Showing posts with label Catholic Church. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Catholic Church. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 31, 2022

Art Eyewitness Essay: A Late Summer's Day Visit to the Philadelphia Museum of Art

 

A Late Summer's Day Visit to the Philadelphia Museum of Art 

An Art Eyewitness Essay

Photos by Anne Lloyd
Text by Ed Voves

April 2, 2022 was a noteworthy day in the art world. It was Slow Art Day.

This special day, usually celebrated on the second Saturday of April, is dedicated to adjusting the pace at which we race through art galleries. Slow down. Take time to appreciate and enjoy the works of art which museum curators work so diligently to present to us. What's the rush?

I missed Slow Art Day this year, I'm embarrassed to report. I can't recall what I was doing on April 2, but I made-up for it a few days later.

On April 7, I took part in a press preview of a wonderful retrospective of paintings and prints by Sean Scully at the Philadelphia Museum of Art. Mr. Scully graciously analyzed key works and answered questions with great good humor. It was truly enlightening to spend an unhurried hour or so with him - and his works of art.



Ed Voves, Photo (2022)
Sean Scully & Timothy Rub, President/CEO of the Phila. Museum of Art

Taking a note from that wonderful experience, I decided to extend the close attention to the general collection of the Philadelphia Museum of Art (PMA) which normally I reserve for special exhibitions.  

My wife, Anne, and I live in Philadelphia. With so many exhibits to cover for Art Eyewitness, there is always the temptation to wait and study local treasures at a later date. We are just a bus ride away from the PMA. We can always come back, in a week, in a month ...

If the Covid-19 lockdowns have taught art lovers one thing, it is to never take museums and galleries for granted. 



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2021)
View of the Philadelphia Museum of Art

The late summer seemed a good time for a leisurely, if focused, tour of the Philly Museum. There being a lull between the Sean Scully retrospective and the big Matisse exhibition planned for October, our attention would be undivided. 



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) 
Augustus Saint-Gaudens, Diana, 1885-86

Our plan was to head for the third floor of the museum, via the  imposing staircase graced by Augustus Saint-Gaudens' statue of the goddess, Diana. This gilded lady once served as the weathervane atop the original Madison Square Garden in New York City. 

Dangling overhead is Ghost, a mobile made by Alexander Calder in 1964 for an exhibition at the Guggenheim Museum.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) 
Alexander Calder, Ghost, 1964

Before we began our climb, we decided to check-in with two "friends" on the main floor of the museum, Madame Cézanne and Mary Cassatt.

There are different strategies of how to explore a museum. Anne and I often begin by paying our "respects" to the three portraits of Madame Cézanne at the PMA and to the works by Mary Cassatt at the museum.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022)
                    Gallery view of the Philadelphia Museum of Art,                      showing portraits by Paul Cézanne of his wife

Madame Cézanne is in a notably dour mood in these three portraits by her husband. In the center one, however, Madame Cézanne has such a compelling look in her eyes that she seems about to favor us with a nod, if not a smile.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) 
Paul Cézanne's Portrait of Madame Cézanne, 1885-86

There is a really important point here, one that slowing down and making repeated visits to a favorite painting makes easier to grasp. 

Great works of art possess a sense of possibility, a charge of potential energy. Madame Cézanne will never change, never smile. But these great portraits invite our close study and emotional engagement. This in turn triggers our thoughts and awareness. And we change, maybe even smile, too.

In the case of Mary Cassatt, I especially cherish her magnificent 1879 painting, Woman with a Pearl Necklace in a Loge. But, for quite awhile, I failed to give it the attention it deserved. I thought that the elegant young woman (the model is thought to have been Cassatt's sister, Lydia) is turning in her seat to greet companions as they enter the loge.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) 
Mary Cassatt's Woman with a Pearl Necklace in a Loge, 1879

Not so. Look again and we see the back of the young woman's head reflected in a mirror. Reflected too, are other opera fans, in loges or opera boxes on the other side of the theater. Why on earth would a mirror have been placed in the confined space of an opera box?  Was this an artistic device of Cassatt's?

After a bit of research, I found that the Teatro di San Carlo in Naples, Europe's oldest opera house, has mirrors in its loges. Each is set at an incline to offer a glimpse of what is occurring in the Royal Box. I would assume that loges at the Paris Opera were similarly equipped in Cassatt's day. Yet, the inclusion of a mirror in Cassatt's painting has more to do, I suspect, with the subject of optics than with celebrity snooping.

In Woman in a Loge, Cassatt depicted her protagonist as if we could look directly at her, as she sits in the loge. But the reflections of the audience in the opera boxes across the way show how she would appear to them. The beaming young woman is a singular person, a special "someone" with grace and charm. Yet, seen from the opposite side of the theater, she is a face in the crowd. 

That may be a sobering thought, but a few moment's of meditation before a great painting or sculpture can help us assess our place in the universe. Each of us is a unique individual, one soul among many, many millions of souls.



To apply the same level of attention to all the  works on view in a museum, that we have accorded to Woman with a Pearl Necklace in a Loge, is clearly impossible. So how to proceed, having paid our respects to Madame Cezanne and Miss Cassatt?

"Festina lente," as the Roman emperor, Augustus, said. Make haste, slowly.

Several art museum studies have shown that many visitors follow the first part of Augustus' advice. In 2001, the Metropolitan Museum of Art conducted a survey which found that the average time spent looking at a work of art was 27.2 seconds. Fifteen years later, the Art Institute of Chicago repeated the experiment. The findings were similar: 28.6 seconds. 



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022)
 Gallery view of the Phila. Museum of Art, with works by Claude Monet

As Anne and I walked up the steps past the gleaming statue of Diana, we clearly had to do better, that is observe art at a slower and more patient pace. 

Luckily, the Philadelphia Museum of Art put some serious thought into how to  present its collection. When it opened in 1927, the museum's first director, Fiske Kimball, worked on a master plan to transform the third floor into a chronological succession of galleries and period rooms. 

