail, physical and emotional, was not in vain. Earlier I described Lydia as an exemplar of redemptive suffering. For many, the idea that one person''s acceptance of pain or privation may benefit others is a difficult concept to grasp. Yet, Lydia Cassatt's suffering would have a transforming effect on her sister's outlook on life and art

Many Cassatt scholars view Lydia's death as a major turning point in Mary's artistic career. Before Lydia became ill, there were no indications that Mary would become a "painter of mothers and infants."  Cassatt did not display one of her signature "mother and infant"" paintings until the 1881 Impressionist exhibition. As noted earlier, the 1881 show was the venue for Autumn, a meditation on Lydia's imminent death.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2024)
  Mary Cassatt's Mother and Child (Maternal Kiss), 1896

The Mary Cassatt whose art we know and love dates from the shocking loss of her sister. Inspired by Lydia's courage in the face of death, Mary chose life.as the theme of her art. As Radhakrishnan writes, Mary's paintings of the ailing, suffering Lydia were "foundational of the next chapter of her work."

Though she never married or had children of her own, Mary Cassatt created a special universe in her art where infants are nurtured by the strong and tender love of their mothers. 



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2024)
  Gallery view of Mary Cassatt at Work, 
with display of Cassatt's Baby Joan Nursing, 1908

Many children are not so blessed - or not to the same degree - as a "Mary Cassatt mother and child." 

How wonderful it is, then, to behold such a pair in real life, walking down the street, in the playground or gazing at a Mary Cassatt painting in the local museum of art.

***

Text: Copyright of Ed Voves, all rights reserved. Photos by Anne Lloyd, all rights reserved                                                                                          

 Introductory Image:

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2024) Gallery view of Mary Cassatt at Work showing Cassatt’s Lydia at a Tapestry Frame, 1880-81.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2024) View of the entrance to the Mary Cassatt at Work exhibition, Philadelphia Museum of Art.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2024) Mary Cassatt’s Woman in a Loge, 1879.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2024) View of Gallery 252 at the Philadelphia Museum of Art, showing the usual placement of Mary Cassatt’s Woman in a Loge.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2024) Mary Cassatt’s Woman in a Loge as it was displayed in 1879.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2024) Gallery view of the Mary Cassatt at Work exhibition.

Edgar Degas, (French, 18-1917) Mary Cassatt at the Louvre: the Etruscan Gallery, 1870-1880.

Mary Stevenson Cassatt (American, 1844-1926) Autumn, 1880. Oil on Canvas: 93 x 65 cm. Musee du Petit Palais, Paris.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2024) Gallery view of Mary Cassatt at Work, showing paintings of Lydia Cassatt, dating to 1878-1880.

Mary Stevenson Cassatt (American, 1844-1926) Lydia Seated in the Garden with a Dog on Her Lap, 1878–79. Oil on canvas, 10 3/4 × 16 in. (27.3 × 40.6 cm). Cathy Lasry, New York.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2024) Mary Cassatt’s Lydia at a Tapestry Frame, 1880-81. Oil on Canvas: 65.5 x 92 cm. Flint Institute of Arts, Michigan.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2024) Mary Cassatt’s Lydia Crocheting in the Garden at Marly, 1880. Oil on canvas: 25 13/16 x 36 7/16 in. (65.6 x 92.6 cm) Metropolitan Museum of Art. #65-124

Mary Stevenson Cassatt (American, 1844-1926) Driving, 1881. Oil on canvas, 35 5/16 × 51 3/8 in. (89.7 × 130.5 cm). Philadelphia Museum of Art, W1921-1-1

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2024) Detail of Mary Cassatt’s Lydia at a Tapestry Frame, 1880-81.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2024) Detail of Mary Cassatt’s Mother and Child (Maternal Kiss), 1896.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2024) Gallery view of Mary Cassatt at Work, showing Cassatt’s Baby Joan Nursing, 1908.