Showing posts with label Covid-19 Virus. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Covid-19 Virus. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 26, 2023

Living Art: Art Eyewitness Tenth Anniversary

Living Art

Art Eyewitness Tenth Anniversary
2013-2023

By Ed Voves

Photos by Anne Lloyd

Ten years, by most standards of reckoning, is not a long time. In terms of recorded history, a decade represents less than a blink of the eye. Much less.

Yet, for most people, as they plant their footsteps on the path of life, ten years is a significant stretch of time. For art movements or literary journals, which often have remarkably brief life spans, to celebrate a tenth anniversary is a big deal.

All of this rumination is by way of announcing that Art Eyewitness is now ten years old. 

To find an appropriate "signature" picture to introduce our anniversary presented a bit of a quandary. How do you represent the progression of time by means of a single image? 

Classic Hollywood movies used to denote the passing years on film by showing short sequences of ocean waves washing ashore, autumn leaves whirling in the wind or grains of sand in an hour glass. A single still photo or illustration of this sort would not work at all in an anniversary "think" piece for Art Eyewitness.

Fortunately, my wife Anne provided a pair of pictures that suits the occasion perfectly. With her trusty "point and shoot" camera, Anne brilliantly evokes art's ability to freely traverse the corridors of time.



Anne Lloyd, (Photo 2022)
View of Leo Villereal's Multiverse, 2008, at the National Gallery of Art
 
During a recent trip to the National Gallery in Washington D.C., Anne snapped a couple of quick pictures of Multiverse. Installed in 2008, Leo Villereal's light "sculpture" uses 41,000 LED lights to transform the moving walkway in the concourse of the National Gallery into a portal to the Cosmos. Like stepping into Heraclitus' river, each venture through the Multiverse leads to unique experiences of art at the National Gallery. 



Anne Lloyd, (Photo 2022)
Gallery view of Sargent and Spain at the National Gallery of Art,
 showing John Singer Sargent's La Carmencita Dancing

The journey of Art Eyewitness over the past ten years has endeavored to explore the visual arts in a similar "moving" fashion. Art Eyewitness is a venture into a creative realm which is both ageless and ever-changing. The images and insights which fill our eyes and minds, Anne and I share with like-minded souls.

The images which we share are not entirely derived from visits to art museums and reviewing special exhibitions. Occasionally, we have included some exceptional examples of Anne's street photography and we plan to investigate this fascinating genre in the future.


Anne Lloyd, (Photo 2021)
Butterfly and Zinnia, 2021 

Originally, Art Eyewitness aimed to include classic films in its repertoire. Copyright fees, even for still photos from vintage movies, are way beyond the means of a "mom and pop" non-profit blog like ours. The same is true for pictures of works of modern and  contemporary art. 

Two factors have saved Art Eyewitness from being "stuck" in the past.

The greatly appreciated support of publishers, especially Thames and Hudson, has provided a stream of books for review and selected images on topics which, otherwise, we could never have addressed.



Modern Art in Detail, by Susie Hodge (Thames & Hudson, 2017)  

The second factor involves the person closest to my heart. It was my wife, Anne, who encouraged me to start Art Eyewitness. The wonderful internet journal I was writing for, the California Literary Review, ceased publication in the spring of 2013. Anne was immediate and inspiring in her response to the sad tidings.

"Start your own art blog!"

Rather hesitantly, I agreed. But what really got "the ball rolling" were the sensational gallery photos that Anne began to take in the summer of 2015. It is Anne's photos which put the "eyewitness" in Art Eyewitness! 

This was never more true than at the Michelangelo: Divine Draftsman and Designer exhibition and the press preview of the David Hockney retrospective, both from 2017 at the Metropolitan Museum of Art. 



Anne Lloyd, (Photo 2017)
   Gallery view of the Michelangelo exhibit at the Metropolitan Museum 


Anne Lloyd, (Photo 2017)
David Hockney at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, Nov. 20, 2017

Anne has certainly not rested on her photographic laurels since 2017. Almost every Art Eyewitness review includes "you are there" photos, placing you, the reader, in the exhibition gallery with us.



Anne Lloyd, (Photo 2023)
Gallery view of the Of God and Country exhibit at the Philadelphia Museum of Art, showing S.L Jones' Preacher and His Wife

It is vital to note that the Art Eyewitness "journey" has been facilitated by the incredible generosity of curators and public relations staff at the museums which Anne and I visit. 

The list is long - the National Gallery, the Metropolitan Museum, the Morgan Library & Museum, the Neue Gallerie, MOMA, the Jewish Museum of NY, the Phillips Collection, the Barnes Foundation, the Philadelphia Museum of Art and many more. 

To all of the wonderful people on the museum staffs who make Art Eyewitness possible, our gratitude is lasting and profound. 



Anne Lloyd, (Photo 2018)
From left: Nichole R. Myers, Dallas Museum of Art, Sylvie Patry, Musee d'Orsay and Cindy Kang of the Barnes Foundation 

I wish that I could include a survey of the photos which Anne has taken, over the years, of art curators and conservators at work. As that is impossible, I have chosen the above photo to illustrate this theme. The charm, intelligence and dedication of the curators of the 2018 Berthe Morisot exhibition at the Barnes Foundation stands for all.

Art Eyewitness launched its journey in July 2013. Our first essay was a review of Diaghilev and the Ballets Russes, 1909-1929, at the National Gallery. Before orchestrating the great dance series which exerted such a profound influence on modern art, Sergei Diaghilev had edited a journal dedicated to art history, Mir iskusstva, meaning "World of Art." 