Fiske Kimball's initiative was eventually crowned with success. Today, we can visit the splendid galleries which he and his team installed. These include the Reception Hall from a Ming Dynasty palace, early 1600's, and the Pillared Hall from a South Indian temple to Vishnu, dating to the 1500's. The sculptures and fixtures comprising this incredible gallery were acquired by an intrepid Philadelphia lady, Adeline Pepper Gibson, during a trip to India in the early 1900's and bequeathed to the PMA.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022)
 Gallery view of the Philadelphia Museum of Art, showing 
the Pillared Hall from a South Indian temple, 1500's 

Fiske Kimball was notably successful with evoking the religious faith of Christendom during the Middle Ages. Since I discussed the medieval galleries of the PMA in a recent review, Anne and I decided to devote most of our late summer day's visit to the European galleries and period rooms of later centuries.

This historical era, the early modern age, is the time when the "Old Master" painters flourished. Thanks to collectors like John G. Johnson, the PMA certainly has its share of Old Master works of art. One of my favorites is Rembrandt's Head of Christ. Rembrandt used a model from Amsterdam's Jewish population to evoke the face of Jesus, thus promoting greater religious sensitivity.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022)
 Rembrandt's Head of Christ, 1648-56

In our tour of these early modern galleries, Anne and I were especially interested in the work of "anonymous." Despite the fame of Rembrandt, Rubens and other titans of brush and oils, unknown artisans active in the folk tradition of their respective countries created inspirational works of art.



   Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022)
            Gallery view of the Philadelphia Museum of Art, showing               Latin American colonial-era art, 1600-1700's

The settings of the early galleries in this wing of the PMA deal with Italy and Spain during the 1500's and 1600's. These are unexpectedly austere from the standpoint of material culture, though well provided with religious art.



  Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022)
            Gallery 353 of the Philadelphia Museum of Art, showing              Spanish doors, furniture and paintings, 1500-1600's.

This period was the High Renaissance and the Golden Age of Spain. Yet the living standards of the great mass of citizens in Italy and Spain were blighted by endless wars, galloping inflation and dreadful outbreaks of the plague. The obsessive - to us - emphasis on art dealing with the sufferings of Jesus and the saints was embraced by the people of that era rather than imposed upon them.

And yet, there were displays of humor in those hard times and a sense of mischief which could border on irreverence. Comic elements are surely to be seen in some of the carvings on a pair of walnut doors made in Spain, 1550-1600, and on a stone fireplace created in Italy around the same time.




Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022)
 Top: Pair of Doors from Spain, with carvings of the Annunciation and Saints Peter and Paul, 1550-1660; Italian Chimneypiece, 1550-1660

The identity of the maker of these handsome Spanish doors is a mystery. It is likely that the doors come from Castile, in central Spain, but beyond that, little is known about them. All of the decorative motifs are inspired by the Roman Catholic form of Christianity espoused by the Spanish monarchy of Philip II. Close inspection of the carving, however, reveals a sense of mirth which could have been explained away to all but the most suspicious officials of the Inquisition.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022)
 Details from Pair of Doors from Spain, with carvings of the Annunciation and Saints Peter and Paul, 1550-1660

At the top of the doors, we see an officious-looking Angel Gabriel barging into the room of the Virgin Mary who is poised to flee. The look of alarm on the faces of cherubs above and other details, such as St. Peter with his enormous set of keys, belong to the European folk art tradition which left many traces of wit and humor on the decoration of churches and cathedrals.

In the case of the Italian chimney piece, it is not difficult to grasp how the shadows cast by its carved faces can generate a sense of fantasy and drama. 




Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022)
 Details from an Italian Chimneypiece, 1550-1660

The Chimneypiece obviously had a great deal of use. Standing before it today, we can visualize how the dancing, darting flames would have projected the flickering faces of jesters and mythical characters around the room on a winter's night.

More carvings in the European folk tradition appear further on in the 1500-1850 galleries. Three of these works feature in a story of incredible coincidence or of the intervention by divine providence, depending on your point-of-view. 

Three sculptures, choir screen, altarpiece and statue of the Virgin Mary and Jesus, form an ensemble from the Chapel of the Chateau of Pagny, the Renaissance-era estate of the Admiral of France, Philippe Chabot de Brion, located in Burgundy.

The Chateau Pagny's Choir Screen, made from marble and alabaster, 1536-38, was acquired by the PMA in 1930. It was - and remains - one of the most significant works of art in the Museum's collection.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022)  
Choir Screen from Chapel at the Château of Pagny, 1533

The Choir Screen extended across the nave of the chapel, purposely shielding the altar and the sacred ritual of the Christian Mass from the gaze of the congregation. This arcane practice is hard for even faithful Christians to grasp today, given the emphasis on openness and participation. Yet, during 1500's-1600's, the concept of the altar as a sanctuary or "holy of holies" was of central importance to Roman Catholics.

The spectacular gilded, carved Altarpiece, now placed behind the Pagny Choir Screen  was purchased fifteen years later. And that is where the story gets really interesting..



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022)
 Detail of Altarpiece with Scenes of the Passion, c. 1535

Fiske Kimball and his team of PMA curators purchased the altarpiece in 1945. They did so on the likelihood that it was similar to the one in the Pagny Chapel, of which all trace had been lost. Incredibly, after diligent research into the provenance of this magnificent work, they discovered that it was the actual altarpiece which had been sited behind the Choir Screen of the Chapel of Pagny, just as we see it today. 

