Showing posts with label Pierre-Auguste Renoir. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Pierre-Auguste Renoir. Show all posts

Saturday, September 6, 2025

Art Eyewitness Essay: "Mirror of the Soul", Reflections on the Paris to Provence exhibit at the Barnes Foundation

 

"Mirror of the Soul"
     Reflections on the Barnes Foundation's Paris to Provence Exhibition


Text by Ed Voves
Original Photography by Anne Lloyd

In a December 1885 letter to his brother, Theo, Vincent van Gogh composed one of his most poignant statements on his aims as an artist:

"I'd rather paint people's eyes than cathedrals," Van Gogh stated, "for there's something in the eyes that isn't in the cathedral ... to my mind the soul of a person ... is more interesting."

While reading this heartfelt statement, one almost senses that the Dutch painter will continue his reflections with a paraphrase of the often-quoted proverb, "the eyes are the mirror of the soul."

Van Gogh did not pursue the eyes/soul theme or use the analogy of mirror in his 1885 letter to Theo. Earlier, in 1877, he did write in this vein to his brother - as we will discuss momentarily. But when I stood before Van Gogh's portrait of Joseph-Etienne Roulin, on view in a special exhibition at the Barnes Foundation in Philadelphia, these words soon came to mind and have been much in my thoughts since then.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025)
 Vincent van Gogh's The Postman (Joseph-Etienne Roulin),1889

Van Gogh's "Postman" was the anchor work of art in a spectacular four-painting ensemble in the just concluded From Paris to Provence exhibition at the Barnes Foundation in Philadelphia. In the Art Eyewitness review of this wonderful exhibit, I commented on the special insights afforded to this portrait by a change from its normal Barnes Method presentation. I won't belabor that point further.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025)
Gallery view of Paris to Provence, showing
 Van Gogh's Still Life (1888), The Smoker (1888), The Postman (1889) 
and Houses and Figure (1890).

Oddly enough, it was not the way that Joseph-Etienne Roulin was hung in the exhibition that occasioned my reflections on the eyes of this iconic portrait. Instead, it was a very unusual design feature in the layout of Paris to Provence in the Roberts Gallery of the Barnes which led to a train of thought which, to be honest, I had not been expecting.  



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025) 
Gallery view of Paris to Provence at the Barnes Foundation, showing
 an example of a "cut-out" or "window" exhibition feature

Known colloquially as "cut-outs" or "windows", these openings in gallery walls create lines of sight which can totally transform exhibit spaces. The Met used this technique to brilliant effect in its 2022 Winslow Homer exhibition.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022)
 Gallery view of the Winslow Homer: Crosscurrents exhibit at The Met

Instead of keeping us "imprisoned" within four walls and a ceiling, the special exhibition gallery now opens our eyes and minds to unusual sights, unorthodox angles of observation and unexpected impressions and thoughts. This process sounds more dramatic than it is in practice, which transpires at several degrees below our conscious awareness.

Yet, these "cut-outs" can powerfully affect our perception and help transform a visual encounter with works of art into a visionary experience.

For that to happen, we need to augment the influence of sophisticated design techniques like "cut-outs" with an appreciation of the work of art we are examining. This includes the social and spiritual realms which the artist and his subject inhabit, as well as the exterior setting around them.  

To help us comprehend this complex interplay of outer environment and inner character traits, another quote from Vincent van Gogh is in order. This reflection dates to 1877, when Van Gogh worked in an art dealership in London. In a letter to his brother, Theo, Van Gogh wrote,

 "The souls of places seem to enter the souls of men, so often from a barren, dreary region there emerges a lively, ardent and profound faith. As the place, so the man. The soul is a mirror first, and only then a seat of feeling."   

To test Van Gogh's theories on how the circumstances of the world around us enter into the "souls of men", let's compare the Barnes Foundation's portrait of Joseph-Etienne Roulin with two others which the Dutch artist painted of the French postal official (of a total of six).    

Shortly after arriving in Arles during the winter of 1888, Van Gogh became acquainted with Joseph-Etienne Roulin (1841-1903) and established a close friendship. Early on, he painted an impressive, almost heroic-scale, portrait of Roulin in his dark blue postal uniform, which gave him the air of a rugged sea-captain. 