The title was well-chosen. Diaghilev sincerely believed that art could affect society-at-large in new and inspiring ways. Working like a man possessed, Diaghilev devoted himself to translating vision into reality.



Jean Cocteau's Poster for the Ballets Russes, 1913

After several years of sensational success with the Ballets Russes, Diaghilev's hopes for a "world of art" were dashed by the outbreak of World War I. The Bolshevik Revolution and the Influenza Epidemic of 1918 followed in a chain of disaster which eventually led to even more, unspeakable, horrors. 

Today, as the world continues to grapple with the effects of the Covid-19 Pandemic and the outbreak of a major war in Europe, we seem to be reliving the experience of Diaghilev and his generation. Hopefully my fears are exaggerated, but there are many well-informed commentators writing in this vein, too.

Art and adversity are certainly no strangers. One needs to remember that - constantly.



Anne Lloyd, (Photo 2020)
The Rainbow Portrait of Queen Elizabeth I 
 Attributed to Marcus Gheeraerts the Younger, ca. 1602

Reflecting on my visits to the 2022 exhibition at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, The Tudors: Art and Majesty, I am reminded of the contrast between courtly splendor and actual living conditions. The final years of the reign of Elizabeth I, ca.1600, were a positively wretched time for many in England and throughout Europe. Yet Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, Twelfth Night and Hamlet, Caravaggio's greatest paintings including The Calling of St. Matthew (1599-1600) and Supper at Emmaus (1601) and Cervantes' Don Quixote, Part I (published in 1605) all date to this tormented period.

The spring and summer months of 2020 brought a comparable time of suffering to our doorsteps. It is too early to dispassionately judge works of art or books created during the three years of the Covid-19 crisis and contrast them with those mentioned above from the turn of the seventeenth century. Spring Cannot be Cancelled by David Hockney and Martin Gayford is certainly a worthy response to the Covid crisis which deserves to be so considered. 

Time, the stern and capricious arbitrator of merit, will tell. But I believe that one judgment can be made - without hesitation. The art museum community rendered invaluable service as Covid-19 threatened the norms of cultural life and emotional well-being.



Anne Lloyd, (Photo 2020)
Empty gallery, Spring 2020, at the National Gallery of Art,
 showing paintings by Edgar Degas

As art institutions closed in mid-March 2020, a widespread network of museum staff members - museum directors, curators, IT and public relations specialists - responded to the crisis by providing "virtual" access to great works of art, historical archives, digital tours of museum galleries and much more. 

An Art Eyewitness essay I wrote at the time, focusing on the efforts of the Metropolitan Museum, gives a brief survey of the initiatives which shared a wide array of art resources with the public. This devotion to art lovers, everywhere, was undertaken when museum staff members had to deal with anxiety, sickness and privation in their own lives, too. 

The human toll of Covid-19 was "brought home" to me at the press preview of New York: 1962-1964. On a scorching day in July 2022, Anne and I traveled to the Jewish Museum of New York for the opening of this major exhibit. I was primed for a superb display of mid-century American art, but the unforgettable moment of the press event came during remarks by the director of the Jewish Museum, Claudia Gould.



Anne Lloyd, (Photo 2022)
Claudia Gould, Director of the Jewish Museum, July 20, 2022 

Ms. Gould seemed "out-or-sorts" as she came to the podium. During her remarks, her voice bespoke of sorrow and emotional distress. Ms. Gould described how the New York: 1962-1964 exhibition had been planned and organized by one of the great art scholars and curators of our contemporary era, Germano Celant.

Germano Celant, born in Italy in 1940, was a significant figure in the art world since the late 1960's. He was a major proponent of the Arte Povera movement and had been a curator for several years at the Guggenheim Museum in New York. His abundant talents and experience made Celant the perfect choice to lead the design of an exhibition devoted to the Manhattan art scene in the "Sixties."

As he worked on the New York: 1962-1964 exhibit, Celant contracted the Corona virus and died, aged 79. Celant's shocking death could well have derailed the entire project, but Gould and the curators at the Jewish Museum rose to the challenge. New York: 1962-1964 was truly an outstanding exhibition, an example of triumph arising from tragedy.



Anne Lloyd, (Photo 2022)
        Gallery view of New York: 1962-1964 at the Jewish Museum, showing Kenneth Noland's Tropical Zone, 1964.

As the Covid crisis abated and museums reopened, exhibitions which devoted curators had worked on during the "lockdown" began to go on display. One of the earliest and most significant was Winslow Homer: Crosscurrents. This exhibit appeared at the Met during the spring and summer of 2022, later travelling to the National Gallery in London.



Ed Voves, (Photo 2022)
        Gallery view of Winslow Homer: Crosscurrents at the Metropolitan Museum, showing Homer's The Gulf Stream, 1899.

The key painting of Winslow Homer: Crosscurrents was The Gulf Stream. This stunning work shows an African-American sailor in a battered schooner, menaced by sharks and an approaching storm. Will the crew of a ship in the distance see him and come to his rescue? However the viewer answers that question, there is no doubt that The Gulf Stream is a relevant painting for the travail of our time, as it was for Homer's.

Winslow Homer (1836-1910) first gained renown as an illustrator for Harper's Weekly. His experience recording the American Civil War led Homer to take  unexpected paths in his art. Many of his post-war paintings record the lives of melancholy young women who may have lost husbands or lovers in the Civil War, courageous seamen and their families, menaced by deadly storms, and African-Americans grappling with racial oppression. 