I don't know what is the mathematical probability of reuniting the long-separated Choir Screen and Altarpiece, but the author of the Handbook to the PMA's collection is absolutely correct to use the word "miraculously" to describe the whole transaction.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022)  
Virgin and Child beneath a Canopy, from the Château of Pagny, 1533

The third of the artworks from the chapel of the Chateau of Pagny is a tall, slender sculpture, Virgin and Child beneath a Canopy. Measuring 14 feet 5 1/4 inches in height, it presented a considerable challenge for Anne to get a photo. Luckily, many of the most interesting details of this work - certainly from the European folk art tradition - were down at the bottom, almost at eye level.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022)  
Detail from Virgin and Child beneath a Canopy, 1533

There we see several carved heads and two small figures.The heads look-out from little niches, their faces a mix of agitation or incredulity. Who are they?  Souls in Purgatory awaiting redemption? Or perhaps, could they be self-portraits of the stone carvers who made the statue? For now, it is mystery. But considering how much we now know about these splendid sculptures, it is not impossible that one day we will learn their identity.

As we proceed with our tour through the European period rooms and galleries, 1500-1850, we see fewer and fewer religious paintings and a diminishing number of quirky, rough-hewn works by artisans of the old school. Occasionally, craft genius asserted itself with demonstrations of individualism and skill. But unforgettable works in the folk art tradition such as a wrought iron flagstaff holder from Italy, made in the 1500's, were increasingly pushed to the margins by the "fine" arts.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022)
Flagstaff Holder in the Form of a Dragon, Italy, 1500's

In the place of the culture of Christendom and folk tradition, what we observe is the growth of secular society in the West.

The relegation of religion to the realm of the private conscience brought many benefits, but it spawned problems, too. A growing spiritual malaise among the aristocrats and gentry in Great Britain was noted as the eighteenth century progressed. Shockingly, not a few clergyman in England grew lax in their spiritual duties, as well.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022)
Vicar and Moses, 1782-1795

The decline in religious faith among England's "upper crust" was satirized by this lead-glazed earthenware piece, entitled Vicar and Moses. It is actually a very significant work of art, a very early product from an Industrial Revolution factory in Staffordshire.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022)  
Period rooms at the Philadelphia Museum of Art.
               Top, the Grand Salon from the Chateau de Draveil, 1735;                below, the Drawing Room of Lansdowne House, 1766-1773  

The reconstruction of period rooms such as the Grand Salon from the Chateau de Draveil or the Drawing Room of Lansdowne House brought the polished elegance of 18th century France and England to the galleries of the Philadelphia Museum of Art. To transfer the fixtures, mirrors, woodwork, furnishings, etc., and reassemble them  in the Philadelphia Museum of Art was indeed a mighty accomplishment, worthy of the Age of Enlightenment.

In 1938, as Fiske Kimball worked on his master plan, four magnificent statues from the eighteenth century were donated to the PMA. They had come onto the art market in 1922, with little information about their provenance. Each statue depicted one of the seasons of the year in the guise of a Roman god or goddess, Autumn as Bacchus, for instance.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) 
View of Gallery 366, showing two of the Four Seasons statues,1770-1790. From left, Winter as Saturn and Autumn as Bacchus

At the time of their arrival at the museum, the Four Seasons were attributed to the  sculptor, Augustin Pajou (1730–1809), one the masters of that era. This claim is disputed today, but the fact that Pajou was credited shows how superbly carved they are.. 

Today, the statues stand, slightly over-life sized, in Gallery 366. This, for the most part, is a fine placement for viewing them, but the gallery also functions as busy corridor. I can't imagine the times I've walked through on my way to another gallery, without paying attention to these Enlightenment -era masterpieces.

On the day of our "Slow Art" tour of the 1500-1850 galleries, Anne and I did stop to look at the Four Seasons. Or rather, we were stopped in our tracks by the sheer excellence of these statues.

Each of the Four Seasons is an allegorical figure but exudes real human feeling. Look at Saturn, huddled in his robe and you cannot help but believe that he feels the cold of Winter coming on.



 Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) 
Detail of Winter as Saturn from the Four Seasons

Each of the Four Seasons inhabits a natural setting, made believable by incredible attention to detail, the chipped and scaling bark on the stump by the foot of Bacchus, the stalks of grain, billowing in the wind at the leg of Ceres.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) 
Detail from Autumn as Bacchus from the Four Seasons

If you stand awhile in Gallery 366, you will see the shadows cast by the statues on the walls, looming large, looking like the souls of the statues and of the seasons they represent.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) 
Gallery view showing Autumn as Bacchus from the Four Seasons

Each of the Four Seasons is an individual being, a real person rather than a type. 



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022)
 Detail of Spring as Flora from the Four Seasons

When I looked up and studied the countenance of Flora, I recognized the same liveliness which  Cassatt's Woman in a Loge exudes. The same compassion that can be glimpsed in the eyes of Rembrandt's Christ, was there in Flora's eyes.

These Four Seasons are incomparable works, regardless of who carved them. They live in a universe of stone, ready for our summons to spring to life.

But that call to action will have to wait. Our world was summoning us. It was time for us to leave. 

Plenty of great art to enjoy on our next tour of the Philadelphia Museum of Art! Plenty to think about and appreciate from this visit.

It's amazing what you see when you slow down - and look. 

***

Text: Copyright of Ed Voves, all rights reserved    

Images copyright of Anne Lloyd, all rights reserved

All photographed works of art are from the collection of the Philadelphia Museum of Art.

Introductory Image: Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Gallery view of the Philadelphia Museum of Art.