Vincent van Gogh, Postman Joseph Roulin, 1888

This portrait, one of the treasures of the Museum of Fine Arts Boston, presents  Roulin in an introspective mood. His eyes are not focused on Van Gogh, but looking inward. That is certainly not the case with a tightly-cropped portrait of Roulin, painted around the same time. It has the hard, almost defensive, stare of a passport photo.

It is this second work, from the collection of the Detroit Institute of Art, which best serves as a foil to the Barnes portrait of Roulin, which was painted in the spring of 1889. The two works, studied in contrast, exemplify Van Gogh's 1877 reflections on how the "soul is a mirror first, and only then a seat of feeling." 
  


Van Gogh's Portrait of the Postman Joseph Roulin, 1888,
 from the Detroit Institute of Art, (left) contrasted with the Barnes Foundation's The Postman (Joseph-Etienne Roulin), 1889

We know from Van Gogh's letters to Theo that it took him a while to get the measure of Roulin. Initially, he matter-of-factly described Roulin as a "man more interesting than most." 

By the time he painted Roulin in the spring of 1889. Van Gogh's tone had completely changed. Roulin had devotedly aided him during the terrible emotional breakdown triggered by the dispute with Gauguin. Even after he was transferred to duty in Marseilles, Roulin returned to Arles to visit Van Gogh, as he struggled to regain control of his life. Now, Roulin is described as having "the salient gravity and a tenderness for me such as an old soldier might have for a younger one." 
  



Gravity and tenderness, along with concern, sorrow and perhaps, a touch of fear. These emotions are visibly present in the "mirror" of Roulin's eyes. An intelligent man, with considerable life experience, Roulin likely suspected that Van Gogh's recovery would be a difficult process. 

There can be absolutely no doubt that the experience of his friendship with Roulin  had registered in Van Gogh's soul as "a seat of feeling." Van Gogh signed the Barnes Foundation portrait, "Vincent." It was the only one of his six portraits of Roulin to be signed. 

Van Gogh captured the essence of Roulin's character and inner spirit, making this work one of the greatest portraits in European art during the "long" 19th century. Having acknowledged Van Gogh's achievement, it also needs to be emphasized that From Paris to Provence gave plenty of scope to his contemporaries as portrait painters. Renoir, Cezanne, Gauguin and later Modigliani and Soutine, each in their unique way, devoted themselves to depicting their subjects - body and soul. 


    

The opening gallery of Paris to Provence presented a choice selection of portraits by Renoir, a portrait by Cézanne of his wife (which, like many a Cézanne, seems more of a work-in-progress than a finished painting) and an intriguing genre scene by Manet. All are works of enduring merit. 



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025)
 Gallery view of the Paris to Provence exhibition, showing Renoir's Portrait of 
Jeanne Durand-Ruel, 1876

Given our theme of the eyes as "mirror of the soul,"  Renoir's portraits of two young girls, each the daughter of a prominent art dealer, command our attention.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025)
 Details of Renoir's Portrait of Jeanne Durand-Ruel, 1876, &
Girl with a Jump Rope: Portrait of Delphine Legrand, 1876

The girl on the left, Jeanne Durand-Ruel (1870-1914), was the daughter of Paul Durand-Ruel, the principal dealer of Manet and the Impressionists, including Renoir. On the right is Delphine Legrand, whose father, Alphonse Legrand, helped organize the Second Impressionist Exposition. This occurred in 1876, the year Renoir painted both portraits.

Renoir is said to have left the choice of clothing to the subjects who sat for their portraits. In the case of these children, the selection would have been made by their parents. The decision to dress the six-year old Jeanne in a bare-shouldered ball dress seems out-of-character for a level-headed business man and staunch Catholic like Durand-Ruel. Whatever motivated the choice of this dress, the result was to make little Jeanne look "living-doll" cute but also vulnerable, rather than grown-up and beautiful.