Homer's empathy for people confronting adversity is being carried on by the efforts of curators and art historians. A concerted effort is underway to present exhibitions of the work of artists - African-Americans, women, immigrants, "working-class" people - previously denied opportunity and fair treatment. 



Ed Voves, (Photo 2019)
    Gallery view of Augusta Savage: Renaissance Women at the New York Historical Society. Boy on a Stump, ca. 1930, in the foreground. 

Art Eyewitness has been pleased to review a number of these, including the much-needed reappraisal of Augusta Savage, whose brilliant sculptures are among the greatest works of art created during the Harlem Renaissance. This exhibition appeared at the New York Historical Society (NYHS) during 2019. 

The NYHS later mounted an exhibit devoted the German immigrant, Winold Reiss, an amazingly versatile artist whose sensitive portraits of the leaders and community figures of the Harlem Renaissance complemented Savage's sculptures to perfection. Both were superbly designed shows, worthy additions to the long list of outstanding exhibitions at the NYHS.

The Barnes Foundation in Philadelphia deserves special recognition for its exhibitions devoted to self-taught artists - and a happy 100th birthday salute from Art Eyewitness.



Ed Voves, (Photo 2020)
        Elijah Pierce's Your Life is a Book, ca. 1940's, displayed at 
the Barnes Foundation's 2020 exhibition, Elijah Pierce's America

Among its recent, stellar exhibitions, the Barnes has documented the achievements of Elijah Pierce and William Edmundson. These African-American sculptors, working during the early decades of the twentieth century, not only blazed a trail for later generations but powerfully demonstrated the importance of religious beliefs and community values in the creation of meaningful art.

Trying to strike a balance in an appraisal of ten years of art exhibitions - and nearly three hundred reviews and essays - is not the easiest of endeavors. There is always the temptation to try and comment on this or that exhibit to make sure that the early years or a favorite artist receive their due. 

I am going to resist adding to the length of an already long anniversary essay. Instead, I will mention one more exhibit and call it a "wrap."

During the autumn of 2018, the Neue Gallerie in New York devoted a special exhibition to the German Expressionists, Franz Marc and August Macke. I had hoped for years that these artists, both killed in World War I, would be the subject of a thorough examination, especially one that enabled viewers to grasp the spiritual, almost mystical, elements of their art. The Neue Gallerie exhibition lived up to my hopes and then some.



Anne Lloyd, (Photo 2018)
Franz Marc's Deer in the Forest II, 1914

Franz Marc is famous for valuing animals as spiritual beings. His inseparable companion was a Siberian Shepherd dog named "Russi" whom he painted several times, including a "metaphysical" portrait entitled Hund vor der Welte or How a Dog Sees the World. 

Human beings see the world, partly through the prism of art. But animals and art museums are not a good fit. Or so I thought.

Recently, Anne and I were paying a return visit to Whistler's Mother now on special loan to the Philadelphia Museum of Art. To our very great surprise, we watched as a fellow patron calmly walk down the grand staircase, with a Golden Retriever in hand.



   Anne Lloyd, (Photo 2023)
Gallery views of Philadelphia Museum of Art, June 26, 2023

We were incredulous, but nobody else seemed to mind, including the several guards in the vicinity.  My guess is that the fellow with the dog trains service animals. It was all I could do to keep from asking, but I making it a rule never to intrude on someone else's art "moment."



Then the guy with the Golden Retriever ambled into the gallery to spend some quality time with Whistler's Mother

 


It was all so natural, so unscripted. They came. They saw. And, after a few moments of art appreciation, they went. 



Franz Marc would have loved this art moment. Russi would have loved it too. Anne and I certainly did.

I have the zany thought that Franz Marc would have painted a picture of the scene and called it Hund vor der Kunst! 

So how would a dog see "art"?

If this gentle, well behaved Golden is any indication, art would be regarded as a part of life, a daily ritual that is both a necessity and something to be enjoyed. See it, embrace the moment and move on.

So, instead of a quote from Kenneth Clark or Andre Malroux to bring this essay to a close, I'm serving-up these images of art as an element of everyday life. Anne and I have been doing this for ten years and aim to keep on for as long as we can make it up the art museum steps.

From Art Eyewitness, thanks for ten great years.

 ***

Text copyright of Ed Voves, all rights reserved                                           

Images copyright of Anne Lloyd, all rights reserved

Introductory image: Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) View of Leo Villereal's Multiverse, 2008, National Gallery of Art, Washington D.C.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Gallery view of the Sargent and Spain at the National Gallery of Art, Washington D.C., showing John Singer Sargent's La Carmencita Dancing, 1890.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2021) Butterfly and Zinnia, 2021.

Modern Art in Detail: 75 Masterpieces by Susie Hodge, 2017 (cover) Image credit: Thames & Hudson

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2017) Gallery view of Michelangelo: Divine Draftsman and Designer, 2017, at the Metropolitan Museum of Art.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2017) David Hockney at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, November 20, 2017.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2023) Gallery view of the Of God and Country exhibition at the Philadelphia Museum of Art, showing S.L. Jones' Preacher and Wife, date unknown.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2018) Nichole R. Myers, Dallas Museum of Art, Sylvie Patry, Musee d'Orsay, and Cindy Kang of the Barnes Foundation, curators of the Berthe Morisot exhibition at the Barnes Foundation.