Ed Voves, Photo (2022) Sean Scully & Timothy Rub, President/CEO of the Philadelpha Museum of Art.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2021) Exterior view of the Philadelphia Museum of Art.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Augustus Saint-Gaudens, Diana, 1892-94.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Alexander Calder, Ghost, 1964.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Gallery view of the Philadelphia Museum of Art,          showing portraits by Paul Cézanne of his wife

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Portrait of Madame Cézanne by Paul Cézanne, 1885-1886. Oil on canvas: 24 3/8 × 20 1/8 inches. The Henry P. McIlhenny Collection in memory of Frances P. McIlhenny, 1986.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Mary Cassatt's Woman with a Pearl Necklace in a Loge, 1879. Oil on canvas: 32 × 23 1/2 inches (81.3 × 59.7 cm) Bequest of Charlotte Dorrance Wright, 1978.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Gallery view of the Philadelphia Museum of Art, with works by Claude Monet.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022)  Gallery view of the Philadelphia Museum of Art, showing the Pillared Hall from a South Indian temple, 1500's.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Rembrandt's Head of Christ, 1648-1656. Oil on oak panel, laid into larger oak panel: 14 1/8 × 12 5/16 inches. John G. Johnson Collection, 1917.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022)  Gallery view of the Philadelphia Museum of Art, showing Latin American colonial-era art, 1600-1700's. In the foreground is a silver gilt monstrance created by Franciso de Soria Hurtado (Peru, active 1651-92).

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Gallery 353 of the Philadelphia Museum of Art, showing Spanish doors, furniture and paintings, 1500-1600's.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Pair of Doors from Spain, with carvings of the Annunciation and Saints Peter and Paul, 1550-1600. Walnut; iron mounts: Dimensions: Including posts: 7 feet 6 3/4 inches × 55 1/2 inches × 4 3/4 inches. Gift of The Rosenbach Company, 1944 

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Italian Chimneypiece, 1550-1600 Stone: 7 feet 2 5/8 inches × 9 feet 6 3/16. Gift of Mr. & Mrs. W. Lawrence Saunders II, 1928

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Choir Screen from Chapel at the Château of Pagny, 1533

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Detail of Altarpiece with Scenes of the Passion,from the Chapel at the Château of Pagny  :c. 1535. Artist unknown, perhaps from the workshop of Master of the Oplinter Altarpiece, (Flemish) Gilded and painted wood sculptures; tempera-painted panels: Height: 9 feet 8 inches (294.6 cm)  Width (Wings closed): 7 feet 6 inches (228.6 cm). Purchased with Museum funds from the George Grey Barnard Collection, 1945

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022)  Virgin and Child beneath a Canopy from the Château of Pagny, 1533. Stone:Height:14 feet 5 1/4 inches. Purchased with funds contributed by Mrs. Charles Wolcott Henry from the Edmond Foulc Collection, 1930. 

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Flagstaff Holder in the Form of a Dragon, Italy, 16th century. Wrought iron: 24 x 7 x 18 inches: Purchased with Philadelphia Museum of Art Funds from the George Grey Barnard Collection, 1945

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Vicar and Moses, c. 1782-1795. Made in the factory of Ralph Wood II,  Staffordshire. Lead-glazed earthenware: 9 1/2 x 4 1/2 x 5 1/2 inches. Gift of Charlotte Zeitlin in memory of David E. Zeitlin, 1999

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Grand Salon from the Chateau de Draveil, 1735. Purchased with Philadelphia Museum of Art Funds.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Drawing Room from Lansdowne House, designed by Robert Adam, c. 1766-1775. Gift of Graeme Lorimer and Sarah Moss Lorimer in memory of George Horace Lorimer, 1931

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Gallery view of the Philadelphia Museum of Art, Gallery 366, showing two of the Four Seasons statues by an unknown artist, 1770-1790. From left, Winter as Saturn, Stone: 6 feet 7 1/2 inches × 27 1/4 inches; Autumn as Bacchus, Stone: 6 feet 7 1/2 inches × 27 1/4 inches. 

The other Four Seasons statues are Flora as Spring, 7 feet 1 1/2 inches × 27 1/4 inches  and Ceres as Summer, 7 feet 1 1/2 inches × 27 1/4 inches.

Gift of Eva Roberts Stotesbury in memory of Edward T. Stotesbury, 1938.









Friday, June 17, 2022

Art Eyewitness Book Review: Catholica: the Visual Culture of Catholicism

 

Catholica: the Visual Culture of Catholicism

By Suzanna Ivanic

Thames & Hudson, $35, 256 pages

Reviewed by Ed Voves

For over a thousand years, the Christian Church was the greatest patron of the arts and architecture in the world. Beginning in the year 312, when the Roman emperor Constantine embraced Christianity, almost every aspect of thought, culture and craft in Europe was dominated by the effort to build and maintain a civilization based on the life and teachings of Jesus of Nazareth.

Catholica, a brilliant new book published by Thames and Hudson, explores the visual record of Roman Catholicism. This was the dominant form of Christianity in Europe, until it was divided into warring camps by the publication of Martin Luther's radical views on religious doctrine in 1517. 

Despite the Reformation, Roman Catholicism survived - and thrived. This was due in no small part because of the impact of Catholic art and the religious convictions upon which it was founded. After losing control over parts of Germany, England and the Netherlands, Roman Catholicism spread to Latin America, much of sub-Saharan Africa and to Asian countries like the Philippines. 

Roman Catholicism still exerts a strong and inspiring influence over millions of faithful Christians the world over. Yet many of its works of art, or sacred objects like the vestments worn by Catholic clergy and vessels used in devotional ceremonies, have an unfamiliar, even unsettling, feel to them. 

For instance, many people today have no idea as to the significance of the golden vessel known as the monstrance. 



Diego de Atienza, Spanish artist in Ecuador & Peru, Monstrance, c. 1646 

The monstrance is used to display the Host, unleavened bread transformed into Christ's body during the Mass. The role and importance of this sacred object is, needless to say, difficult to grasp by those unacquainted with Roman Catholicism. Thanks to Catholica, the process of understanding and appreciating Christian art and ideas will be a great deal easier.

Catholica was written by Suzanna Ivanic, who teaches history at the University of Kent, England. Ivanic has excellent credentials for investigating the works of art, architecture and artifacts of Catholicism, for her research field (according to the publisher's blurb) is the "lived religion and material and visual culture in Central Europe."