The blue smock, worn by Delphine, was a more sensible choice. Even grasping a jump-rope, she projects a mature personna. Looking at Delphine Legrand, one senses that this little girl is quite capable of handling herself in her social milieu.




Close-study of the faces and eyes of Jeanne and Delphine confirm what marvelous portraits these are. Renoir succeeded in capturing the real character of each girl and evoking their individual souls as "a seat of feeling." Jeanne's eyes are compelling and appealing; Delphine's are alert, aware and self-assured.

Or so it seems - and this is an important point to consider.

If we continue to hearken-back to the proverb, "the eyes are the mirror of the soul," we need to reflect on what this means. Proverbs, like the Oracle of Delphi, are open to interpretation. 

Who is reflected in the mirror of Jeanne's and Delphine's eyes? The young girls themselves? Renoir, who painted them? We, the art lovers who study them?



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025)
 Cézanne's Madam Cézanne, 1888-1890, Barnes Foundation

Continuing in this train of thought, who is mirrored in the dull, dark eyes of Madam Cézanne? Displayed in the same gallery as the Renoir portraits just described, Cézanne's painting appears to come from a completely different artistic convention and an alien way of thinking.

Cézanne could paint endearing and character-affirming portraits - when he was moved to do so. He demonstrated his versatility with Madam Cezanne with Her Hair Down, from the collection of the Philadelphia Museum of Art. This was created shortly after the Barnes Foundation portrait with its grim, sullen expression, dating to 1890. 


                                                                                                                      
Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025) 
Cézanne's Madam Cézanne with Her Hair Down, 1890
 Philadelphia Museum of Art collection

Cézanne's rationale for depicting the human countenance according to the dictates of mood and feeling is memorably described  by his biographer, Alex Danchev:

Cézanne portrait is more a thereness than a likeness. The mature Cézanne scorned mere likeness ... The portraits he preferred were the ones that showed temperament...

Inscrutable though the Barnes' portrait of Madame Cézanne may appear, we should resist concluding that personal factors or traces of marital discord influenced the way her husband depicted her. Cézanne had other motives. He was pushing art into uncharted regions, toward discovering a "thereness." 

Sentimentality had little place in Cézanne's artistic calculations. He adored his son, Paul. Yet the numerous portraits and sketches of Paul displayed in the National Gallery exhibit, Cézanne's Portraits (2018), and MOMA's Cézanne Drawing (2021) feature a circumscribed range of emotions much like those in  paintings of his mother. No beaming eyes or charming smiles that I can recall.

Instead of sentimentality in his portraits, Cézanne responded to sensations.

"I paint as I see, as I feel," Cézanne declared early in his career, "and I have very strong sensations."

It was these sensations and Cézanne's rigorous determination to depict them on his canvas which drew the attention of the succeeding generation of artists to follow his example, if not his techniques.

In the final gallery of From Paris to Provence, the legacy of Renoir, Van Gogh and - especially - Cézanne was seized-upon and radically re-envisioned by the School of Paris artists. 


Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025)
 View of the final gallery of From Paris to Provence, showing (from left) Modigliani's Girl with a Polka-Dot Blouse (1919), Soutine's Woman in Blue (1919) & Modigliani's Portrait of the Red-Headed Woman (1918)

Of this avant-garde group, Modigliani and Soutine worked with an almost reckless disregard for convention and their own health. They sought to integrate new influences into the art of portraiture - African masks, unsettling theories about human thought, emotion and sexuality, the impact of World War I - to promote the grand traditions of French art for a new century.

To  a remarkable degree, the School of Paris painters, with hardly a Frenchman in their ranks, made a lasting impact on the world of art.                                            



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025)
Details of portraits by Amadeo Modigliani and Chaim SoutineModigliani's Portrait of the Red-Headed Woman (1918)Girl with a Polka-Dot Blouse (1919); Soutine's Woman in Blue (1919)

By the time this essay is posted, all of the works of art displayed in From Paris to Provence will have been rehung in their accustomed places on the gallery walls of the Barnes. Most had not been moved from their prescribed configuration since the 1993 international exhibition of Barnes Foundation works of art.  