Jean Cocteau (French, 1889-1963) Poster advertising Nijinsky with the Ballet Russes, Theatre des Champs Elysees, Paris 1913. Printed poster: 189 cm x 129 cm. Collection of the Victoria and Albert Museum.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) The Rainbow Portrait of Queen Elizabeth I. Attributed to Marcus Gheerearts the Younger, Ca. 1602.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2020) Empty Gallery, Spring 2020, at the National Gallery of Art, Washington D.C., showing paintings by Edgar Degas.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Claudia Gould, Director of the Jewish Museum, New York, July 20, 2022.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Gallery view of New York: 1962-1964, at the Jewish Museum, New York, showing Kenneth Noland's Tropical Zone, 1964.

Ed Voves, Photo (2022) Gallery view of Winslow Homer: Crosscurrents at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, showing Homer's The Gulf Stream, 1899.

Ed Voves, Photo (2019) Gallery view of Augusta Savage: Renaissance Woman at the New York Historical Society, showing Boy on a Stump, ca. 1930. 

Ed Voves, Photo (2020) Elijah Pierce's Your Life is a Book, ca. 1940's, displayed at the Barnes Foundation's 2020 exhibition, Elijah Pierce's America.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2018) Franz Marc's Deer in the Forest II, 1914, on view at the Neue Gallerie exhibition, Franz Marc and Auguste Macke, 1909-1914.

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2022) Gallery views of the Philadelphia Museum of Art, June 26, 2023. Sequence of four photos.

Saturday, July 3, 2021

Art Eyewitness Book Review: David Hockney's Spring Cannot be Cancelled

 

Spring Cannot be Cancelled: David Hockney in Normandy

By David Hockney and Martin Gayford

Thames & Hudson/280 pages/$34.95

Reviewed by Ed Voves

Spring was a little late this year at the Royal Academy in London. The RA's big spring exhibition, scheduled to open on March 6, 2021, had to be delayed until May 23. As you might have guessed, the "on-again, off-again" Covid-19 restrictions were the reason for postponing the much-anticipated exhibit.

The frustration at having to wait was compounded by the irony of the title of the RA show - David Hockney: The Arrival of Spring, Normandy 2020. Worse still, the number of tickets to the exhibition has been limited to ensure the health and safety of the lucky few who manage to get in.

However, before decrying "cruel fate", I am relieved to say that Hockney and Martin Gayford have written a book about this "rite of spring" which will comfort art lovers unable to make it to the Royal Academy. Yes, there is nothing like seeing art in person. But from time-to-time an art book appears which is so profound in spirit and so superbly written, that reading it is a moving experience like visiting an art gallery.


Spring Cannot be Cancelled: David Hockney in Normandy is such a book.

The genesis of this remarkable book began a year and some months before the  Covid-19 threat appeared. 

On October 22, 2018, Martin Gayford received an email from Hockney. The two men, writer and artist, have been friends for many years. They co-authored two recent books, A Bigger Message and A History of Pictures.  

Gayford read Hockney's email with great interest. Hockney, born in 1937, was about to begin another adventure in his amazing career. He had found a new place to paint, Normandy in rural northwest France. But he wasn't going to do it as a tourist. He was going there to live and to paint. 

Hockney's new domicile is a steeply-roofed Norman farmhouse called La Grande Cour. He decided to buy it while on vacation to France, after spending much of the preceding decade engaged in landscape painting in his native Yorkshire. Normandy would provide a change of scenery while exploring the quiet drama of the arrival of Spring 2020.



David & Ruby in the Normandy studio, May 25th 2020. © David Hockney  Photo Credit: Jean-Pierre Gonçalves de Lima

Describing La Grande Cour to Gayford, Hockney wrote:

I think I've found a real paradise. The place is perfect for me right now. I'm less interested in what other people are doing. I'm just interested in my own work. I'm on the edge of something, a different way of drawing is coming through, and I can do it here.

This "different way of drawing" comes from an intensely focused way of looking. Much of the text of the book is drawn from emails between Hockney and Gayford about the experience of living and working in Normandy. Along with the day-to-day details of Hockney's life in the French countryside, another major theme quickly emerges. This relates to Hockney's reflections on one of the key elements of painting - perspective.

One of the first email conversations with Gayford discussed Hockney's discovery of the writings of Pavel Florensky, a Russian scholar who was executed by Stalin during the Great Purge of the 1930's. Florensky had argued against accepting one-point "vanishing" perspective as determining whether a picture is "correct" or not. 

The human eye and imagination, Florensky argued, do not work exclusively by the mathematical standards of Renaissance artists. Instead of focusing on one exclusive point, receding to infinity, our vision can relate to multiple perspectives more or less at the same time.



Andrei Rublev, Nativity, ca. 1405

This "polycentered" view  can be experienced by studying medieval icons by Andrei Rublev. Here several incidents from Christian scripture, viewed from different points of view, are depicted on the same pictorial space. Once we adjust our "spiritual" eyes, the vitality of Rublev's icon is readily apparent.

Hockney was intrigued and, as Gayford notes, his enthusiasms are "imperious." Excited by Florensky's theories on medieval art, Hockney was "primed" to look at his new surroundings from unconventional points of view. Normandy also supplied him with additional images with which to consider "polycentrism."  These images, arranged in a sequence of 75 scenes, embroidered on a 230 foot long cloth, were very close at hand to his new home at La Grand Cour - the Bayeux Tapestry.

From a political standpoint, the Bayeux Tapestry is a classic case of one-point perspective. It was designed and executed to justify the invasion of England in 1066 from the standpoint of William the Conqueror and his half-brother, Bishop Odo, who commissioned it. Women from defeated England, famous throughout Europe for their skill in embroidery, are believed to be the actual creators.