Equally important, Ivanic writes with conviction and insight. Indeed, the sensitivity of her commentary and the scope of her knowledge are awesome and admirable.

Catholica is organized into three parts. Tenet surveys the basics of Roman Catholic religious doctrine; Locus examines the sites where Catholics worship, ranging from magnificent Gothic cathedrals to prayer sites in the homes of the faithful; Spiritus focuses on Christian devotion, as practiced by communities and by individuals.

As noted above, many Catholic works of art or devotional objects may be unfamiliar. In some cases, they are "wondrously strange" and Ivanic has her work cut-out to explain them. This she does in "decoding" units where baffling, arcane details of famous paintings and church architecture are analyzed. 



Pieter Bruegel the Elder, The Fight Between Carnival and Lent, 1559

The Fight Between Carnival and Lent, painted by Pieter Bruegel the Elder in 1559 is one of the masterpieces decoded by Ivanic. Indeed, it was created with exactly that purpose in mind. A wealth of examples of folly, greed, gluttony and social mayhem during Mardi Gras was included in Bruegel's painting. These are compared with the sober performance of Christian charity during the season of Lent.



Bruegel's The Fight Between Carnival and Lent (details)

Other "decoded" paintings include The Penitent Magdalen by Georges de la Tour (c. 1640) and Caravaggio's The Seven Works of Mercy (1607). 



Anonymous (Japan), The Arrival of the Europeans, early 1600's

A fascinating Japanese screen painting, dating to the early 1600's, shows Catholic missionaries from the Jesuit and Franciscan orders in one of its vignettes. Here we can see the global outreach of Christianity as seen - and very attentively examined - by non-Europeans.

Profiles of important themes in Christian culture also feature prominently in the book. These range widely from the important events and rites associated with the seasons of Christmas and Easter, the "roles" assigned to the Virgin Mary - Mother of Sorrows, Mary of the Rosary, etc. - and the Catholic ways of coping with Death. This last profile is especially compelling, as I will comment in more detail later in this review.

With this investigative format in mind, it might seem that Catholica is primarily a reference work. Indeed it is, but the best way to appreciate Catholica is to begin on page one and follow Ivanic as she guides us along the path of Roman Catholicism's engagement with art of the spirt.

The profoundly moving nature of Ivanic's text is due to more than her command of source material. She writes about matters of religious faith with a real sense of what Christian belief in God and the divine ordering of the universe is like. 

A brief quotation from Ivanic's discussion of the role of Abbot Suger (1081-1151) regarding the rise of Gothic cathedrals is indicative of the marvelous and moving narrative of Catholica:

Key to understanding the birth of the Gothic is Suger's emphasis on the transformative power of the liturgical performance. Just as during the Mass the bread and wine are turned into the body and blood of Christ, so does the ritual performance of the cathedral transform it from stones, glass and metal into a divinely powerful space... 

Christianity traces its origin to Judaism. Like Jews, Christians base their beliefs on the written (and sanctified) words of the Bible. But early in the history of the Christian Church, images of Jesus, the Virgin Mary and saints like the Apostle Peter were treated with an unprecedented sense of importance. 



Metalcut print showing The Mass of St. Gregory, late 1400's

Pope Gregory I (540-604) realized that visual representations of the episodes of Biblical history and the life of Jesus were essential teaching tools. Vast numbers of Christians were illiterate and thus excluded from reflecting upon and understanding what they heard preached by the Christian clergy.

Yet, images of Jesus and other saintly people from the Bible were potentially dangerous. Pope Gregory was aware that Christians might come to adore sacred pictures or religious objects, rather than worship God. It was a risk he felt compelled to take. Ivanic quotes Gregory's famous, and hugely influential, pronouncement.

It is one thing to worship a picture and another to learn from the story of a picture what is to be worshiped. For what writing conveys to those who can read, a picture shows to the ignorant ... and for that very reason a picture is like a lesson for the people.

To understand a picture, people need to identify with its subject and message. As a result, depictions of the great events of the Bible and the life of Jesus stressed relevancy rather than historical accuracy of setting and costume. Artists frequently showed biblical characters in contemporary attire, surrounded by details of architecture and artifacts similar to those of the people gathered together to view such works of art as part of Christian worship.

Catholic images were modified to suit geography and social convention as part of the Christian missionary movement. One of the book's most fascinating images comes from Ethiopia in the 1600's where Jesuit missionaries sought to influence the Christian population to embrace Catholicism, rather than the version they practiced which was based on the Coptic Church of Egypt.



Anonymous (Ethiopia) Diptych of Life of Virgin Mary, c. 1630's-1700

The diptych above presents episodes from the life of Mary, mother of Jesus.  The bottom scene of the left-hand panel presents Mary showing the infant Jesus to the Three Kings, who look like Ethiopian nobles rather than magi from the Middle East.  Above, shepherds, having already seen Jesus, play a hockey-like game called genna


Diptych of Life of Virgin Mary (detail)

Unfortunately, such culturally-sensitive artwork did not always convince. The mass of Ethiopia's people resisted conversion to Catholicism, even when the country's ruler, Emperor Susenyos, did so in 1622. After years of dissension and civil war, the Jesuit mission ended in failure. 

Spanish missionaries experienced greater success in grafting Catholic cultural forms onto native roots in Mexico, Peru and other Latin American nations. The process led to the creation of enduring expressions of Christian piety. The image of Our Lady of Guadalupe (below) was based on the religious visions of a Mexican native, Juan Diego, in 1531, only a few years after the Spanish conquest of the Aztecs. 



Anonymous artist (Mexican), Our Virgin & Child of Guadalupe, 1745

Juan Diego's vision of Mary was depicted in various amalgams of ethnic attributes and styles of clothing. The facial features of Our Lady of Guadalupe in this version, almost obscured by layers of sumptuous Spanish robes, bears a strong resemblance to the Aztec earth goddess, Tonatzin. 