Van Gogh's "Postman" will return to its cramped position behind an 18th century Windsor chair and Delphine Legrand will hop and skip with her jumping rope over a painted wooden chest, made by Pennsylvania Dutch craftsmen in 1792.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025)
 Visitors to the Barnes Foundation, viewing works of art in the Main Room, north wall, of the museum

However, don't expect the situation at the Barnes to be exactly as it was before From Paris to Provence. This is especially true, if you had the good fortune to visit this superb exhibition. 

Once you look in the mirror of a person's eyes and catch a glimpse of their soul - or a reflection of your own - things are never quite the same again.

***

Text: Copyright of Ed Voves, all rights reserved                                  

Original photography, copyright of Anne Lloyd

All works of art, unless otherwise noted are from the Barnes Foundation collection


Introductory Image:
Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025) Detail of Pierre-August Renoir's Portrait of Jeanne Durand-Ruel, 1876.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025) Vincent van Gogh's The Postman (Joseph-Etienne Roulin), 1889. Oil on canvas: 25 7/8 x 21 3/4 in. (65.7 x 55.2 cm).

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025) Gallery view of Paris to Provence at the Barnes Foundation, showing four paintings by Vincent van Gogh: Still Life (1888), The Smoker (1888), The Postman (1889) and Houses and Figure (1890).

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025) Gallery view of Paris to Provence at the Barnes Foundation, showing an example of a "cut-out" or "window" exhibition feature.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Gallery view of the Winslow Homer: Crosscurrents exhibition at the Metropolitan Museum of Art

Vincent van Gogh (Dutch, 1853-1890) Postman Joseph Roulin, 1888. Oil on canvas: 32 x 25 3/4 in. (81.3 x 65.4 cm). Museum of Fine Arts Boston. 

Vincent van Gogh (Dutch, 1853-1890) Portrait of the Postman Joseph Roulin, 1888. Oil on canvas: 25 9/16 x 19 7/8 in. (65 x 50.5cm). Detroit Institute of Art. 

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025) Gallery view of the Paris to Provence exhibition, showing exhibition  entrance and Pierre-Auguste Renoir's Woman with a Fan.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025) Gallery view of the Paris to Provence exhibition, showing Pierre-Auguste Renoir's Portrait of Jeanne Durand-Ruel, 1876.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025) Details of Renoir's Portrait of Jeanne Durand-Ruel, 1876. 44 7/8 x 29 1/8 in. (114 x 74 cm)  and Girl with a Jump Rope: Portrait of Delphine Legrand, 1876. Oil on canvas: 42 1/4 x 27 15/16 in. (107.3 x 71 cm) 

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025) Cézanne's Madam Cézanne, 1888-1890. Oil on canvas: 36 1/2 × 28 3/4 in. (92.7 × 73 cm) 

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025) Cézanne's Madam Cézanne with Her Hair Down, 1890. the collection of the Philadelphia Museum of Art. Oil on canvas: 24 3/8 × 20 1/8 in. (61.9 × 51.1 cm) 

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025) Installation view of the final gallery of From Paris to Provence, showing (from left) Modigliani's Girl with a Polka-Dot Blouse (1919), Soutine's Woman in Blue (1919) and Modigliani's Portrait of the Red-Headed Woman (1918).

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025) Detail of portraits by Amadeo Modigliani and Chaim SoutineModigliani's Portrait of the Red-Headed Woman (1918). Oil on canvas: overall: 45 11/16 x 28 3/4 in. (116 x 73 cm); Modigliani's Girl with a Polka-Dot Blouse (1919). Oil on canvas: 45 1/2 x 28 3/4 in. (c 115.6 x 73 cm); Soutine's Woman in Blue (1919). Oil on canvas: 39 1/2 x 23 3/4 in. (100.3 x 60.3 cm)

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2025) Visitors to the Barnes Foundation, viewing works of art in the Main Room, north wall, of the museum.

Wednesday, July 10, 2024

Art Eyewitness Review : Matisse and Renoir at the Barnes Foundation

 

     Matisse & Renoir: New Encounters at the Barnes

Barnes Foundation, Philadelphia

June 23 – September 8, 2024

Reviewed by Ed Voves                                                                   

Original photography by Anne Lloyd

The old saying, “Two’s company, three’s a crowd,” needs to be reinterpreted in light of the summer 2024 exhibition at the Barnes Foundation, Matisse & Renoir: New Encounters at the Barnes.