The historical details hardly concerns us - and probably were only of marginal interest to Hockney when he visited Bayeux in 2018. Instead, the Bayeux Tapestry's importance lies in its "total immersion" effect. The drama of life and war in 1066 unfolds above, below and all around, literally overwhelming our senses.



Scene from the Bayeux Tapestry, King Harold hears about Halley's Comet

What Hockney set out to do, once he settled in at La Grand Cour, was to apply some of the insights gained from pondering Florensky's ideas on perspective and the sequential, immersive format of the Bayeux Tapestry to the natural environment of his new home.

Hockney and his assistant, Jean-Pierre Goncalves de Lima, moved in to La Grand Cour during the course of 2019. Gayford, working on a book about the history of sculpture with Antony Gormley (similar to the one he co-authored with Hockney on painting) came over for a visit. Everything seemed to be working-out as planned. 

Then came Covid-19. Hockney was cut-off from England, Los Angeles and the global art scene . Yet, the travel-bans did not affect his art in the least. 



David Hockney "No. 599", 1st November 2020 
iPad painting © David Hockney 

In a brilliant insight, Gayford compared Hockney's situation, "locked-down" in rural Normandy, to Jean-Jacques Rousseau's sojourn on a small island set in a Swiss lake, the ÃŽle Saint-Pierre, during 1765. For two months, much as Henry Thoreau did at Walden Pond, Rousseau communed with nature. Rousseau's observations, shared through his writings, have influenced human awareness of nature ever since. 

Hockney now had the opportunity to do the same with his iPad and he is not a man to miss such an opportunity. But, as Gayford astutely notes, he could not  lapse into a "dream-time" state and then hearken back to his memories later. Art requires a different approach, even though the objective is the same.

Gayford writes:

While he was observing the splashes on his pond, of course, Hockney could not have been in a dream trance. He was concentrating hard on what he was seeing and on retaining a clear visual memory of it. But it is likely that the process cleared his mind of the flotsam of worries and stray thoughts that normally fills our consciousness. Several times in conversation with me he has mentioned an example of the "deep pleasure" that he gets from "just looking..."

For Hockney "just looking" translates into "just working." Hockney has one of the great work ethics of artists of modern times. He has also demonstrated an  astonishing versatility throughout his long career. This was abundantly clear at the great 2017 Metropolitan Museum retrospective and it needs to be kept in mind when comparing great set-piece paintings like Mr. and Mrs. Clark and Percy with his iPad drawings.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2016) 
Gallery view of David Hockney's Mr. and Mrs. Clark and Percy, 1971

When studying one of Hockney's great early works like Mr. and Mrs. Clark and Percy or Portrait of an Artist (Pool with Two Figures), painted in 1967, you quickly become aware that he is portraying the Eternal Now rather than a transient moment in time. Hockney was also painting in dialog with the great masters of the past, so that these stupendous works of his are breathing new life into the great traditions of art, each time we look at them.

Can we say the same for the iPad works from La Grand Cour? The individual iPad drawings were done at great speed, sometimes three a day so that Hockney could react quickly to changes in light and shadow. Therefore, comparing one of these iPad drawings to a work like Mr. and Mrs. Clark and Percy is an exercise in futility.

Judging the iPad drawings as a group - the RA exhibition is showing over one hundred of Hockney's Normandy oeuvre - is the correct approach. Hockney's great achievement at La Grand Cour is his successful integration of multiple vantage or perspective points to create a unified vision of nature as a whole.

La Grand Cour (which translates as "the big yard") is a gracious, rather than a grandiose, spot. Hockney's achievement in addressing nature from a four-acre homestead in Normandy is more remarkable than if he had tried to create a similar body of work at a dramatic location like Canyon de Chelly in the Southwest U.S.A. Once again, the ever perceptive Gayford is there to ensure that we don't miss this significant point.

The moral is this: it is not the place that is intrinsically interesting; it is the person looking at it. Wherever it is, it will be part of the world; the laws of time and space will still apply. The sun will rise and set, and so will the moon.

The moon, in fact, plays a leading role in the final chapter of the book. Hockney in Normandy and Gayford, at his home in Cambridge, England, each watched the "blue moon" of October 31, 2020, Hockney had alerted Gayford that he was going to try capture the nocturnal event.



David Hockney "No. 592", 31st October 2020 
iPad painting © David Hockney 

Clouds soon obscured Gayford's view but Hockney, working outdoors in the damp evening, began sending iPad depictions of the moon to Gayford. Later, he called Gayford, to say that he was taking a bit of a nap, in the hopes that the clouds would break and he could create even more iPad drawings of the "blue moon."

Such is the indomitable spirit of David Hockney. Just as he had refused to let the  Covid-19 lock-down "cancel" his plans to record the beauty of Spring 2020, so he wasn't about to allow a few clouds to obscure the "blue moon" over La Grand Cour.

The same can be said about Gayforth. A superb writer, Gayford is also a rare spirit, able to win the trust and cooperation of artists like Hockney. And the 2020 Covid-19 quarantine posed many challenges for him. During the course of that star-crossed year, Gayforth had a heart attack but rallied. Spring Cannot be Cancelled is a testament to him, as well as to Hockney.



David Dawson (Photo, 2018) 
David Hockney & Martin Gayford in conversation.

Spring Cannot be Cancelled, quite simply, is a marvelous book, thoughtful and inspired, brimming with what the French call elan vital.