Roman Catholicism never missed an opportunity to present the guiding principles of Christianity in ways that believers and would-be believers could appreciate and enjoy. From soaring stained glass windows to the charming maiolica ensemble of movable figures at the Last Supper, Catholic art was on view everywhere one looked.


Maiolica model of the Last Supper, from Faenza, Italy, 1500's

Judged in this manner, Roman Catholic art represents an early - and very successful - form of corporate "branding." But there is one staggering difference. 

Modern-day public relations techniques emphasize sprightly images and upbeat banter to keep customers buying, consuming and buying some more in an endless cycle of happy days and Happy Meals. Roman Catholicism, by contrast, fixated upon the inevitable negation of earthly pleasure and human life by Death. 

The supreme symbol of Roman Catholicism is the Cross, the emblem based upon the crucifixion of Jesus. This form of torture and execution was reserved for slaves and criminals under Roman rule. 

Early Christians did not display the Cross, so terrible was the memory of Jesus' execution. Also, they lived in the daily expectation of the End Time. When the Apocalypse did not come, the brutal fact of Jesus' crucifixion remained. But so too, did the Christian believe that Jesus had secured redemption for them from sin, with the promise of immortal life for the souls of those who believed in him.

Death, Christ's death, has conquered death. 

This paradox, which St. Paul called the "scandal of the Cross," placed the reviled symbol of a slave's execution at the summit of human devotion, a place it still holds for millions. Christians, especially Roman Catholics, have created, collected and cherished works of art related to the Crucifixion since the Middle Ages and continue to do so. 



Aelbert Bouts, The Man of Sorrows, c.1525

From sublime depictions of the Crucifixion by Giotto and Velazquez to harrowing, nightmarish portraits of Jesus, like Aelbert Bouts' The Man of Sorrows, c. 1525, to tattooed images of the crucified Christ on human skin, the Cross is ubiquitous, recognizable to believers and detractors alike.

There will never - hopefully - be a final word on Christian art. For now, in a deeply troubled world, menaced by disease and war, Susanna Ivanic's Catholica is a much needed volume. To her, we will leave the final word.

The art of Catholicism is the art of the human condition. Devotional artworks that dwell on the gaze of the grieving mother or the lifeless body of Jesus resonate with the soul. They are designed to raise one's spirit and deepen one's reservoirs of faith, inspiring intense, reverential joy and pain.

***

Text: Copyright of Ed Voves, all rights reserved. 

Introductory Image: Cover art for Catholica by Suzanna Ivanic. Courtesy of Thames & Hudson

Diego de Atienza (Spanish, born in Ecuador, 1610) Monstrance, c. 1646. Silver gilt with enamel, cast, chased, and engraved: Height: 22 1/2 in. (57.2 cm) Metropolitan Museum of Art. The Friedsam Collection, Bequest of Michael Friedsam, 1931. #32.100.231a, b.

Pieter Bruegel the Elder The Fight Between Carnival and Lent, 1559,  Oil-on-panel: 118 cm × 164 cm (46 in × 65 in). Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna

Anonymous (Japan) The Arrival of the Europeans, early 1600's. Pair of six-panel folding screens; ink, color, gold, and gold leaf on paper: each screen: 41 3/8 in. × 8 ft. 6 5/8 in. (105.1 × 260.7 cm) Metropolitan Museum of Art.  Mary Griggs Burke Collection, Gift of the Mary and Jackson Burke Foundation, 2015. #2015.300.109.1, .2

Master of the Church Fathers' Border (German, late 15th century) The Mass of Saint Gregory, late 1400's. Metalcut with traces of hand-coloring; second state:  13-7/8 x 19-15/16 in.; 10-5/8 x 7-7/16 in. Metropolitan Museum of Art. Harris Brisbane Dick Fund, 1924 # 2448

Anonymous (Ethiopia) Diptych of Life of Virgin Mary, c. 1630's-1700. Wooden diptych: distemper, gesso and cloth, each painted panel having three registers, H x W x D: 51.7 x 43 x 2.5 cm (20 3/8 x 16 15/16 x 1 in.). Smithsonian National Museum of African Art. Gift of Ciro R. Taddeo in memory of Raffael and Alessandra Taddeo. #98-3-3

Anonymous (Mexico) Our Virgin & Child of Guadalupe, 1745. Oil on canvas:106 x 84.5 cm. Wellcome Library, London. #44828i

The Last Supper (Faenza, Italy), 1500's. Tin-glazed earthenware (maiolica): H. 8 1/2"; W. 12 5/6" (14 3/4" with base); L. 22 7/8" (24 1/2" with base) Museum of Fine Arts, Boston. Bequest of R. Thornton Wilson in memory of Florence Ellsworth Wilson  #1983.61

Aelbert Bouts & workshop (Netherlandish, ca. 1451/54–1549) The Man of Sorrows, c. 1525. Oil on oak: arched top, 17 1/2 x 11 1/4 in. (44.5 x 28.6 cm) Metropolitan Museum of Art.  The Friedsam Collection, Bequest of Michael Friedsam, 1931. # 32.100.55

Friday, January 31, 2020

Art Eyewitness Book Review: Fra Angelico and the Rise of the Florentine Renaissance


Fra Angelico and the Rise of the Florentine Renaissance


By Carl Brandon Strehlke and Ana Gonzales Mozo

Thames & Hudson-Prado Museum/255 pages/$40

Reviewed by Ed Voves

For art scholars, conscientious about assigning correct dates to works of art, the Renaissance presents a problem. When did this "rebirth" of Western art begin? When did painting and sculpture in Europe cease being International Gothic in style and start exhibiting the hallmarks of Renaissance theory and practice?