The “two’s company” part of the proverb is easy enough to grasp. Two grand masters of French painting, Henri Matisse (1869–1954) and Pierre Auguste Renoir (1842-1919) cultivated a warm friendship during the last years of Renoir’s life. In part, this exhibition considers their shared love of art during years marked by global war and Renoir’s excruciating physical suffering caused by rheumatoid arthritis.

Who is the third, possibly intruding, member of the relationship?

Dr. Albert C. Barnes.

The impact, influence and insights of Dr. Barnes are everywhere to be perceived in this moderately sized, superbly-presented exhibition.

Firstly, Barnes collected the works of both artists in “depth.” The Barnes collection features 181 Renoirs and 59 paintings by Matisse. The quality of these works needs to be underscored as well. One can say that six (at least) of the greatest paintings by Matisse were purchased by Barnes and are now on display at the museum. Several of these, including Le bonheur de vivre, also called The Joy of Life (1905-06), are featured in the exhibition. 


                                           
Anne Lloyd, Photo (2024)
 Henri Matisse’s Le Bonheur de vivre, (The Joy of Life),1905-1906 

 With Renoir, Barnes obviously purchased his works with personal passion, rather than strictly critical appraisal. Barnes admitted as much. There are many masterpieces by Renoir, however, among the astonishing array amassed by Dr. Barnes.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2024) 
Pierre-Auguste Renoir’s Leaving the Conservatory, 1876–1877

As noted by the exhibition curators, Barnes favored Renoir’s later works rather than those painted during the early years of Impressionism.Two of the most significant works by Renoir in the exhibit, however, date from the 1870s. Renoir's late works, celebrating the female nude, would fall into disfavor, as did similar paintings by Matisse,especially from the 1920's. Barnes seldom heeded the critical opinions of others and kept buying works by both artists.

It is, thus, almost impossible to consider Renoir and Matisse without some acknowledgement of the role of Dr. Barnes as collector. However, there is another aspect of this artistic “three-some” that is more problematical. The “Barnes Method” of presenting art does not always work to the advantage of individual paintings or sculptures when appreciated on their own merits.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) 
Gallery view of the Barnes Foundation. Matisse's Two Young Girls in a Red and Yellow Interior,1947, appears above a 1700's Slant-top Desk

Dr. Barnes’ technique emphasized group or “ensemble” displays, a juxtaposing of celebrated oil paintings with smaller works on paper, folk art, ancient artifacts, hand-crafted furniture and utensils from daily life.

A good example of this approach is the ensemble anchored by Renoir’s Mussel-Fishers at Berneval (1879). It is one of the key works by Renoir on view in Matisse & Renoir: New Encounters.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2024) 
Pierre-Auguste Renoir’s Mussel-Fishers at Berneval, 1879

As it usually appears on the second floor of the Barnes Foundation, Renoir’s impressive depiction of children from a coastal fishing village in Normandy is hung above an 18th century Pennsylvania German wooden chest. Displayed on the chest are pewter vessels and redware ceramic objects from the 1800’s. In close proximity are 16th century iron andirons. 



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2024) 
Gallery view of the Barnes Foundation, showing the usual ensemble display of Renoir's Mussel-Fishers at Berneval, 1879

This visual orchestration certainly creates an atmosphere of rustic charm surrounding Mussel-Fishers at Berneval, though I am not sure if that was Dr. Barnes' intention. Whatever the organizational planning for this ensemble, I never cease to be impressed by it when visiting the Barnes.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2024) 
Gallery view of Matisse & Renoir: New Encounters at the Barnes,
 showing (from left) Renoir’s Prominade, 1905, Mussel-Fishers at Berneval, and Leaving the Conservatory, 1876–1877

Renoir’s Mussel-Fishers at Berneval is presented in a very different manner in the current exhibition. It is mounted between the 1905 portrait of Renoir's young son, Claude, and his nurse, Prominade, and Renoir's Leaving the Conservatory from 1876-77. In keeping with modern-day museum standards, it is a graceful and spacious arrangement. But it certainly is not in “sync” with the Barnes method.