Well into his eighties, David Hockney continues to paint with skill, insight and enthusiasm. He is, as Martin Gayford says so well, an artist who keeps "going and growing... he is teaching us a lesson not only in how to see, but also in how to live."

 ***

Text: Copyright of Ed Voves, all rights reserved. Original photo by Anne Lloyd, all rights reserved. All other images are © David Hockney, except for the cover of Spring Cannot Be Cancelled: David Hockney in Normandy which is used, Courtesy of Thames & Hudson

Introductory Image: David Hockney "No. 180", 11th April 2020. Appears on Page 112 of Spring Cannot Be Cancelled  iPad painting © David Hockney

Cover of Spring Cannot Be Cancelled: David Hockney in Normandy by Martin Gayford and David Hockney Courtesy of Thames & Hudson

David & Ruby in the Normandy studio, May 25th 2020. Appears on Page 34 of Spring Cannot Be Cancelled© David Hockney  Photo Credit: Jean-Pierre Gonçalves de Lima 

Andrei Rublev (Russian, 1360-1480) Nativity, ca. 1405. Collection of Cathedral of the Annunciation (Kremlin), Moscow, Russia. https://uploads8.wikiart.org/images/andrei-rublev/birth-of-christ.jpg

Scene from the Bayeux Tapestry, King Harold hears about Halley's Comet. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bayeux_Tapestry_32-33_comet_Halley_Harold.jpg

David Hockney "No. 599", 1st November 2020. Appears on Page 267 of Spring Cannot Be Cancelled   iPad painting © David Hockney 

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2016) Gallery view of David Hockney's Mr. and Mrs. Clark and Percy, 1971. Acrylic on canvas: 84 inches x 120.1 inches. Painting was then on view at the Tate Britain Museum.

David Hockney "No. 592", 31st October 2020. Appears on Page 264 of Spring Cannot Be Cancelled  iPad painting © David Hockney  

David Dawson (Photo, 2018) David Hockney & Martin Gayford in conversation. Appears on Page 18 of Spring Cannot Be Cancelled. Credit David Dawson


Wednesday, December 30, 2020

Art Eyewitness Looks at the Art Scene in 2020

 

Reflections on the Art Scene during 2020

By Ed Voves

World War II lasted five years and one day. For almost the entire span of that terrible time, the collection of the National Gallery in London was stored in a disused slate mine, located at Manod in Wales. When the worst of the German air bombardment of London had abated in 1942, one picture per month was brought from Manod and placed on display in the museum. 

The first "Picture of the Month" at the National Gallery was Titian's Noli Me Tangere, painted around 1514. 


The First Picture of the Month at the National Gallery, London, 1942

Titian, Noli Me Tangere, ca. 1514 

The title of Titian's masterpiece comes from the command of Jesus to Mary Magdalene after the Resurrection. "Do not touch me," Jesus said and these words were fortunately reflected by the wartime turn of events. No shrapnel fragments from a German bomb "touched" Titian's masterpiece nor any of the other works of art shown to culture-starved Londoners during the war years.

This past year has seen challenges which recall the empty exhibition spaces at the National Gallery during World War II - and the tragic toll of human suffering, as well. The Covid-19 Pandemic has touched the lives of the entire human family and has affected every sphere of life, including the ways in which we appreciate art during times of crisis. 

Normally, the Art Eyewitness "year in review" addresses positive trends and hopeful developments in the visual arts. Also shared are parting thoughts on the great exhibitions and new books which we have been fortunate to review. There will certainly be a few such comments in this essay. Since the Covid-19 museum closings began in March 2020, however, the opportunities to behold great works of art in person have been extremely limited. That has been - and continues to be - the big art story of 2020.

To introduce my reflections on the art scene during 2020, I am going to take a page from the National Gallery in London and present a "picture of the year." This work of art will, I hope, testify to the experience of art during the past year.

My choice wasn't difficult to make. Thomas Eakin's The Agnew Clinic, painted in 1889, is a work devoted to health care, in keeping with our thoughts on Covid-19. Created on an epic scale, the painting honors the noted surgeon at Philadelphia's Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Dr. D. Hayes Agnew.



Thomas Eakins, The Agnew Clinic, 1889

Eakins depicted Dr. Agnew lecturing to medical students as he and his team performed a mastectomy on a young woman patient. In a master stroke, Eakins complemented the heroic figure of Dr. Agnew and the vulnerable body of the patient by placing the operating room nurse, Mary V. Clymer, in a prominent position, anchoring the right-hand side of the painting.



Mary V. Clymer (1861-1942)
Photo from the Barbara Bates Center for the Study of Nursing, 
University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing

Mary Clymer was a dedicated and self-sacrificing member of the American medical profession. Born in 1861 to a working-class family, she enrolled in the recently-established nursing school at the University of Pennsylvania. She graduated in 1889, the year that Eakins painted The Agnew Clinic, receiving the Nightingale Medal for her outstanding achievements.

Miss Clymer's student notes have been preserved and one of the entries underscores the look of caring and empathy which Eakins captured with such remarkable feeling and insight.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2020)
 Detail of Thomas Eakin's The Agnew Clinic, showing Mary Clymer

“We must always be dignified & grave," Clymer noted on the mode of conduct expected of a nurse during a surgery, "never forgetting that all we are trying to do is for the good of the patient.” 

Dignity and concern for the good of the patient - these attributes are etched on Mary Clymer's face. The value of great art works like The Agnew Clinic is to remind us of the dedication of people in the caring professions, past and present. 