Most histories of the Renaissance focus on 1401 as the "takeoff" of the Renaissance in Italy. That year marked the momentous competition between Lorenzo Ghiberti and Filippo Brunelleschi to design the bronze doors of the Baptistery for the city of Florence. If one requires timeline accuracy, then Ghiberti vs. Brunelleschi provides a serviceable date.

The year 1425 is also a contender as the alternative birthday for the Renaissance. A brilliant new book, Fra Angelico and the Rise of the Florentine Renaissance, investigates the events of that decisive moment in art history. Published by Thames & Hudson, this thoughtful and lavishly illustrated book documents a major exhibition at the Prado during the summer of 2019 to help celebrate the 200th anniversary of Spain's greatest museum. 

A quarter of a century after the Ghiberti- Brunelleschi competition, a Dominican monk named Fra Giovanni da Fiesole painted a puzzling work entitled Annunciation and Expulsion of Adam and Eve from Paradise. In many ways, his work looks notably medieval. Yet closer inspection reveals that this egg tempora painting on wood panel exhibits Brunelleschi's revolutionary art theories. 

The implications of shifting the start of the Renaissance to this 1425 painting are unsettling. The key player in this scenario now becomes a monk who was proficient in manuscript illumination and application of gold leaf, hardly the skill set of a "Renaissance Man."


Fra Angelico, The Virgin with the Pomegranate, ca. 1424-25

Fra Giovanni da Fiesole is better known today as Fra Angelico. Born Guido di Pietro, around the year 1395, he was a native Tuscan from the town of Vicchio, near to Florence. Trained as an artist, he joined the Dominican Order, along with his brother, who was also a noted illustrator of manuscripts.

Not only did Fra Angelico paint some of the most ethereal, indeed celestial, beings imaginable, but his own personality was close to being angelic. He was held in high esteem during his lifetime, as an artist of exceptional talent and as a devout Christian. In 1982, Fra Angelico was beatified by Pope John Paul II, an important step on the road to sainthood.

Fra Angelico excelled in more than traditional medieval artistic conventions. Both Carl Brandon Strehlke, the primary author of the Thames & Hudson book, and Ana Gonzales Mozo, who contributed a perceptive essay on Fra Angelico's painting technique, affirm that he incorporated advanced ideas from Brunelleschi, solidly based on mathematics, in the Annunciation and Expulsion of Adam and Eve from Paradise.



Fra Angelico, Annunciation and Expulsion of Adam and Eve from Paradise, 1425-1426

Strehlke, Curator Emeritus of the Philadelphia Museum of Art, notes that Fra Angelico took the bold step to accurately position his protagonists, the Angel Gabriel and the Virgin Mary within an architectural setting in the picture. They are not floating in space but occupy a set position, a "you are here" point established by mathematical calculation. Strehlke writes:

The architecture of the Virgin's house shows how open Angelico was to Brunelleschi's ideas about drawing buildings in spatial recession. It is the earliest surviving painted example of architecture in perspective. The manipulation of the orthogonals, horizon line, and vanishing point suggests careful consideration of what Brunelleschi's biographer Antonio Manetti noted 'painters today term perspective.'

Fra Angelico's painting depicts the interface - we might also say the intrusion - of the realm of the sacred into human reality. Although the Virgin Mary's house has a theater-set ambiance, Fra Angelico revealed that he was adept at utilizing Brunelleschi's methodology in the depiction of the small side room which has a "homey" feel to it. Look through that door and you see a small patch of the real world shown in perspective.

Fra Angelico, as a Dominican monk, had also to be faithful to the theological precepts of his Order's great theologian, St. Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274). Aquinas believed that reason, if founded upon faith, will lead to understanding and union with God.


Fra Angelico, Annunciation and Expulsion of Adam and Eve from Paradise (detail)

The painting of the Annunciation is a visualization of this process. The streams of golden light proceeding from the hands of God represent the Incarnation, the act of divine inspiration by which Mary, a virgin, will give birth to Jesus the Son of God. 



Fra Angelico, Annunciation and Expulsion of Adam and Eve from Paradise (detail)

Mary is mystified by the Angel Gabriel's entreaty but accepts that she has been chosen to be mother of the Messiah. This act of faith engenders an awareness, a deeper form of knowledge, that God is intervening in the lives of human beings.

"Human salvation," Aquinas wrote, "demands the divine disclosure of truths surpassing reason."

Hard to believe?  Aquinas, the "Angelic Doctor," is famous for his voluminous, densely argued philosophical treatises, but he "cuts to the quick" on the point of faith.  

"To one who has faith, no explanation is necessary. To one without faith, no explanation is possible."

The faith-acceptance-awareness process is what we see depicted in the major incident of Annunciation and Expulsion of Adam and Eve from Paradise. But what about the  Paradise Lost "sidebar"?  Why was this seemingly-unrelated episode from Genesis placed in juxtaposition with the Annunciation?

The answer reveals more of the "medieval" roots of the Renaissance. 

Fra Angelico painted Annunciation and Expulsion of Adam and Eve from Paradise for the Dominican Order's church, San Domenico in Fiesole. The Thames & Hudson book has an intriguing drawing showing how this painting was displayed. It was positioned on a large frame which straddled the width of the church. Called the Rood Screen, this framework separated the nave of the church where the congregation stood or knelt from the sanctuary and choir. In this most sacred area stood the altar where the priest and monks gathered. Here the priest conducted the sacrifice of the Mass, turning bread and wine into Christ's body and blood.

The positioning of the Rood Screen prevented direct observation of the sacred ceremony by the lay people in the church. By way of compensation, paintings and statues were placed on the Rood Screen for them to contemplate as they listened to the clergy conduct the Mass. 

One of the paintings hung on San Domenico's Rood Screen was Annunciation and Expulsion of Adam and Eve from Paradise. 