Why did the curators of Matisse & Renoir: New Encounters depart from the Barnes method? A very prosaic reason, rather than an abrupt change in institutional policy, provides the answer.

The Barnes Foundation opened its center-city Philadelphia location on May 12, 2012. Over a decade of heavy-foot traffic necessitated refinishing work on the upper-level floors of the building. 



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) 
           Gallery view of the Barnes Foundation, showing Matisse’s       Three Sisters (Les Trois soeurs) in their usual display configuration

Rather than put all of the beloved works of art in storage, a brilliant alternative was found: mount a special exhibition of the second-floor paintings by Renoir and Matisse, a display which would recall their friendship during the final years of the “war to end all wars.”

In 1917, Matisse traveled to the south of France for a respite from the stresses of the war. He had been rejected from military service because of his age and health, but members of his family were trapped behind German lines and one his sons was serving in the French army, the second soon to follow.

The initial meeting on December 31, 1917, at Renoir’s home at Les Collettes, was strained. Renoir nursed some lingering resentment for Matisse, leader of the Fauves. Matisse and his “wild beast” colleagues had undermined the Impressionist aesthetic of “on-the-spot” depiction of the transitory state of nature. 

"Impressionism is the newspaper of the soul," Matisse had declared, a remark which left a lot of room for interpretation.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2024) 
Detail of a 1917 photo of Henri Matisse & Pierre Renoir

Matisse and Renoir quickly warmed to each other. Thereafter, Matisse visited often, especially as Renoir, wracked with pain, neared death in 1919. How could an artist of great soul like Matisse resist the withered little man of unquenchable spirit who proclaimed, “The pain passes, Matisse, but the beauty remains.”

Matisse could not resist and neither will you, if you are fortunate to visit the Barnes for this unusual presentation of masterworks by Renoir and Matisse.

The curators of this wonderful exhibition, Cindy Kang and Corinne Chung, did resist a contemporary trend in gallery display. This is the “in-dialog” methodology of hanging two (seemingly) similar paintings by different artists, side-by-side. The rival paintings can then “duke-it-out”, at least in the minds of inquisitive patrons.

Instead, the Barnes curators chose a chronological approach, with alternating galleries devoted to works by Renoir and then to Matisse. This enables us to trace the development of both artists up to their tense introduction on New Years Eve 1917. Crucially for Matisse, this presentation model informs our appreciation of the continuing evolution of his art after Renoir's death.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2024) 
Cindy Kang discussing works by Renoir at the press preview for 
Matisse & Renoir: New Encounters at the Barnes


Anne Lloyd, Photo (2024) 
Gallery view of Matisse & Renoir: New Encounters at the Barnes, showing Matisse’s Three Sisters (Les Trois soeurs) series,1917

 There certainly are "pros" as well as "cons" for the in-dialog display technique. It is interesting to speculate on whether that might have worked in the case of Matisse & Renoir: New Encounters at the Barnes.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2023) 
Gallery view of Manet/Degas at the Metropolitan Museum of Art

The Met’s 2023 Manet/Degas utilized the in--dialog approach and it succeeded brilliantly. Of course, Manet and Degas were rivals – “frenemies” – and direct comparison of their works was appropriate. The same was true for MOMA's exhibit back in 2005 devoted to the painting sojourns of Cezanne and Pissarro in Pontoise during the 1870's. Painting with Pissarro as his companion and mentor helped liberate Cezanne's art. 

The irony of Matisse & Renoir: New Encounters at the Barnes is that the relationship of the two painters was a true dialog about art. Matisse and Renoir covered a wide expanse of topics in their conversations. Renoir still had a sharp mind, an earthy sense of humor and, with two sons recovering from war wounds, a bitter attitude about the futile "meat-grinder" tactics of the Great War.

"Renoir," Matisse recalled, "said it should be the old and infirm sent to die in holes, not the young with their lives before them."