By extension, we need to acknowledge the inspiring efforts of museum workers, curators, digital support staff and public relations specialists. These gifted professionals launched an amazing array of "virtual" programs and educational initiatives to provide access to their collections and special exhibitions when the museum doors were closed by the Covid-19 quarantine. 

All the great art museums responded to the Covid crisis by opening the digital portals to their institutions. But this remarkable 360 degree "tour" of the Temple of Dendur at the Metropolitan Museum of Art will serve as an exemplar for the outstanding work by America's art museums, coast-to-coast, during 2020.



The Met 360° Project. The Temple of Dendur 
© The Metropolitan Museum of Art

The staff of the Metropolitan Museum of Art also needs a special measure of praise, or perhaps commiseration is more appropriate, on the way that they somehow managed to stage Met 150, the celebration of the 150th anniversary of the Met's founding despite Covid-19.  Although the festivities were reduced in scale and many exhibitions were postponed or cancelled, the Met was able to finally show it's principal exhibition, Making the Met, when the museum reopened in the late summer. 


Invitation to the Press Preview of Making the Met, 1870-2020

Sadly, I am going to miss Making the Met, because of the continued difficulty of travelling to New York. However, I was able to make it to the Smithsonian American Art Museum for the spectacular Alexander von Humboldt and the United States exhibition. Originally scheduled to begin on March 14, 2020, the Humboldt exhibit opened for a short run, September 18 - November 22, 2020.

As I wrote in a recent post, the Humboldt exhibit was splendid. The life of Alexander von Humboldt, the great German scientist of the early 1800's, was highlighted by art and artifacts from his epic journeys in Latin America and by art works inspired by his legacy. 



Ed Voves, Photo (2020)
 Gallery view of Humboldt and the United States, showing the Skeleton of the Mastodon, excavated by Charles Willson Peale

The center piece of the Humboldt exhibition was the magnificent skeleton of a prehistoric mastodon, "exhumed" in 1801 in Newburgh, New York. Later purchased for a German collection, the mighty mastodon made its first return to its native shores during the Humboldt exhibition.

To see the mastodon and the other treasures of the Humboldt exhibit was something of a "peak" experience for me. But more than a tinge of sadness colored my visit to the Smithsonian American Art Museum (SAAM) for this "once-in-a-lifetime" exhibition. The SAAM staff had prepared a wonderful range of interactive videos and activities aimed at school age children. When I visited, however, there were no kids, no school groups. I suspect that few young people managed to see this exhibit before its run was cut-short, six weeks early in late November.

One of the pictures on view in Humboldt and the United States was George Catlin's painting of Native American hunters, clad in wolf skins, sneaking up on a herd of grazing buffalo. This is among the earliest pictures which I can remember, from the Indians and the Old West volume of The Golden Library of Knowledge, which I received as a Christmas gift. It was very moving to see the original.



Ed Voves, Photo (2020) 
George Catlin's Buffalo Hunt under the Wolf-skin Mask, 1831-1833

Childhood reading, museum visits, school trips, etc., leave their mark on young lives, generally in a very positive manner. The Covid-19 lockdown is depriving children all over the world of such formative experiences. Whatever the physical dangers which Covid-19 poses to children, the emotional and intellectual damage is only beginning to be felt. The full extent will not be known for many years and it is almost certain to be devastating.

The outreach efforts of museums will help deal with some of the baneful social consequences of Covid-19. But the shift from museums as public institutions to "virtual" platforms raises some justified fears. An example from the past when privatization prevailed over a more expansive model of society is instructive. 


During 2020, I had occasion to consult an old favorite from my book shelves, Mark Girouard's Life in the English Country House. I started to re-read this classic book from 1978 and as I did so, the theme seemed to shift from a splendid commentary on architecture to an investigation of social trends. Somehow, I hadn't noticed that before.

With perceptive insight, Girouard traced the change in function of the great English rural estates. During the Middle Ages and Elizabethan times, the country estates were crowded with a host of retainers, servants, guests and travelers seeking shelter. The layout of rooms reflected the social function of these palatial "houses."



Unknown artist, Portrait of Sir Henry Unton, ca. 1596

A key illustration in the book, the Portrait of Sir Henry Unton, painted in 1596, documents the traditional country house lifestyle. Unton, a prominent Elizabethan diplomat, is depicted hosting a theatrical masque at his estate, Wadley House, in one of the episodes of this unusual work of art. Providing lavish entertainments such as this was an expected feature of country house etiquette. 

The English country houses were centers of culture, as well as ostentatious living. Acting companies, including Shakespeare's, toured the country houses. Libraries and "cabinets of curiosities" became permanent features of these impressive dwellings.

As the centuries passed, the country houses with their great halls open to multitudes changed due to an ever-growing demand for privacy. The tradition of "old English hospitality" for the many faded away. By the mid-1700's, it was gone, though the rise of public institutions like the British Museum, founded in 1759, took on the role of providing for learning and enjoyment open to all.



Admission ticket to the British Museum, 1790 
©Trustees of the British Museum

Museums in the United States served in like fashion and continue to do so. As society changes, museums have successfully served as forums for a democratic, pluralistic society. As in the medieval-era country houses, people of diverse backgrounds come together in the shared space of the museum to embrace life.

In last year's Art Scene reflections, I was very upbeat on the role of museums in society. A few short months later, the situation changed dramatically - and for the worse. Covid-19 has dealt a  devastating blow to art museums as the bastions for an open society. 

It is very difficult to find positive trends or developments- at least in the short term - upon which to base hope for museums, when the doors of these public institutions are locked. 