Fra Angelico
            Annunciation and Expulsion of Adam and Eve from Paradise (detail)

An important hymn/prayer of the Roman Catholic liturgy during the Renaissance was Salve Regina, in honor of Mary, mother of Jesus. It was included in the evening prayer service known as Compline. The opening words of the prayer reveal why Fra Angelico painted Adam and Eve's banishment from Paradise on the same poplar board with the Angel Gabriel and the Virgin Mary. 

Hail, holy Queen, Mother of Mercy,
Hail our life, our sweetness and our hope.
To thee do we cry,
Poor banished children of Eve; 
To thee do we send up our sighs,
Mourning and weeping in this valley of tears.

The words of the hymn would have been powerfully reinforced by the imagery of the painting. Humanity's suffering, caused by the disobedience of Adam and Eve, would be redeemed through the agency of Mary's faith and the life and death of her son, Jesus.

Fra Angelico created Annunciation and Expulsion of Adam and Eve from Paradise in 1425Another version of the banishment of Adam and Eve was being painted at the same time in Florence: Masaccio's Expulsion of Adam and Eve in the Brancacci Chapel of the Santa Maria del Carmine Church. Fra Angelico almost certainly was aware of Masaccio's handling of this episode from Genesis. While Masaccio portrayed the existential grief of Adam and Eve, Fra Angelico chose to show the pair as less grief-stricken and ultimately redeemable.

Masaccio's Expulsion may appeal more to modern interpretations and ideas. Yet, Fra Angelico was an artist capable of great psychological insight. One of the supporting works in the Prado exhibition reveals the profound extent of his ability to probe human character and emotions.

In 1909, acting on the advice of Bernard Berenson, the Philadelphia collector, John G. Johnson, bought what was believed to be a portrait of St. Francis of Assisi. Johnson bequeathed his collection to the Philadelphia Museum of Art, including this work attributed to Fra Angelico.


Fra Angelico
                          Head and Torso of Saint Francis of Assisi, ca. 1427-30  

Berenson was correct in his assessment but only years later was it discovered that this image of St. Francis had been a part of an ensemble of two saints praying at the foot of the Cross. The figures of St. Francis, his companion on the other side of the Cross, St. Nicholas of Bari and of the martyred Jesus were all painted to appear as if they were statues, thus enhancing the realism of the scene.

Close inspection of the St. Francis "portrait," which survived the centuries since 1430 in much better condition than St. Nicholas, reveals the degree of Fra Angelico's close study of human physiognomy. The sagging "bags" beneath the eyes, the pinched features of the face, the straining neck muscles, all testify to the physical toll and privation of St. Francis'  austere devotion to God.

It is vital to remember that there is no portrait of St. Francis, drawn or painted from life. An imagined likeness was created about three years after his death in 1226. Fra Angelico's depiction of the beloved saint from Assisi is thus a psychological portrait and all the more convincing for being so. Fra Angelico, as a monk, well knew the personal cost of a life of sanctity. It is obvious - at least to me - that Fra Angelico painted the figures in this devotional work while in a state of meditative awareness of Christ, St. Francis and St. Nicholas.

This sense of communion between artist and subject is a key facet of Icon painting in the Greek and Russian Orthodox traditions. Fra Angelico, working according to the Western, Latin canon of Christianity, brought intense levels of spirituality to his work. Regardless of the form of interpretation, whether it was the medieval-looking Annunciation and Expulsion of Adam and Eve from Paradise or the visceral realism of his St. Francis, Fra Angelico painted in "communion" with the divine.

Fra Angelico was later to combine his skill in narrative painting with the profound feel for character and emotion which we see in his St. Francis of Assisi. 

In 1436, Cosimo de Medici funded the rebuilding of the Dominican church and monastery of San Marco in Florence.  Fra Angelico was tasked with painting in fresco a contemplative scene from the life of Christ in each of the monk's cells and larger devotional works in the public spaces of the building. The series was brought to a high state of perfection, as can be seen in the version of the Annunciation which Fra Angelico painted in one of the corridors of San Marco.
     

Fra Angelico
            Annunciation fresco, corridor of the dormitory of San Marco, ca. 1438                                      
Observing Fra Angelico's work decades after his death in 1455, Michelangelo delivered a heartfelt testimonial.

"One has to believe that this good monk has visited paradise and been allowed to choose his models there."

***

Text: Copyright of Ed Voves, all rights reserved 

Images of Fra Angelico paintings from the collection of the Prado in Madrid, Spain, are  courtesy of the Prado web pages:

https://www.museodelprado.es/en/the-collection/art-work/the-virgin-with-the-pomegranate/61b654df-1de2-483f-88bb-4

https://www.museodelprado.es/en/the-collection/art-work/the-annunciation/9b02b6c9-3618-4a92-a6b7-26f9076fcb67

Introductory Image:
Fra Angelico and the Rise of the Florentine Renaissance, 2020 (book cover) courtesy Thames & Hudson

Fra Angelico (Italian, ca. 1395-1455) The Virgin with the Pomegranate, ca.1424. Egg tempera and tooled gold on poplar panel: Height: 87 cm. (height) X 59 cm. (width).  Museo Nacional del Prado, # P8233. Image © the Museo Nacional del Prado. 

Fra Angelico (Italian, ca. 1395-1455) Annunciation and Expulsion of Adam and Eve from Paradise, 1425-1426. Tempera on poplar panel: Height: 190.3 cm. (height) X 191.5 cm (width).  Museo Nacional del Prado, # P0015. Image © the Museo Nacional del Prado.

Fra Angelico (Italian, ca. 1395-1455) Head and Torso of Saint Francis of Assisi, ca. 1427-30. Egg tempera and tooled gold on poplar panel: Height: 61 cm. (height) X 35.2 cm. (width). Philadelphia Museum of Art. John G. Johnson collection. 1917. cat. 14.

Fra Angelico (Italian, ca. 1395-1455) Annunciation fresco, corridor of the dormitory of San Marco, ca. 1438.  Fresco: 230 cm. x 321 cm.  Museo di San Marco, Florence.