The best place to consider the "dialog" between Matisse and Renoir - in conjunction with the Barnes exhibit - is Hilary Spurling's biography, Matisse the Master, published in 2005. Two short excerpts from this wonderful book will suffice to set the tone of the encounters between these masters of art:

He (Matisse) came regularly in the early evening to sit with the old man, who was gripped as the light faded by dread of the night's suffering ahead. They swapped gossip, told frisky stories, compared notes about their beginnings (Renoir said he spent the proceeds from his first picture sales on a sack of haricot beans to feed his children.) ... They discussed technique, reputation, posterity, the whole question of shifting focus and vision that had been the main battlefield for their two generations.

One of the prime subjects of conversation was Renoir's work-in-progress, Composition, Five Bathers. This Arcadian scene of nudes in the Rubins' tradition was Renoir's response to the horrors of death and suffering which had engulfed the world in 1914 - and to his own private, physical suffering.

Matisse thought highly of Renoir's Composition - Five Bathers. So did Dr. Barnes, who purchased the now controversial painting.It can be seen in a nearby gallery in the Barnes regular, first floor, exhibition area.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2024) 
Pierre-Auguste Renoir’s Bather Gazing at Herself in the Water, 1910

Dr. Barnes bought quite a number of Renoir's late nudes, like Bather Gazing at Herself in the Water, from 1910, on view in the exhibition. The esteem of Barnes and Matisse for these robustly-figured nudes is shared by few today. A similar cloud of disapproval likewise shrouds the nudes and scantily-clad odalisques which absorbed much of Matisse's time and energy during the 1920's.

Whatever one's reaction to a work like Moorish Woman (The Raised Knee), Matisse's career path had been largely decided by one of his signature works in the Barnes Collection, created at the height of the Fauvist revolution.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2024)
 Henri Matisse’s Red Madras Headdress, 1907

Matisse”s Red Madras Headdress (Le Madras rouge) was painted between the end of April and mid-July 1907. An earlier, more sketch-like version was created shortly before. This portrait of Matisse’s wife, Amélie, is one of his greatest works, setting a standard of achievement which Matisse was to struggle to match for many years thereafter.

Red Madras Headdress is a work of great psychological insight, almost a signature portrait of European identity at the start of the twentieth century. Clad in an exotic head scarf, Matisse’s protagonist (Amélie) radiates independence, candor, skepticism and more than a touch of coy sensuality.



Temporarily liberated from its crowded “Barnes Method” location, Red Madras Headdress asserts itself as one of the great works of Matisse. This is the face of the young, self-confident twentieth century, painted by the "King of the Fauves."

The uncluttered placement of Red Madras Headress allows us to raise a further issue. Why did Matisse not follow-up this striking portrait with more of the same caliber? In fact, Matisse would never again paint such a portrait, with this level of bold, direct articulation of the modern spirit.


Anne Lloyd, Photo (2024) 
Gallery view of Matisse & Renoir: New Encounters at the Barnes, showing Matisse’s Red Madras Headdress

In the years after he painted Red Madras Headdress, Matisse began to explore different, less radical paths for creating art. The social implications of Modernism were becoming obvious – and not all were reassuring to him. Though interested in Cubism, Matisse did not embrace the new movement nor any of the other "isms" which followed. 

In 1908, Matisse wrote an essay whose most famous statement would be used by art critics and avant garde artists to denounce and heap scorn upon him.

“What I dream of is an art of balance, of purity and serenity, devoid of troubling or depressing subject matter, a soothing, calming influence on the mind, rather like a good armchair which provided relaxation from physical fatigue.”.

Matisse may well have regretted the "armchair" example (it is sometimes omitted from the quote). For Matisse, the years just prior and, especially, during World War I were marked by a search for "an art of balance, of purity and serenity."

This search brought Matisse to the door of Renoir's home on New Year'a Eve, 1917. There he found an arthritic old man with a paint brush tied to bandaged fingers, painting his vision of Arcadia. 

Years later, during the aftermath of World War II, Matisse would follow Renoir's lead and paint a series called the Vence Interiors.