A survey of 750 museum directors, conducted by the American Alliance of Museums in June 2020, makes for some very sobering reading. The key points are excerpted below:

1. One-third (33%) of museum directors surveyed confirmed there was a  “significant risk” of closing permanently by next fall, or they “didn’t know” if they would survive.

2. The vast majority (87%) of museums have only 12 months or less of financial operating reserves remaining, with 56% having less than six months left to cover operations.

3. During the pandemic, 75% of museums stepped into their pivotal role as educators providing virtual educational programs, experiences, and curricula to students, parents, and teachers.

4, Two-thirds (64%) of directors predicted cuts in education, programming, or other public services due to significant budget cuts.

In the place of thriving forums of learning and public discourse, we currently have empty galleries. Like the paintings of the National Gallery, stacked in the mine shafts at Manod, the works of art are safe - but beyond our reach when we so desperately need inspiration.



Anne Lloyd, Photo (2020) Gallery view of the Philadelphia Museum of Art, late 19th century American painting and decorative art

What is to be done under the present, discouraging, circumstances?

At this point, it is important to reject desperation or fatalism. The worst-case scenarios of the museum survey have not happened - yet. 

Instead of despair, I think we should cultivate what John Keats called “Negative Capability, that is, when a man is capable of being in uncertainties, mysteries, doubts, without any irritable reaching after fact and reason.” 

If we cultivate "Negative Capability," we can still embrace the creative life, the joy of art and the search for meaning. Our minds and hearts can still function despite the "uncertainties, mysteries, doubts" which afflict us.

If your church is closed because of Covid-19, practice mindfulness meditation. If libraries are closed, read the old favorites on your bedside bookshelf - I was amazed at the new insights I derived from reading Life in the English Country House after so many years.

If the art museums remain closed - some perhaps forever - then it's time we started creating our own art. Search inward and then reach for a sketchbook or lump of sculpting clay. I've begun taking photos of nearby trees and gardens as a form of creative expression. I'm still far from matching the brilliance of my wife, Anne's, photography, which has lifted Art Eyewitness to new levels of visual enchantment. But I've lit a few "single candles" and the glow from them really is better than darkness.




Ed Voves, (Photo 2020) Seasonal Images of Philadelphia, PA

In closing, we at Art Eyewitness wish you a Happy New Year! Yes, the art scene is rather bleak right now but the "candles" we will light in 2021 will brighten the world around us like the dawn!

***
Text: Copyright of Ed Voves. Original Photos: Anne Lloyd and Ed Voves. All rights reserved 

The excerpt of the June 2020 museum survey by the the American Alliance of Museums is quoted from:
https://www.aam-us.org/2020/07/22/united-states-may-lose-one-third-of-all-museums-new-survey-shows
                                                                  
Images of The Agnew Clinic by Thomas Eakins, courtesy of the University of Pennsylvania and the Philadelphia Museum of Art. Additional images, courtesy of the National Gallery, London, the National Portrait Gallery, London, the British Museum, the Metropolitan Museum of Art and Yale University Press.

Introductory Image:
Detail of Thomas Eakin's The Agnew Clinic, showing Mary Clymer. Image details below.

Unknown Photographer. First Picture of the Month, Titian Noli Me Tangere (NG270), in the West Vestibule of the National Gallery, London, March 12-21 April 21,1942. Archive reference number - NG30/1942/43

Titian (Italian, 1488/90-1576) Noli Me Tangere, ca. 1514 Oil on canvas: 110.5 x 91.9 cm. National Gallery, London. Bequeathed by Samuel Rogers, 1856. NG270

Thomas Eakins (American, 1844–1916) Portrait of Dr. Hayes Agnew (The Agnew Clinic), 1889. Oil on canvas: On loan from the University of Pennsylvania Art Collection to the Philadelphia Museum of Art.

Mary V. Clymer (1861-1942) Photo from the Barbara Bates Center for the Study of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing.
https://www.nursing.upenn.edu/history/archives-collections/mary-clymer-collection/

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2020) Detail of Thomas Eakin's The Agnew Clinic, 1889, showing Mary Clymer.

The Met 360° Project. The Temple of Dendur at the Metropolitan Museum of Art. ©The Metropolitan Museum of Art

Metropolitan Museum of Art Press Preview invitation for the Making the Met, 1870-2020 exhibition. Copyright © The Metropolitan Museum of Art.

Ed Voves, Photo (2020) Gallery view of the Humboldt and the United States exhibition at the Smithsonian American Art Museum, showing the Skeleton of the Mastodon, excavated by Charles Willson Peale in 1801.

Ed Voves, Photo (2020) George Catlin's Buffalo Hunt under the Wolf-skin Mask, 1831-1833. Oil on canvas: 24 x 29 in. (60.9 x 73.7 cm). Smithsonian American Art Museum. Gift of Mrs. Joseph Harrison, Jr.

Cover art for Mark Girouard's Life in the English Country House (Yale University Press, 1978) © Yale University Press

Unknown artist, Portrait of Sir Henry Unton, ca. 1596. Oil on panel: 29 1/8 in. x 64 1/4 in. (740 mm x 1632 mm) National Portrait Gallery, London, purchased in 1884. #NPG 710.

Admission ticket to the British Museum, 1790 ©Trustees of the British Museum

Anne Lloyd, Photo (2020) Gallery view of the Philadelphia Museum of Art, Gallery 211, late 19th century American art

Ed Voves, (Photo 2020) Seasonal Images of Philadelphia, PA