Anne Lloyd, Photo (2024)
 Henri Matisse’s Two Young Girls in a Coral Interior, Blue Garden, 1947 

 Elderly, careworn, still suffering from a near-death encounter with cancer in 1941, Matisse  could not even stand for long periods in front of an easel. Yet, he finally achieved his aim of creating images of "balance, of purity and serenity."

Across the Atlantic Ocean, Dr. Albert Barnes took note and purchased two of the Vence Interiors. These were to be the last works by Matisse to enter the Barnes Collection.  These small, meditative paintings are the perfect works of art to conclude Matisse & Renoir: New Encounters at the Barnes.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2024)
 Gallery view of Matisse & Renoir: New Encounters at the Barnes,  
 showing two of Matisse's Vence Interiors

Perfect works too, to illustrate Matisse's indomitable creative spirit and how he came to embody, how he came to live Renoir's immortal words, “The pain passes, Matisse, but the beauty remains.”

 ***

Text: Copyright of Ed Voves, all rights reserved                                                                                          

Original photography, copyright of Anne Lloyd

Introductory and first image:  Anne Lloyd, Photo (2024) Henri Matisse’s Le Bonheur de vivre, also called The Joy of Life, between October 1905-1906. Oil on canvas Overall: 69 1/2 x 94 3/4 in. (176.5 x 240.7 cm) The Barnes Foundation

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2024) Pierre-Auguste Renoir’s Leaving the Conservatory (La Sortie du conservatoire), 1876–1877 Oil on canvas: 73 13/16 x 46 1/4 in. (187.5 x 117.5 cm) The Barnes Foundation, Philadelphia.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2024) Gallery view of Matisse's Two Young Girls in a Red and Yellow Interior, 1947, appears above a 1700's Slant-top Desk.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2024) Pierre-Auguste Renoir’s Mussel-Fishers at Berneval (Pêcheuses de moules à Berneval, côte normand) 1879. Oil on canvas: 69 3/8 x 51 1/4 in. (176.2 x 130.2 cm) The Barnes Foundation

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2024) Gallery view of the Barnes Foundation, showing the usual ensemble display of Renoir’s Mussel-Fishers at Berneval, 1979.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2024) Gallery view of Matisse & Renoir: New Encounters at the Barnesshowing (from left) Renoir’s Prominade, 1905, Mussel-Fishers at Berneval.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2024) Gallery view of Matisse & Renoir: New Encounters at the Barnesshowing (from left) Renoir’s Prominade, 1905, Mussel-Fishers at Berneval, and Leaving the Conservatory, 1876–1877

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2024) Detail of a 1917 photo of Henri Matisse and Pierre-Auguste Renoir.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2024) Dr. Cindy Kang of the Barnes Foundation, discussing works of art by Renoir at the press preview of Matisse & Renoir: New Encounters at the Barnes.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2024) Gallery view of Matisse & Renoir: New Encounters at the Barnes, showing Henri Matisse’s Three Sisters (Les Trois soeurs) series, painted between April to mid-July 1917. The Barnes Foundation, Philadelphia.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2023) Gallery view of the Manet/Degas exhibition at the Metropolitan Museum of Art.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2024)  Pierre-Auguste Renoir’s Bather Gazing at Herself in the Water, 1910. Oil on canvas: 25 13/16 x 32 in. (65.5 x 81.3 cm) 

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2024) Henri Matisse’s Red Madras Headdress (Le Madras rouge), painted between the end of April and mid-July 1907. Oil on canvas: 39 3/8 x 31 7/8 in. (100 x 81 cm) The Barnes Foundation, Philadelphia.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2024) Gallery view of Matisse & Renoir: New Encounters at the Barnesshowing Matisse's Red Madras Headdress.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2024) Henri Matisse’s Two Young Girls in a Coral Interior, Blue Garden (Deux fillettes, fond corail, jardin bleu), Between May-June 1947 Oil on canvas Overall: 25 1/2 x 19 5/8 in. (64.8 x 49.8 cm) The Barnes Foundation

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2024) Gallery view of Matisse & Renoir: New Encounters at the Barnesshowing two of Matisse's Vence Interiors.